Community-based organizations have experienced an increased demand for new and expanded programs, as well as pressure from private and public sources of funding to document the impact of their services and programs. This article highlights the importance of a participatory and empowerment approach to evaluating a community health intervention. A five-phase approach to implementing an empowerment and participatory evaluation process is described using a research study. The five phases included developing a partnership and planning the evaluation, developing a logic model, identifying the methodology and data collection, interpreting and reporting findings, and monitoring and utilizing evaluation findings. In this research study, a WebTV community intervention was implemented to assist community residents in accessing health information and resources through the project's home web page and the Internet. A group of citizen leaders was provided with a WebTV unit, training, and ongoing support and assistance. Citizen leaders used the unit as a tool to obtain health information and resources and to advocate and support community action. Implications of empowerment and participatory evaluation of this type of community intervention are discussed for community occupational therapy, including occupational therapists as agents of change and facilitators of skills building and organizational capacity.
BalcazarF.KeysC.KaplanM. A.Suarez-BalcazarY. (1998). Participatory action research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 105–112.
2.
BalcazarF.KeysC.Suarez-BalcazarY. (2001). Empowering Latinos with disabilities to address issues of independent living and disability rights: A capacity building approach. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 21(2), 53–70.
3.
BoyceW.LysackC. (2000). Community participation: Uncovering its meaning in CBR. In ThomasM.ThomasM. J. (Eds.), Selected readings in community based rehabilitation: CBR in transition (series 1). Bangalore, India: Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal.
4.
BravemanB.HelfrichC.FisherG. S. (2001). Developing and maintaining community partnerships within a ‘scholarship of practice.’Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 15(1/2), 109–125.
5.
BrollierC. (1986). Program evaluation research: An administrative tool. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 2(4), 105–112.
6.
BucknerJ. C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 771–791.
7.
CarpinelloS. E.NewmanD. L.JatulisL. L. (1992). Health decision makers' perceptions of program evaluation: Relationship to purpose and information needs. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 15, 405–419.
8.
CockburnL.TrenthamB. (2002). Participatory action research: Integrating community occupational therapy practice and research. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 20–30.
9.
ConnellJ.KubischA. C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. In Fulbright-AndersonK.KubischA. C.ConnellJ. P. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 15–44). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
10.
CousinsJ. B.EarlL. M. (1995). The case for participatory evaluation: Theory, research, practices. In CousinsJ. B.EarlL. (Eds.), Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning (pp. 3–17). London: Falmer Press.
11.
DysartA. M.TomlinG. S. (2002). Factors related to evidence-based practice among U.S. occupational therapy clinicians. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 275–284.
12.
FawcettS. B.Paine-AndrewsA.FranciscoV. T.SchultzJ. A.RichterK. P.LewisR. K.. (1996). Empowering community health initiatives through evaluation. In FettermanD.KaftarianS.WandersmanA. (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 256–276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
FawcettS. B.WhiteG. W.BalcazarF. E.Suarez-BalcazarY.MathewsR. M.Paine-AndrewsA.. (1994). A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with physical disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 471–496.
14.
FettermanD. M. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15, 1–5.
15.
FettermanD. M. (2002). Empowerment evaluation: Building communities of practice and a culture of learning. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 89–102.
16.
FettermanD. M.KaftarianS.WandersmanA. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17.
FlaspohlerP.WandersmanA.KeenerD.North-MaxwellK.AceA.AndrewsA.. (2003). Promoting program success and fulfilling accountability requirements in a statewide community-based initiative: Challenges, progress, and lessons learned. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 26, 37–52.
18.
HolmM. B. (2000). Our mandate for the new millennium: Evidence-based practice. 2000 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 575–585.
19.
IsraelB. A.CheckowayB. N.SchultzA. J.ZimmermanM. A. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 149–170.
20.
JasonL. A.KeysC. B.Suarez-BalcazarY.TaylorR. R.DavisM. I.DurlakJ.. (Eds.). (2004). Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
JensenG. M.RoyeenC. B. (2001). Reflections on building community: A different perspective on academic-community partnerships using the integration matrix. Journal of Allied Health, 30, 168–175.
22.
JohnsonR. B. (1998). Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 93–110.
23.
KielhofnerG.HammelJ.FinlaysonM.HelfrichC.TaylorR. R. (2004). Documenting outcomes of occupational therapy: The Center for Outcomes Research and Education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 15–23.
24.
KingP. M. (1993). Outcome analysis of work-hardening programs. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 595–603.
25.
LawM.BaumC. (1998). Evidence-based occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 131–135.
26.
LettsL. (2003). Enabling citizen participation of older adults through social and political environments. In LettsL.RigbyP.StewartD.. Using environments to enable occupational performance (pp. 71–80). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
27.
LevineM.PerkinsD. V. (1987). Principles of community psychology: Applications and principles. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
LevitonL.HughesE. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluation: A review and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5, 525–548.
29.
LincolnY. S. (1992). Fourth generation evaluation: The paradigm revolution and health promotion. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 83(suppl 1), S6–S10.
30.
LinneyJ. A.WandersmanA. (1996). Empowering community groups with evaluation skills: The Prevention Plus III Model. In FettermanD.KaftarianS.WandersmanA. (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 256–276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31.
MasiC. M.Suarez-BalcazarY.CasseyM. Z.KinneyL.PiotrowskiZ. H. (2003). Internet access and empowerment: A community-based health initiative. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 525–530.
32.
MayerS. E. (1996). Building community capacity with evaluation activities that empower. In FettermanD.KaftarianS.WandersmanA. (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 256–276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
MilsteinB.ChapelT. (2002). Developing a logic model or theory of change. In RenaultV. & FawcettS. (Eds.), Community tool box (chapter 2: Section 7). Retrieved April 25, 2004, from http://ctb.ku.edu/tools/EN/chapter_1002.htm.
34.
OttenbacherK. J.Tickle-DegnenL.HasselkusB. R. (2002). Therapists awake! The challenge of evidence-based occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 247–249.
35.
PapineauD.KielyM. C. (1996). Participatory evaluation in a community organization: Fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 79–93.
36.
PosavacE. J.CareyG. (2003). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
RedickA. G.McClainL.BrownC. (2000). Consumer empowerment through occupational therapy: The Americans with Disabilities Act Title III. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 207–213.
38.
RobertsonS. C.RamsayD. (1995). Principles of consultation: Occupational therapy in community programs. In American Occupational Therapy Association, Conference Abstracts and Resources 1995 (pp. 25–26). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
39.
RogersE. S.Palmer-ErbsV. (1994). Participatory action research: Implications for research and evaluation in psychiatric evaluation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 18(2), 3–12.
40.
RoversR. (1986). The merging of participatory and analytical approaches to evaluation: Implications for nurses in primary health care programs. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 23, 211–219.
41.
SecretM.JordanA.FordJ. (1999). Empowerment evaluation as a social work strategy. Health & Social Work, 24, 120–127.
42.
SelenerD. (1997). Participatory action research and social change. New York: Cornell Participatory Action Research Network.
43.
ShapermanJ. (1989). The importance of program evaluation: Introduction to the evaluation of a community program for developmentally disabled adults. Occupational Therapy in Care, 6(2/3), 237–239.
44.
SmithM. K. (1998). Empowerment evaluation: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Evaluation and Programming Planning, 21, 255–261.
45.
Suarez-BalcazarY.DavisM.FerrariJ.NydenP.OlsonB.AlvarezJ.. (2004). University-community partnerships: A framework and an exemplar. In JasonL. A.KeysC. B.Suarez-BalcazarY.TaylorR. R.DavisM. I.DurlakJ., (Eds.) (pp. 105–120), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
Suarez-BalcazarY.HarperG. W.FerrariJ. R. (Eds.). (2003). Empowerment and participatory evaluation of community interventions: Multiple benefits. New York: The Haworth Press.
47.
Suarez-BalcazarY.HarperG.LewisR. (2005). A interactive and contextual model of community-university collaborations for research and action. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 84–101.
48.
Suarez-BalcazarY.KinneyL. (2002). Technology as a tool for facilitating community change. The Community Psychologist, 35, 25–27.
49.
Suarez-BalcazarY.Orellana-DamacelaL.PortilloN.LanumM.SharmaA. (2003). Implementing an outcomes model in the participatory evaluation of community initiatives. In Suarez-BalcazarY.HarperG. W.FerrariJ. R. (Eds.), Empowerment and participatory evaluation of community interventions: Multiple benefits (pp. 5–20). New York: The Haworth Press.
50.
TaylorR. T.BravemanB.HammelJ. (2004). Developing and evaluating community-based services through participatory action research: Two case examples. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 73–82.
51.
Tickle-DegnenL. (1999). Organizing, evaluating, and using evidence in occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 537–539.
52.
Tickle-DegnenL. (2000). What is the best evidence to use in practice?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 218–221.
53.
TownsendE.BirchD. E.LangleyJ.LangilleL. (2000). Participatory research in a mental health clubhouse. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 18–44.
WalkerR.CusikA. (1996). Development and preliminary evaluation of an early childhood community occupational therapy programme. The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 43(1), 3–12.
56.
WandersmanA.KeenerD.Snell-JohnsJ.MillerR.FlaspohlerP.Livet-DyeM.. (2004). Empowerment evaluation: Principles and action. In JasonL. A.KeysC. B.Suarez-BalcazarY.TaylorR. R.DavisM. I.DurlakJ., (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 139–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57.
WeissC. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In ConnellJ. P.KubischA.SchorrL.WeissC. H. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
ZimmermanM. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community level of analysis. In RappaportJ.SeidmanE. (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Plenum.
