Metacognitive strategy training shows promise for reducing disability following stroke, but previous trials have excluded people with aphasia. Considering the high incidence of poststroke aphasia, it is important to determine whether people with aphasia can benefit from strategy training. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of an adapted strategy training protocol for people with aphasia. We recruited 16 adults with mild-moderate aphasia from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. We examined recruitment and retention, intervention delivery and fidelity, participant engagement and communication, participant strategy mastery, and change in disability. Therapists demonstrated good fidelity to intervention elements. Participants demonstrated good engagement and fair communication. The sample achieved a mean Functional Independence Measure change of 21.8 (SD = 16.2, Cohen’s d = .95), similar to matched controls without aphasia from previous trials. An adapted strategy training protocol appears feasible for people with aphasia in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Future studies should examine the efficacy of this approach in larger samples.
AliM.BathP. M.LydenP. D.BernhardtJ.BradyM., & VISTA Collaboration. (2014). Representation of people with aphasia in randomized controlled trials of acute stroke interventions. International Journal of Stroke, 9(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12043
2.
BalabanB.TokF.YavuzF.YasarE.AlacaR. (2011). Early rehabilitation outcome in patients with middle cerebral artery stroke. Neuroscience Letters, 498(3), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.009
3.
BeninatoM.Gill-BodyK. M.SallesS.StarkP. C.Black-SchafferR. M.SteinJ. (2006). Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(1), 32–39.
4.
BrottT.AdamsH.OlingerC. P.MarlerJ. R.BarsanW. G.BillerJ.SpilkerJ.HolleranR.EberleR.HertzbergV.RorickM.MoomawC. J.WalkerM. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke, 20, 864–870.
5.
DuncanP. W.BodeR. K.Min LaiS.PereraS., & Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 950–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00035-2
6.
EllisC.SimpsonA. N.BonilhaH.MauldinP. D.SimpsonK. N. (2012). The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke, 43(5), 1429–1431. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.111.647339
7.
FlowersH. L.SkoretzS. A.SilverF. L.RochonE.FangJ.Flamand-RozeC.MartinoR. (2016). Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(12), 2188–2201.e2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006
8.
GoldsteinL. B.SamsaG. P. (1997). Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke, 28(2), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.2.307
9.
GoodglassH.KaplanE.BarressiB. (2001). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
10.
Hartman-MaeirA.EliadY.KizoniR.NahaloniI.KelbermanH.KatzN. (2007). Evaluation of a long-term community based rehabilitation program for adult stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation, 22(4), 295–301.
11.
Helm-EstabrooksN. (2001). Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT): Examiner’s manual. The Psychological Corporation.
12.
JensenL. R.LøvholtA. P.SørensenI. R.BlüdnikowA. M.IversenH. K.HougaardA.MathiesenL. L.ForchhammerH. B. (2015). Implementation of supported conversation for communication between nursing staff and in-hospital patients with aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.955708
13.
KaganA. (1995). Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.1995.11754051
14.
KaganA. (1998a). Reply: Philosophical, practical and evaluative issues associated with “supported conversation for adults with aphasia.”Aphasiology, 12(9), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249580
15.
KaganA. (1998b). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology, 12(9), 816–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249575
16.
KaganA.BlackS. E.DuchanF. J.Simmons-MackieN.SquareP. (2001). Training volunteers as conversation partners using “supported conversation for adults with aphasia” (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(3), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051)
17.
KaganA.WinckelJ.BlackS.DuchanJ. F.Simmons-MackieN.SquareP. (2004). A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1310/CL3V-A94A-DE5C-CVBE
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
20.
LakensD. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
21.
LenzeE. J.MuninM. C.QuearT.DewM. A.RogersJ. C.BegleyA. E.ReynoldsC. F.3rd. (2004). The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale: Reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(3), 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.001
22.
Mc MenaminR.TierneyE.Mac FarlaneA. (2015). Addressing the long-term impacts of aphasia: How far does the Conversation Partner Programme go?Aphasiology, 29(8), 889–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1004155
23.
McVickerS.ParrS.PoundC.DuchanJ. (2009). The Communication Partner Scheme: A project to develop long-term, low-cost access to conversation for people living with aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701688783
24.
MutaiH.FurukawaT.ArakiK.MisawaK.HaniharaT. (2012). Factors associated with functional recovery and home discharge in stroke patients admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 12(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00747.x
25.
OttenbacherK. J.HsuY.GrangerC. V.FiedlerR. C. (1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(12), 1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90184-7
26.
PedersenP. M.JorgensenH. S.NakayamaH.RaaschouH. O.OlsenT. S. (1995). Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery. Annals of Neurology, 38(4), 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380416
27.
RouchS.SkidmoreE. R. (2018). Examining guided and directed cues in strategy training and usual rehabilitation. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 38(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449218758618
SkidmoreE. R.ButtersM.WhyteE.GrattanE.ShenJ.TerhorstL. (2017). Guided training relative to direct skill training for individuals with cognitive impairments after stroke: A pilot randomized trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(4), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.004
30.
SkidmoreE. R.DawsonD. R.ButtersM. A.GrattanE. S.JuengstS. B.WhyteE. M.BegleyA.HolmM. B.BeckerJ. T. (2015). Strategy training shows promise for addressing disability in the first 6 months after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(7), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314562113
31.
SkidmoreE. R.DawsonD. R.WhyteE. M.ButtersM. A.DewM. A.GrattanE. S.BeckerJ. T.HolmM. B. (2014). Developing complex interventions: Lessons learned from a pilot study examining strategy training in acute stroke rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(4), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513502799
32.
StinemanM. G.SheaJ. A.JetteA.TassoniC. J.OttenbacherK. J.FiedlerR.GrangerC. V. (1996). The Functional Independence Measure: Tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(11), 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90130-6
WrayF.ClarkeD.ForsterA. (2018). Post-stroke self-management interventions: A systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(11), 1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1294206
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
