Children with disabilities often have fewer opportunities to engage in science, technology, engineering, and math programs that can enhance their educational and career opportunities. This study explored the quality, experience, and skills learned in a group-based robotics program for youth with disabilities. Survey responses of 23 youth (16 males, 7 females), aged 9 to 14 with a disability, were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Our results showed that youth with disabilities who participated in a robotics program rated the quality of their experience, perceived impact of the program, and skills gained highly across most items. Children enjoyed participating in the program and especially building the robots and making friends. Clinicians should consider engaging children with disabilities in robotics programs to enhance their participation and skill development.
AdamsK.CookA. (2014). Programming and controlling robots using scanning on a speech generating communication device: A case study. Technology & Disability, 25, 49-59.
2.
AlstonR. J.HamptonJ. L. (2000). Science and engineering as viable career choices for students with disabilities: A survey of parents and teachers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43, 158-164.
3.
BarakM.ZadokY. (2009). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal of Design and Education, 19, 289-307.
4.
BashamJ. D.IsraelM.MaynardK. (2010). An ecological model of STEM education: Operationalizing STEM for all. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 9-19.
5.
BecksteadD.GellatlyG. (2006). Innovation capabilities: Science and engineering employment in Canada and the United States.
6.
Beck-WinchatzB.RiccobonoM. A. (2008). Advancing participation of blind students in science, technology, engineering, and math. Advances in Space Research, 42, 1855-1858.
7.
BenittiR. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58, 978-988.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
9.
BurgstahlerS.ChangC. (2007). Gender differences in perceived value of a program to promote academic and career success for students with disabilities. Journal of Science Education for Students With Disabilities, 12(1), 1-20.
10.
CannonK.LaPointM.BirdN. (2007, June). Using robots to raise interest in technology among underrepresented groups. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14, 73-81.
11.
DunnC.RabrenK. S.TaylorS. L.DotsonC. K. (2012). Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 47-54.
12.
EguchiA. (2016). RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 692-699.
GreggN.WolfeG.JonesS.ToddR.MoonN.LangstonC. (2017). STEM e-mentoring and community college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(1), 47-63.
HarperC.SymonJ.FreaW. (2008). Recess is time-in: Using peers to improve social skills of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 815-826.
18.
HowardA.ParkC.RemyS. (2012). Using haptic and auditory interaction tools to engage students with visual impairments in robot programming activities. IEEE Transactions in Learning Technology, 5, 87-95.
19.
HuangI.ChenR. (2015). Employing people with disabilities in the Taiwanese workplace: Employers’ perceptions and considerations. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 59, 43-54.
20.
KolneK.LindsayS. (in review). A systematic review of programs and interventions for increasing the interest and participation of children and youth with disabilities in STEM education or careers. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education.
21.
LeeA. (2011). A comparison of postsecondary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enrollment for students with and without disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 72-82.
22.
LindsayS.HounsellK. (2017). Adapting a robotics program to enhance participation and interest in STEM among children with disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12, 694-794.
23.
LindsayS.RampterabL.CurranC. (2019). Therapy through play: Advancing the role of robotics in paediatric rehabilitation. In HayreC.MullerD.SchererM. (Eds.), Everyday technologies in healthcare (pp. 11-30). New York, NY: CRC Press.
24.
LudiS.ReichlmayrT. (2011). The use of robotics to promote computing to pre-college students with visual impairments. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(3), 1-20.
25.
MelchiorA.BurackC.HooverM.HaqueZ. (2018). FIRST longitudinal study: Findings at 48 month follow-up. Waltham, MA: Center for Youth and Communities, Brandeis University.
MoonN.UtschigT.ToddR.BozzorgA. (2011). Evaluation of programmatic interventions to improve postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: Findings from SciTrain University. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 331-349.
28.
MoriartyM. (2007). Inclusive pedagogy: Teaching methodologies to reach diverse learners in science instruction. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40, 252-265.
29.
Mutch-JonesK.PuttickG.MinnerD. (2012). Lesson study for accessible science: Building expertise to improve practice in inclusive science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1012-1034.
RuskN.ResnickM.BergR.Pezalla-GranlundM. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science and Education in Technology, 17, 59-69.
33.
SkorinkoJ.DoyleJ. (2012). Do goals matter in engineering education? An exploration of how goals influence outcomes for FIRST robotics participants. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2, 9-20.
34.
StewartD.LawM.YoungN.ForhanM.HealyH.Burke-GaffneyJ.FreemanM. (2014). Complexities during transitions to adulthood for youth with disabilities: Person-environment interactions. Disability & Rehabilitation, 36, 1998-2004.
35.
TaylorR.KielhofnerG.SmithC.ButlerS.CahillS.CiukajM.GehmanM. (2009). Volitional change in children with autism: A single-case design study of the impact of hippo-therapy on motivation. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 25, 192-200.
36.
ThurstonL.ShumanC.MiddendorfB.JohnsonC. (2017). Postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: Lessons learned from a decade of NSF funding. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30, 49-60.
37.
YuenT.MasonL. L.GomezA. (2014). Collaborative robotics projects for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29, 51-62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
