Abstract
Background
Errorless learning is an intervention technique used in acquired brain injury (ABI) rehabilitation. To support the use of this intervention within occupational therapy practice, it is important to know how errorless learning has been applied to (re)train daily functions.
Objectives
To describe the empirical literature on errorless learning applied to everyday functioning in adults with ABI.
Method
A scoping review was conducted with systematic searching of four databases (i.e., AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) and screening by independent reviewers.
Findings
41 experiments from 34 papers met eligibility criteria. Errorless learning has been heterogeneously delineated, described, and applied. Operationalization of everyday functioning has been poorly reported, and mostly applied to technology use and instrumental activities of daily living.
Implications
Greater clarity and detail of errorless learning interventions are required, and more research is needed on its applications to everyday functioning.
Plain Language Summary
Errorless learning is a technique used by some occupational therapists to (re)teach skills to people with learning challenges from brain injury. Although errorless learning has existed since the 1960s, we do not know whether researchers have a similar understanding of the concept and method, or include relevance to how people function in the real world. A review of studies is needed so that progress can be made on improving success in rehabilitation. The purpose of this review is to “scope” the existing studies on errorless learning when it has been used for everyday functioning in people with brain injury. We wanted to learn how researchers have thought about errorless learning and used the technique in studies. We began this review by systematically searching four research article databases, then screening retrieved articles by independent reviewers to find studies meeting our inclusion criteria. We pulled the key information from included studies, then used descriptive statistics to summarize the findings and inductive content analysis to highlight features of errorless learning. Our search included 41 experiments from 34 papers. Papers varied in whether errorless learning was truly “errorless” and how errorless learning was carried out, often being combined with other rehabilitation techniques. There were many differences in how errorless learning was delivered, like amount of practice. Some important intervention elements were not described in the studies, so it is difficult to understand how the technique is carried out. Also, some types of everyday functioning activities were missing and the ones that were studied were mostly chosen by researchers. Future researchers should provide more details about errorless learning intervention designs and be consistent in their reporting. Everyday functioning activities should be chosen by people with brain injury so that these are personally meaningful and better improve their lives outside clinical settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
