A challenge of intervention research is the lack of a means to identify and measure clinical practice from an occupation-centered approach. The objective of this study is to establish basic psychometric properties of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment (OCIA). The study is approached by establishing content validity and utility through expert panel and two focus groups. Interrater reliability (IRR) was determined through standardized video analysis and Krippendorff’s alpha. Results from the expert panel and focus groups indicated an overall agreement that the OCIA was able to capture the full range of elements of rehabilitation-focused interventions for older adults (occupational, contextual, and personal relevance) and a good fit with the occupational therapy intervention process model. IRR found adequate level of agreement (α = .76). The OCIA has demonstrated initial basic psychometrics for observation of rehabilitation-focused interventions with older adults.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process 2nd edition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625-683.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2011). The philosophical base of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(Suppl.), S65.
3.
DeJongG.HsiehC.GassawayJ.HornS. D.SmoutR. J.PutmanK.. . . FoleyM. P. (2009). Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 1269-1283.
4.
DoucetB. M.WoodsonA.WatfordM. (2014). Moving toward 2017: Progress in rehabilitation intervention effectiveness research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, e124-e148. doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.011874
5.
FisherA. G. (1998). Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 509-521.
6.
FisherA. G. (2009). Occupational therapy intervention process model: A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
7.
FisherA. G. (2013). Occupation-centered, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different?Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20, 162-173.
8.
Fleming-CastaldyR. P.GillenG. (2013). Ensuring that education, certification, and practice are evidence based. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 364-369. doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.006973
9.
GeddieM.SchultzS.WhisnerS. (2015). Content validity of the Occupational Therapy Taxonomy of Rehabilitation Interventions (OT-TRI). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(Suppl. 1), 6911500191p1-6911500191p1. doi:10.5014/ajot.2015.69S1-PO6087
10.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
JackJ.EstesR. I. (2010). Documenting progress: Hand therapy treatment shift from biomechanical to Occupational Adaptation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 82-87.
13.
JewellV. (2012). The guide to authentic occupational therapy. Texas Woman’s University. Unpublished manual.
14.
JewellV. (2015). Occupation-centered practice in skilled nursing facilities: Myth or reality? (Texas Woman’s University, Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations (AAT 3712477).
15.
JewellV.D.PickensN.D.HerschG.JensenG. (2016). An exploration into occupation-centered pratice in skilled nursing facilities. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 34, 43-56.
16.
KielhofnerG. (2005). Scholarship and practice: Bridging the divide. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 231-239.
17.
KielhofnerG.BurkeJ. P. (1980). A model of human occupation, part 1. Conceptual framework and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 572-581. doi:10.5014/ajot.34.9.572
18.
LawM.BaptisteS. (2002). Working in partnership with our clients. In LawM.BaumC. M.BaptisteS. (Eds.), Occupation-based practice: Fostering performance and participation (pp. 17-26). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
19.
LawM.CooperB.StrongS.StewartD.RigbyP.LettsL. (1996). The Person-Environment-Occupational model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9-23.
20.
MuninM. C.PutmanK.HsiehC.-H.SmoutR. J.TianW.DeJongG.HornS. D. (2010). Analysis of rehabilitation activities within skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities after hip replacement for acute hip fracture. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 89, 530-540. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181e29f54
21.
NelsonD. L. (1988). Occupation: Form and performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 633-641.
PortneyL. G.WatkinsM. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
24.
SchkadeJ. K.SchultzS. (1992). Occupational adaptation: Toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, part 1. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 829-837. doi:10.5014/ajot.46.9.829
25.
Skubik-PeplaskiC.CarricoC.NicholsL.CheletteK.SawakiL. (2012). Behavioral, neurophysiological, and descriptive changes after occupation-based intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, e107-e113. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.003590
26.
Skubik-PeplaskiC.HowellD.HarrisonA. (2014). Becoming occupation-based: A case study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28, 431-443.
27.
Skubik-PeplaskiC. L.HowellD.HunterE. (2016). The environmental impact on occupational therapy interventions. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 30, 139-151.
28.
van den HeeverN. (2014, June). Occupation-based practice: Elusive concept or achievable goal?Oral sessions conducted from World Federation of Occupational Therapy, Yokohama, Japan.
29.
WoodW. (1998). It is jump time for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 403-411.
