ClassenS. (2015a). Editorial: Incubators of innovation, accelerators of opportunities. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(2), 3-4. doi:10.1177/1539449215578647
2.
ClassenS. (2015b). Editorial: Valuing the past, investing in the future. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(1), 3-4. doi:10.1177/1539449214562782
3.
HockingC. (2009). The challenge of occupation: Describing the things people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16, 140-150. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686655
4.
HuotS.Laliberte RudmanD. (2015). Extending beyond qualitative interviewing to illuminate the tacit nature of everyday occupation: Occupational mapping and participatory occupation methods. OTJR: Occupational, Participation and Health, 45(1), 27-33. doi:10.1177/1539449215576488
5.
Laliberte RudmanD. (2014). Embracing and enacting an “occupational imagination”: Occupational science as transformative. Journal of Occupational Science, 21, 373-388. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
6.
Laliberte RudmanD.DennhardtS.FokD.HuotS.MolkeD.ParkA.ZurB. (2008). A vision for occupational science: Reflecting on our disciplinary culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 136-146. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686623
7.
MolineuxM.WhitefordG. E. (2011). Occupational science: Genesis, evolution and future contribution. In DuncanE. A. S. (Ed.), Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (pp. 243-253). Sydney, Australia: Elsevier.
8.
PierceD. (2014). Occupational science: A powerful disciplinary knowledge base for occupational therapy. In PierceD. (Ed.), Occupational science for occupational therapy (pp. 1-10). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
9.
World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2012). Position statement: Occupational science (Revised). Retrieved from http://www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx