BabbittS. (1996). Impossible dreams: Rationality, integrity, and moral imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2.
BailliardA. (2016). Justice, difference, and the capacity to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23, 3-16.
3.
DurocherE.GibsonB. E.RappoltS. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21, 418-430.
4.
DurocherE.RappoltS.GibsonB. E. (2014). Occupational justice: Future directions. Journal of Occupational Science, 21, 431-442.
5.
FrankG. (2012). Occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1),25-35.
6.
GalheigoS. M. (2010). Occupational therapy in the social field: Concepts and critical considerations. In KronenbergF.PollardN.SakellariouD. (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders, Volume 2 (pp. 47-56). Edinburgh, Scotland: Elsevier Science.
7.
GalheigoS. M. (2011). What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 60-66.
8.
GreeneM. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. London, England: Routledge.
9.
HammellK. W. (2016a). Critical reflections on occupational justice: Toward a rights-based approach to occupational opportunities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0008417416654501
10.
HammellK. W. (2016b). Occupational injustice: A critique. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0008417416638858
11.
HockingC. (2015). An occupational justice perspective of health. In WilcockA.HockingC. (Eds.), An occupational perspective on health (3rd ed., pp. 389-416). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
12.
HockingC. (In Press). Occupational justice as social justice: The moral claim for inclusion. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1).
13.
HockingC.TownsendE. (2015). Driving social change: Occupational therapists’ contributions to social justice. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 71, 68-71.
14.
JohnsonM. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
KinsellaE. A. (2012a). Knowledge paradigms in occupational science: Pluralistic perspectives. In WhitefordG.HockingC. (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 67-85). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
16.
KinsellaE. A. (2012b). Practitioner reflection and judgement as phronesis. In KinsellaE. A.PitmanA. (Eds.), Phronesis as professional knowledge: Practical wisdom in the professions (pp. 35-52). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.
17.
KinsellaE. A.CatyM. E.NgS.JenkinsK. (2012). Reflective practice for allied health: Theory and practice. In EnglishL. (Ed.), Adult education and health (pp. 210-228). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
18.
KinsellaE. A.WhitefordG. (2009). Knowledge generation and utilization: Toward epistemic reflexivity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56, 249-258.
19.
KuhnT. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In KuhnT. (Ed.), The essential tension (pp. 320-339). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
MalfitanoA. P.LopesR. E.MagalhãesL.TownsendE. A. (2014). Social occupational therapy: Conversations about a Brazilian experience. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81, 298-307.
21.
NgS.KinsellaE. A.FriesenF.HodgesB. (2015). Reclaiming a theoretical orientation to reflection in medical education research: A critical narrative review. Medical Education, 49, 461-475.
22.
PereiraR. B.WhitefordG. E. (in press). Advancing understandings of inclusion and participation through situated research. In PollardN.van BruggenH.KantarzisS. (Eds.), Occupation-based practice for social inclusion. London, England: Whiting & Birch.
23.
PollardN.SakellariouD.KronenburgF. (2009). A political practice of occupational therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
24.
SakellariouD.PollardN. (2013). A commentary on the social responsibility of occupational therapy education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37, 416-430.
25.
StadnykR.TownsendE.WilcockA. (2010). Occupational justice. In ChristiansenC. H.TownsendE. A. (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 329-358). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
26.
ThibeaultR. (2013). Occupational justice’s intents and impacts: From personal choices to community consequences. In CutchinM. P.DickieV. A. (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 245-256). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
27.
TownsendE. A.WilcockA. A. (2004a). Occupational justice. In ChristiansenC. H.TownsendE. A. (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 243-273). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
TownsendE. AWilcockA. A. (2004b). Occupational justice and client-centered practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 75-87.
29.
WhitefordG.PereiraR. (2012). Occupation, inclusion and participation. In WhitefordG.HockingC. (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp.187-207). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
30.
WhitefordG.TownsendE. (2011). Participatory occupational justice framework: Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In KronenburgF.PollardN.SakellariouD. (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders, Volume 2 (pp. 65-84). London, England: Elsevier.
31.
WilcockA. A. (2006). An occupational perspective on health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
32.
WilcockA. A.HockingC. (2015). An occupational perspective on health (3rd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2016). Revised minimum standards for the education of occupational therapists, Draft VI. WFOT Education Review Team. Available from http://www.wfot.com
35.
YoungI. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.