Identifying Home Safety Concerns Among Older Adults Aging With Pets

Abstract

Assessing risks in pet owners’ home environment may help develop strategies to enhance safety and well-being. The objective of this study is to uncover key themes informing the development of a home safety assessment tool for older adults with pets. A literature review and focus group interviews informed understanding of the safety concerns of older adults caring for pets. Participants were primary caregivers of a dog and/or cat (N = 30). Qualitative coding and analysis were guided by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. None of the six included articles identified a tool for detecting pet care safety concerns. Focus group findings indicate pet behavior, care needs, and caregiving activities impact home safety, potentially affecting safely aging in place. This study highlights the need to address home safety with pets and identifies factors for increasing safety. Findings will inform tool development; further research is needed to refine and validate.

Plain Language Summary

Safety Considerations for Older Adults Living With Pets at Home

Many older adults live with pets, which can offer companionship and emotional support but also introduce unique safety concerns in the home. Understanding these safety risks is essential, as pets’ behaviors, care requirements, and caregiving activities may pose challenges to aging safely in the home environment. This study aimed to better understand these risks and gather information to develop a home safety assessment tool for older adults with pets. Researchers reviewed existing studies and conducted focus group discussions with 30 older adults who were the primary caregivers of a dog or a cat. The review found that no current tools exist to specifically assess the safety concerns related to pet ownership for older adults. The focus group discussions revealed that several factors impact home safety, including pets’ behaviors (e.g., sudden movements), their care needs (e.g., feeding and grooming), and the physical demands of caregiving tasks (e.g., bending to feed or walking pets). These challenges can make it harder for older adults to live safely and independently at home. This study highlights the need for a tool to help identify and address pet-related home safety concerns. By understanding these risks, older adults, caregivers, and health care professionals can take steps to improve safety. Future research will focus on developing and testing a practical tool to support aging in place with pets.

Keywords

accessibility aging older adults instrumental activities of daily living

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambrose

A. F.

Paul

Hausdorff

J. M.

(2013). Risk factors for falls among older adults: A review of the literature. Maturitas, 75(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Suppl. 2), Article 7412410010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001

Applebaum

J. W.

Ellison

Struckmeyer

Zsembik

B. A.

McDonald

S. E.

(2021). The impact of pets on everyday life for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.652610

Applebaum

J. W.

Peek

C. W.

Zsembik

B. A.

(2023). Examining U.S. pet ownership using the general social survey. The Social Science Journal, 60, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1728507

Aveyard

(2014). Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill.

Boateng

G. O.

Neilands

T. B.

Frongillo

E. A.

Melgar-Quiñonez

H. R.

Young

S. L.

(2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2018.00149/BIBTEX

Canady

Sansone

(2019). Health care decisions and delay of treatment in companion animal owners. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 26(3), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10880-018-9593-4

Cassidy

McConnell

Boyce

(2021). The older adult: Associated fire risks and current challenges for the development of future fire safety intervention strategies. Fire and Materials, 45(4), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2823

Charness

Boot

W. R.

(2022). A grand challenge for psychology: Reducing the age-related digital divide. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421106814

10.

Chase

Layher

(2012, September). The perils and pleasures of pet ownership: Exploring the role of the home health occupational therapist. Home & Community Health Special Interest Section Quarterly, 19(3), 1–3.

11.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

12.

Enders-Slegers

M. J.

Hediger

(2019). Pet ownership and human–animal interaction in an aging population: Rewards and challenges. Anthrozoös, 32(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1569907

13.

Friedmann

Gee

N. R.

Simonsick

E. M.

Studenski

Resnick

Barr

Kitner-Triolo

Hackney

(2020). Pet ownership patterns and successful aging outcomes in community dwelling older adults. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, Article 293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00293

14.

Gee

N. R.

Mueller

K. K.

(2019). A systematic review of research on pet ownership and animal interactions among older adults. Anthrozoös, 32(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1569903

15.

Godfrey

C. M.

Harrison

M. B.

Lang

Macdonald

Leung

Swab

(2013). Homecare safety and medication management with older adults: A scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 11(7), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2013-959

16.

Haby

M. M.

Chapman

Clark

Barreto

Reveiz

Lavis

J. N.

(2016). What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: A rapid review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-016-0155-7/TABLES/1

17.

Hennink

M. M.

Kaiser

B. N.

Weber

M. B.

(2019). What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 29(10), 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692

18.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

19.

Keall

M. D.

Pierse

Howden-Chapman

Cunningham

Guria

Baker

M. G.

(2015). Home modifications to reduce injuries from falls in the Home Injury Prevention Intervention (HIPI) study: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 385(9964), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61006-0

20.

Keglovits

Clemson

Y. L.

Nguyen

Neff

A. J.

Mandelbaum

Hudson

Williams

Silianoff

Stark

(2020). A scoping review of fall hazards in the homes of older adults and development of a framework for assessment and intervention. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 67(5), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12682

21.

Obradović

Lagueux

É.

Latulippe

Provencher

(2021). Understanding the benefits, challenges, and the role of pet ownership in the daily lives of community-dwelling older adults: A case study. Animals, 11(9), 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092628

22.

Obradović

Lagueux

É.

Michaud

Provencher

(2020). Pros and cons of pet ownership in sustaining independence in community-dwelling older adults: A scoping review. Ageing & Society, 40(9), 2061–2076. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000382

23.

O’Connor

Joffe

(2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406919899220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

24.

Orellano

Colón

W. I.

Arbesman

(2012). Effect of occupation- and activity-based interventions on instrumental activities of daily living performance among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.5014/AJOT.2012.003053

25.

Pashmdarfard

Azad

(2020). Assessment tools to evaluate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in older adults: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 34(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.34171/MJIRI.34.33

26.

Peters

M. D. J.

Godfrey

C. M.

McInerney

Soares

C. B.

Khalil

Parker

(2015). The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Joanne Briggs Institute.

27.

Raina

Waltner-Toews

Bonnett

Woodward

Abernathy

(1999). Influence of companion animals on the physical and psychological health of older people: An analysis of a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1532-5415.1999.TB02996.X

28.

Song

Parekh

Hooper

Loke

Y. K.

Ryder

Sutton

A. J.

Hing

Kwok

C. S.

Pang

Harvey

(2010). Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases. Health Technology Assessment, 14(8), 1–193. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14080

29.

Stevens

Garritty

Hersi

Moher

(2018). Developing PRISMA-RR, a reporting guideline for rapid reviews of primary studies (Protocol). https://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PRISMA-RR-protocol.pdf

30.

Stevens

J. A.

Teh

S. L.

Haileyesus

(2010). Dogs and cats as environmental fall hazards. Journal of Safety Research, 41(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSR.2010.01.001

31.

Struckmeyer

L. R.

Campbell

Ellison

Ahrentzen

Classen

(2022). Home modifications and repurposing: Perspectives on the accessibility, affordability, and attractiveness. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44, 4619–4628. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1910866

32.

Struckmeyer

L. R.

Morgan-Daniel

Ahrentzen

Ellison

(2021). Home modification assessments for accessibility and aesthetics: A rapid review. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 14(2), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720960704

33.

Struckmeyer

L. R.

Pickens

(2016). Home modifications for people with Alzheimer’s disease: A scoping review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 70(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5014/AJOT.2015.016089

34.

Tricco

A. C.

Antony

Zarin

Strifler

Ghassemi

Ivory

Perrier

Hutton

Moher

Straus

S. E.

(2015). A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Medicine, 13(1), Article 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6

35.

World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF the international classification of functioning, disability and health. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/classification/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf

36.

Zhao

Alderden

Lind

Stibrany

(2019). Risk factors for falls in homebound community-dwelling older adults. Public Health Nursing, 36(6), 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12651

37.

Zimolag

U. U.

(2011). An evolutionary concept analysis of caring for a pet as an everyday occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.586325

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB