ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32.
2.
ArmstrongR.HallB. J.DoyleJ.WatersE. (2011). “Scoping the scope” of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33, 147-150.
3.
ClassenS.MonahanM.AutenB.YarneyA. (2014). Evidence-based review of interventions for medically at-risk older drivers. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(4), e107-114. doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.010975
4.
CookD. J.MultowC. D.HaynesR. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126, 376-380.
5.
CooperH. M.HedgesL. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
6.
GlassG. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
7.
GreenhalghT. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). British Medical Journal, 315, 672-675. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.672
8.
GrolR.GrimshawJ. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. The Lancet, 362, 1225-1230.
9.
JensenL. A.AllenM. A. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553-560.
10.
LawM. (Ed.). (2002). Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK.
11.
LawM.BaumC. (1998). Evidence-based occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 131-135.
12.
LevacD.ColquhounH.O’BrienK. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69-78.
13.
LinS. H.MurphyS. L.RobinsonJ. C. (2010). Facilitating evidence-based practice: Process, strategies, and resources. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 164-171.
14.
MallettR.Hagen-ZankerbJ.SlatercR.DuvendackdM. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4, 445-455.
15.
OttenbacherK. J. (2011, April). Evidence-based practice and knowledge translation in the era of healthcare reform: Opportunities for Occupational Therapy. Presented at the American Occupational Therapy Association’s 91st Annual Conference and Expo, Philadelphia, PA.
16.
OwensD. K.LohrK. N.AtkinsD.TreadwellJ. R.RestonJ. T.BassE. B.HelfandM. (2009). AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Healthcare Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(5), 513-523. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.009
17.
OxmanA. D.GuyattG. H. (1993). The science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academies of Science, 703, 125-133.
18.
PatersonB. L.ThorneS. E.CanamC.JillingsC. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
SackettD. L.RichardsonW. S.RosenbergW.HaynesR. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone.
20.
SackettD. L.RosenbergW. M.GrayJ. A.HaynesR. B.RichardsonW. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medicine Journal, 312, 71-72.
21.
SackettD. L.StrausS. E.RichardsonW. S.RosenbergW.HaynesR. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone.
22.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2003). Writing the proposal for a qualitative research methodology project. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 781-790.
23.
SandelowskiM.DochertyS.EmdenC. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365-371.
24.
StavW. B.ArbesmanM.LiebermanD. (2008). Background and methodology of the older driver evidence-based systematic literature review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 130-135.
25.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367.
26.
WhittemoreR. (2005). Combining evidence in nursing research: Methods and implications. Nursing Research, 54, 56-62.
27.
WhittemoreR.KnaflK. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 546-553.