Interoception is awareness of one’s own internal bodily states. Currently, no participation-based measure of interoception exists. The purpose of this study was to identify items with adequate psychometric properties for a participation-based interoceptive measure grounded in Dunn’s Sensory Processing Framework named the Sensory Profile: Interoception (SPI). Using a cross-sectional psychometric design, internal consistency was examined by calculating Cronbach’s alpha for each of the four subscales of the SPI. Concurrent validity was studied using Pearson Product Moment Correlations to identify relationships between the SPI and the Adolescent Adult Sensory Profile (A/ASP) subscales. Interoception items correlating most strongly with their intended subscale were identified, maintaining 70 of the original 101 items (N = 55). The resulting subscales (sensitivity, avoiding, registration, and seeking) had good internal consistency (α = .63–.88) and correlated moderately with the corresponding A/ASP subscale. The findings provide preliminary support for the SPI’s internal consistency and concurrent validity.
BrewerR.CookR.BirdG. (2015). Alexithymia: A general deficit of interoception. Royal Society Open Science, 3(10), 150664. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150664
2.
BrownC.CromwellR.FilionD.DunnW.TollefsonN. (2002). Sensory processing in schizophrenia: Missing and avoiding information. Schizophrenia Research, 55(1–2), 187–195.
BrownC.TollefsonN.DunnW.CromwellR.FilionD. (2001). The adult sensory profile: Measuring patterns of sensory processing. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(1), 75–82.
5.
CabreraA.KolaczJ.PailhezG.Bulbena-CabreA.BulbenaA.PorgesS. W. (2018). Assessing body awareness and autonomic reactivity: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(2), e1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1596
ChurchillG. A.PeterP. (1984). Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 360–375.
DunnW. (2007). Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants and Young Children, 20, 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000264477.05076.5d
10.
DunnW.BrownC.BreitmeyerA.SalweiA. (2022). Construct validity of the Sensory Profile Interoception scale: Measuring participation in everyday life. Frontiers in Psychology Special Issue on Sensory Processing and Participation, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872619
11.
ElliottJ. E.PfeifferG. (2022). Relationship between interoceptive sensitivity, age, and COVID-19 anxiety during the first national lockdown in the United Kingdom. Aging and Mental Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2026878
12.
FieneL.IrelandM. J.BrownlowC. (2018). The Interoception Sensory Questionnaire (ISQ): A scale to measure interoceptive challenges in adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(10), 3354–3366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3600-3
13.
ForrestL. N.SmithA. R.WhiteR. D.JoinerT. E. (2015). (Dis)connected: An examination of interoception in individuals with suicidality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(3), 754–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000074
14.
GarfinkelS. N.SethA. K.BarrettA. B.SuzukiK.CritchleyH. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004
15.
JelinčićV.von LeupoldtA. (2021). To breathe or not to breathe: Interoceptive predictions in an anxious brain. Neuron, 109(24), 3904–3907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.11.024
16.
KhouryN. M.LutzJ.Schuman-OlivierZ. (2018). Interoception in psychiatric disorders: A review of randomized, controlled trials with interoception-based interventions. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 26(5), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000170
17.
LabusJ. S.BolusR.ChangL.WiklundI.NaesdalJ.MayerE. A.NaliboffB. D. (2004). The Visceral Sensitivity Index: Development and validation of a gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety scale. Aliment Pharmacology Therapy, 20(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02007.x
18.
LongarzoM.D’OlimpioF.ChiavazzoA.SantangeloG.TrojanoL.GrossiD. (2015). The relationships between interoception and alexithymic trait. The Self-Awareness Questionnaire in healthy subjects. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01149
19.
MehlingW. E. (2016). Differentiating attention styles and regulatory aspects of self-reported interoceptive sensibility. Philosophical Transactions, 371, 20160013. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0013
20.
MehlingW. E.PriceC.DaubenmierJ. J.AcreeM.BartmessE.StewartA. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLOS ONE, 7(11), Article e48230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048230
SchulzA.BackS. N.SchaanV. K.BertschK.VögeleC. (2021). On the construct validity of interoceptive accuracy based on heartbeat counting: Cardiovascular determinants of absolute and tilt-induced change scores. Biological Psychology, 164, 108168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108168
23.
ShieldsS. A.MalloryM. E.SimonA. (1989). The Body Awareness Questionnaire: Reliability and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 802–815. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5304_16
