The current study examines the effectiveness of an occupational therapy home modification intervention program by examining differences in self-reported occupational performance before and after intervention in a population of community-dwelling older adults with disabilities. An occupational therapy intervention was provided in the homes of 16 older adults with functional limitations. The intervention included changing the existing space by the provision of adaptive equipment and making architectural modifications (including major remodeling) to the home. No remediative treatment was provided. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used to measure satisfaction and performance in daily activities in the home before and after home modification intervention. Overall, the mean scores on the satisfaction and performance subscales indicated an improvement in performance and satisfaction with occupational performance. The average number of barriers in each home was 4.7. An average of only 2.5 barriers were solved during the intervention. The removal of environmental barriers from the homes of older adults who have functional limitations can significantly improve their occupational performance and their satisfaction with their ability to perform everyday activities.
Administration on Aging. (2001). A profile of older Americans: 2001. Washington, DC: Administration on Aging.
2.
American Association of Retired Persons. (2000). Fixing to stay: A national housing survey on housing and home modification issues. Retrieved October 13, 2003, from the AARP Research web site: http://research.aarp.org/il/home_mod_1.html.
3.
Center for Universal Design. (1997). A blueprint for action: A resource for promoting home modifications. Retrieved October 13, 2003, from http://www.homemods.org/library/blue.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). Healthy aging: Preventing disease and improving quality of life among older Americans. Atlanta, GA: Author.
5.
ChangW. C.ChanC.SlaughterS. E.CartwrightD. (1997). Evaluating the FONE FIM: Part II. Concurrent validity and influencing factors. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 1, 259–285.
6.
ChristiansenC. H.BaumC. M. (1997). Person—environment occupational performance: A conceptual model for practice. In ChristiansenC. H.BaumC. M. (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Enabling function and well-being (2nd ed., pp. 47–70). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
7.
ConnellB. R.SanfordJ. A. (2001). Difficulty, dependence, and housing accessibility for people aging with a disability. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 18, 234–242.
8.
FearingG.ClarkJ.StantonS. (1998). The client-centered occupational therapy process. In LawM. (Ed.), Client centered occupational therapy (pp. 67–87). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
9.
FogelB. S. (1992). Psychological aspects of staying at home. Generations, 16(2), 15–19.
10.
FriedL. P.GuralnikJ. M. (1997). Disability in older adults: Evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 92–100.
11.
GillT. M.WilliamsC. S.RobisonJ. T.TinettiM. E. (1999). A population-based study of environmental hazards in the homes of older persons. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 553–556.
12.
GillT. M.WilliamsC. S.TinettiM. E. (1995). Assessing risk for the onset of functional dependence among older adults: The role of physical performance. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43, 603–609.
13.
GitlinL.CorcoranM. (1993). Expanding caregiver ability to use environmental solutions for problems of bathing and incontinence in the elderly with dementia. Technology and Disability, 2(4), 12–21.
14.
GitlinL. N.CorcoranM.WinterL.BoyceA.HauckW. W. (2001). A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: Effect of efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of a person with dementia. Gerontologist, 41(1), 4–14.
15.
GuralnikJ. M.FerrucciL.SimonsickE. M.SaliveM. E.WallaceR. B. (1995). Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 556–561.
16.
HamiltonB. B.LaughlinJ. A.FiedlerR. C.GrangerC. V. (1995). Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26(3), 115–119.
17.
KeithR. A.GrangerC. V.HamiltonB. B. (1987). The Functional Independence Measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. In EisenbergM. G.GrzesiakR. C. (Eds.), Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation (pp. 6–18). New York: Springer.
18.
LawM.BaptisteS.CarswellA.McCollM. A.PolatajkoH.PollockN. (1994). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
19.
LawM.CooperB.StrongS.StewartD.RigbyP.LettsL. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(1), 9–23.
20.
LawtonM. P.NahemowL. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In EisdorferC.LawtonM. P. (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619–674). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
LysackC.MacNeillS.NeufieldS.LichtenbergP. (2002). Elderly inner city women who return home to live alone. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 22, 59–69.
22.
MannW. C.HurrenD.TomitaM.BengaliM.SteinfeldE. (1994). Environmental problems in homes of elders with disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 191–211.
23.
MannW. C.OttenbacherK. J.FraasL.TomitaM.GrangerC. V. (1999). Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Family Medicine, 8, 210–217.
24.
McCollM. A.PatersonM.DaviesD.DoubtL.LawM. (2000). Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 22–30.
25.
MillerD. K.CarterM. E.MillerJ. P.FornoffJ. E.BentleyJ. A.BoydS. D.. (1996). Inner-city blacks have high levels of functional disability. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44, 1166–1173.
26.
PetrellaR. J.OverendT.ChesworthB. (2002). FIM™ after hip fracture: Is telephone administration valid and sensitive to change?Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 639–644.
27.
SAS, Inc. (1996). SAS (Version 6.12) [Computer Software]. Cary, NC: Author.
28.
SatarianoW. (1997). The disabilities of aging: Looking to the physical environment. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 331–332.
29.
StarkS. (2001). Creating disability in the home: The role of environmental barriers in the United States. Disability and Society, 16(1), 37–49.
30.
SteinfeldE.DanfordG. S. (1997). Environment as a mediating factor in functional assessment. In DittmarS.GreshamG. (Eds.), Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional (pp. 37–56). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
