Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Twenty-four male children—12 developmentally dyspraxic and 12 normal control children—ranging in age from 6 through 8 years were tested using an object recognition test developed to assess active and passive touch in children. The test was an adapted version of one developed by Gibson (1962) to assess active and passive touch in normal adults. It was hypothesized that dyspraxic boys would perform more poorly than normal boys on tasks of active touch and on tasks of passive touch. It was hypothesized also that the differences between dyspraxic and normal boys would be greater on active than on passive touch tasks, because active touch is a more complex process, which involves relating active, sequential movements. Analysis of the data indicates that the developmentally dyspraxic boys performed significantly more poorly than normal males on both active and passive touch tasks. These results are consistent with other studies that report that children with perceptual-motor and learning problems display deficits in tactile functioning. The study did not support the second hypothesis, that there would be a significant group-by-task interaction such that the differences between the dyspraxic and normal boys would be greater on active than on passive touch tasks.

Keywords

learning disabilities somatosensory system haptic form perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres

A. J.

(1964). Tactile functions: Their relation to hyperactive and perceptual motor behavior. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18, 6–11.

Ayres

A. J.

(1972a). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A. J.

(1972b). Southern California Sensory Integration Tests Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Bell

R. Q.

Weller

G. M.

Waldrop

M. F.

(1971). Newborns and preschoolers: Organization of behavior and relations between periods. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 36, (1–2, whole no. 142).

Berges

Lezine

(1965). The imitation of gestures. In Clinics in Development Medicine. London: William Heinemann Medical Books.

Brasic-Royeen

(1982, May). The process of active touch. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Philadelphia.

Cronin

(1977). Active and passive touch at four age levels. Developmental Psychology, 13, 253–256.

Dawdy

S. C.

(1981). Pediatric neuropsychology: Caring for the developmentally dyspraxic child. Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 30–37.

Derevensky

J. L.

(1979). Relative contributions of active and passive touch to a child's knowledge of physical objects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 1331–1346.

10.

Gaddes

W. H.

(1980). Learning disabilities and brain function: A neuropsychological approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.

11.

Gazzaniga

M. S.

LeDoux

J. E.

(1978). The integrated mind. New York: Plenum Press.

12.

Gibson

J. J.

(1962). Observations of active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477–491.

13.

Gibson

J. J.

(1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

14.

Gubbay

S. S.

(1975). The clumsy child: A study of developmental apraxic and agnosic ataxia. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

15.

Gubbay

S. S.

(1979). The clumsy child. In Rose

(Ed.), Paediatric neurology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

16.

Gubbay

S. S.

Ellis

Walton

J. N.

Court

S. D. M.

(1965). Clumsy children: A study of apraxic and agnosic defects in 21 children. Brain, 88, 295–312.

17.

Heller

M. A.

(1980). Reproduction of tactually perceived forms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 943–946.

18.

Henderson

Llorens

Gilfoyle

Myers

Prevel

(1974). The development of sensory integrative theory and practice: A collection of the works of A Jean Ayres. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

19.

Hughes

B.J.

(1976). Pressure levels in active touch in normal and learning disabled children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 4281A. (University Microfilms No. 76-30, 401).

20.

Illingworth

R. S.

(1980). Developmental variations in relation to minimal brain dysfunction. In Rie

H. E.

Rie

E. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of minimal brain dysfunctions. New York: Wiley.

21.

LeDoux

J. E.

(1979). Parieto-occipital symptomology, the split-brain perspective. In Gazzaniga

M. S.

(Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press.

22.

Nixon

W. R.

(1977). The effects of proprioceptive arousal on the cutaneous sensitivity of constructional dyspraxic and normal children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 3622B. (University Microfilms No. 77-184).

23.

Piaget

Inhelder

(1967). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

24.

Seiderman

A. S.

(1970). Motor planning and developmental apraxia. Journal of American Optometric Association, 41, 846–857.

25.

Vierck

C. J.

(1974). Tactile movement detection and discrimination following dorsal column lesions in monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 20, 331–346.

26.

Witelson

S. F.

(1974). Hemispheric specialization for linguistic and non-linguistic tactual perception using a dichotomous stimulation technique. Cortex, 10, 3–17.

27.

Zaporozhets

A. V.

(1969). Some of the psychological problems of sensory training in early childhood and preschool period. In Cole

Maltzman

(Eds.), A handbook of contemporary soviet psychology. New York: Basic Books.

Active and Passive Touch in Developmentally Dyspraxic and Normal Boys

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References