Mindfulness is promising for individuals with neurological disorders and their caregivers to improve psychological well-being. The potential application of a Langerian mindfulness intervention, focused on attention to variability, however, is still unknown. The objective of the study was to determine the feasibility (usability, satisfaction, and potential effectiveness on psychological well-being) of an online mindfulness intervention for stroke survivors and caregivers. Using mixed methods, 11 stroke survivors and three caregivers participated in a 3-week, online, Langerian mindfulness intervention. A semi-structured interview assessed the intervention’s usability and gathered feedback. Self-reported measures about psychological well-being were documented remotely 3 times (preintervention, postintervention, and 1-month follow-up). Qualitatively, participants were highly satisfied with the intervention and reported subjective benefits, but the usability of the online platform was poor. None of the self-reported measures changed over time. This study provided evidence of feasibility of an online Langerian mindfulness intervention in a new population: stroke survivors and caregivers.
AbbottR. A.WhearR.RodgersL. R.BethelA.Thompson CoonJ.KuykenW.SteinK.DickensC. (2014). Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness based cognitive therapy in vascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 76(5), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.02.012
2.
AlexanderC. N.LangerE. J.NewmanR. I.ChandlerH. M.DaviesJ. L. (1989). Transcendental Meditation, mindfulness, and longevity: An experimental study with the elderly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 950–964. http://dx.doi.org.libproxy1.usc.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.950
3.
AlhadretiO. (2020). A comparative usability study of blackboard and Desire2Learn: Students’ perspective. In ZaphirisP.IoannouA. (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. Designing, developing and deploying learning experiences (pp. 3–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_1.
4.
AyerbeL.AyisS.WolfeC. D. A.RuddA. G. (2013). Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.107664
Campbell BurtonC. A.MurrayJ.HolmesJ.AstinF.GreenwoodD.KnappP. (2013). Frequency of anxiety after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. International Journal of Stroke, 8(7), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00906.x
7.
ColorafiK. J.EvansB. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171
8.
CreswellJ. W.Plano-ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
9.
DuncanP. W.BodeR. K.LaiS. M.PereraS. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 950–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
Hartman-MaeirA.SorokerN.RingH.AvniN.KatzN. (2007). Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(7), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600924996
12.
JaniB. D.SimpsonR.LawrenceM.SimpsonS.MercerS. W. (2018). Acceptability of mindfulness from the perspective of stroke survivors and caregivers: A qualitative study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4(1), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0244-1
13.
KupstM. J.ButtZ.StoneyC. M.GriffithJ. W.SalsmanJ. M.FolkmanS.CellaD. (2015). Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(5), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.994204
LawrenceM.BoothJ.MercerS.CrawfordE. (2013). A systematic review of the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions following transient ischemic attack and stroke. International Journal of Stroke, 8(6), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12135
18.
LewisJ. R. (1992). Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire: The PSSUQ. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 36(16), 1259–1260. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129203601617
19.
MayoN. E.Wood-DauphineeS.CoteR.DurcanL.CarltonJ.CôtéR.DurcanL.CarltonJ. (2002). Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(8), 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.33984
20.
MorimotoT.SchreinerA. S.AsanoH. (2003). Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life among Japanese stroke caregivers. Age and Ageing, 32(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/32.2.218
PagniniF.PhillipsD.HaulmanA.BankertM.SimmonsZ.LangerE. (2022). An online non-meditative mindfulness intervention for people with ALS and their caregivers: A randomized controlled trial. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, 23, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2021.1928707
24.
PatelM. D.TillingK.LawrenceE.RuddA. G.WolfeC. D. A.McKevittC. (2006). Relationships between long-term stroke disability, handicap and health-related quality of life. Age and Ageing, 35(3), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afj074
RuckerR.FrassL. (2017). Faculty members’ perceptions of support and system usage experiences when their institution of higher education migrates from Blackboard Vista learning management systems to Desire2Learn. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(2), 259–277. https://doi.org.libproxy1.usc.edu/10.1177/0047239517711954
27.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
28.
SnyderE.CaiB.DeMuroC.MorrisonM. F.BallW. (2018). A new single-item sleep quality scale: Results of psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic primary insomnia and depression. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 14(11), 1849–1857. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7478
29.
Tickle-DegnenL. (2013). Nuts and bolts of conducting feasibility studies. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.006270
30.
UlrichsenK. M.KaufmannT.DørumE. S.KolskårK. K.RichardG.AlnæsD.ArnebergT. J.WestlyeL. T.NordvikJ. E. (2016). Clinical utility of mindfulness training in the treatment of fatigue after stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00912
31.
Visser-MeilyA.PostM.GorterJ. W.BerlekomS. B. V.Van Den BosT.LindemanE. (2006). Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centred approach. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(24), 1557–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600648215
32.
WangX.SmithC.AshleyL.HylandM. E. (2019). Tailoring self-help mindfulness and relaxation techniques for stroke survivors: Examining preferences, feasibility and acceptability. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00391
33.
World Health Organization. (2004). The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF.
34.
ZaritS. H.ReeverK. E.Bach-PetersonJ. (1980). Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/20.6.649
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
