Many institutions recommend modified bathing techniques for individuals with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) due to infection risk. Although these techniques may be challenging for patients, there currently is no assessment to evaluate these skills and whether intervention programs have been successful. This article describes the development and content validation of the LVAD Bathing Assessment. The content validity index (CVI) process was used to determine the relevance of assessment items. Modified Kappa indices were calculated to account for the possibility of chance agreement among raters. Eight content validity experts rated each assessment item and provided feedback. The overall assessment and 44 of 47 individual items had excellent content validity (scale-level CVI [S-CVI] = 0.97; item-level CVI [I-CVI] > 0.78). Minor revisions were made based on feedback. Creation of an LVAD bathing assessment may improve care by identifying safety risks that may cause infection. Further studies for construct validation and reliability testing are needed.
Abbott. (2020). Heartmate 3 left ventricular assist system instructions for use.
2.
AbshireM. A.BidwellJ. T.PavlovicN.DeGrootL.MammosD.LarsenL.BautistaS.DavidsonP. M. (2021). A picture is worth a thousand words: Exploring the roles of caregivers and the home environment of ventricular assist device patients. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(8), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab043
3.
AburjaniaN.SheraziS.TchantchaleishviliV.AlexisJ. D.HayC. M. (2017). Stopping conventional showering decreases Pseudomonas infections in left ventricular assist device patients. The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 40(6), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000590
4.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process—Fourth edition. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Supplement_2), 7412410010p1–7412410010p87. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
5.
CannonA.ElliottT.BallewC.CaveyJ.O’SheaG.FranzwaJ.PuhlmanM.BennettJ.RyanT.LockardK.AvrahamiN.BrennanP.KurienS.AndrusS.DickS.DavisE. (2012). Variability in infection control measures for the percutaneous lead among programs implanting long-term ventricular assist devices in the United States. Progress in Transplantation, 22(4), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2012612
6.
CasidaJ. M.MarcuccilliL.PetersR. M.WrightS. (2011). Lifestyle adjustments of adults with long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: A phenomenologic inquiry. Heart & Lung, 40(6), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.05.002
7.
CasidaJ. M.PavolM.CraddockH.SchroederS. E.CagliostroB.BudhathokiC. (2021). Patient-reported issues following left ventricular assist device implantation hospitalization. ASAIO Journal American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, 67(6), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001381
8.
CasidaJ. M.WuH.-S.HardenJ.ChernJ.CarieA. (2015). Development and initial evaluation of the psychometric properties of self-efficacy and adherence scales for patients with a left ventricular assist device. Progress in Transplantation, 25(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2015597
9.
GreimanL.FlemingS. P.WardB.MyersA.RaveslootC. (2018). Life starts at home: Bathing, exertion and participation for people with mobility impairment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 99(7), 1289–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.015
10.
KatoN. P.JaarsmaT.CasidaJ. M.LeeC. S.StrömbergA.GalT. B. (2019). Development of an instrument for measuring self-care behaviors after left ventricular assist device implantation. Progress in Transplantation, 29(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526924819874358
11.
KatoN. P.JaarsmaT.GalT. B. (2014). Learning self-care after left ventricular assist device implantation. Current Heart Failure Reports, 11(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-014-0201-0
12.
LanfearA. T.HamandiM.FanJ.DiMaioJ. M.GeorgeT. J. (2020). Trends in HeartMate 3: What we know so far. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 35(1), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14319
13.
LumishH. S.CagliostroB.BraghieriL.BohnB.MondelliniG. M.AntlerK.FeldmanV.KleetA.MurphyJ.TiburcioM.FidlowK.JenningsD.SayerG. T.TakedaK.NakaY.DemmerR. T.AaronJ. G.UrielN.ColomboP. C.YuzefpolskayaM. (2022). Driveline infection in left ventricular assist device patients: Effect of standardized protocols, pathogen type, and treatment strategy. ASAIO Journal American Society for Artificial Internal Organs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001690
MurphyM. C.SomervilleE.KeglovitsM.HuY. L.StarkS. (2017). In-home medication management performance evaluation (HOME-Rx): A validity study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(4), 7104190020p1–7104190020p7. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.022756
16.
NayeF.DécaryS.Tousignant-LaflammeY. (2022). Development and content validity of a rating scale for the pain and disability drivers management model. Archives of Physiotherapy, 12(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00137-2
17.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
18.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T.OwenS. V. (2007). Focus on research methods: Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
19.
RodriguesI. B.AdachiJ. D.BeattieK. A.MacDermidJ. C. (2017). Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), Article 540. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5
20.
ShepherdJ.WildingC. (2005). Occupational therapy for people with ventricular assist devices. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53(1), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00506.x
21.
TattevinP.FlécherE.AuffretV.LeclercqC.BouléS.VincentelliA.DambrinC.DelmasC.BarandonL.VeniardV.KindoM.CardiT.GaudardP.RouvièreP.SénageT.JacobN.DefayeP.ChavanonO.VerdonkC.GalandV. (2019). Risk factors and prognostic impact of left ventricular assist device–associated infections. American Heart Journal, 214, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.021
22.
WidmarS. B.DietrichM. S.MinnickA. F. (2014). How self-care education in ventricular assist device programs is organized and provided: A national study. Heart & Lung, 43(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.09.003
23.
ZamanzadehV.GhahramanianA.RassouliM.AbbaszadehA.Alavi-MajdH.NikanfarA.-R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
