This study addresses how help is provided for pupils with physical disabilities and how school assistants influence their participation in school. Data were collected through field observations and interviews with seven pupils between 7 and 15 years old and with each pupil's teacher and assistant. The analysis resulted in a description of features that influenced how help was provided and the consequences in school for the pupil with disabilities. A major finding was that the assistants could both facilitate and hinder participation. We concluded that an awareness of the priority the pupils place on social participation with their peers is needed to ensure effective and flexible support is made available to pupils with disabilities.
AinscowM. (2000). The next step for special education: Supporting the development of inclusive practices. British Journal of Special Education, 27, 76–80.
2.
ArmstrongR. W.RosenbaumP. L., & KingB. A. (1992). Self-perceived social function among disabled children in regular classrooms. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 11–16.
3.
AskheimO. P. (1999). Personal assistance for disabled people: The Norwegian experience. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8, 111–119.
BarronK. (1995). The transition from adolescence to adulthood for physically disabled young people. (Report No. 2). Uppsala, Sweden: Centre for Disability Research at Uppsala University: Repro HSC.
6.
BlumR. W.ResnickM. D.NelsonR., & GermaineA. S. (1991). Family and peer issues among adolescents with spina bifida and cerebral palsy. Pediatrics, 88, 280–285.
7.
BogdanR., & BiklenS. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8.
BrownleaA. (1987). Participation: Myths, realities and prognosis. Social Science and Medicine, 25, 605–614.
9.
DeweyJ. (1991). Individ, skola och samhälle: Pedagogiska texter [The individual, the school and the society: A pedagogical text] (2nd ed.). Stockholm, Sweden: Natur och Kultur.
10.
DuncanB., & BrownS. (Eds.). (1993). Personal assistance services in Europe and North America. Oakland, CA: Rehabilitation International and World Institute on Disability.
11.
DunnW.BrownC., & McGuiganA. (1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect on context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 595–607.
12.
ElkindD. (1976). Barn och unga i Piagets psykologi [Children and adolescents: Interpretative essays on Jean Piaget]. Stockholm, Sweden: Natur och Kultur.
13.
FuligniA. J. (1998). Authority, autonomy, and parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion: A study of adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, Filipino, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 34, 782–792.
14.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.LuiselliT. E., & MacFarlandS. Z. C. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.
15.
GlinerJ. A. (1994). Reviewing qualitative research: Proposed criteria for fairness and rigor. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 78–90.
16.
GoughR., & ModigM. (1995). Leva med personlig assistans [Living with personal assistance]. Centrum för utvärdering av socialt arbete. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
17.
GustavssonA. (2000). Tolkning och tolkningsteori 1: Introduktion [Interpretations and theory of interpretation 1: Introduction]. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University Department of Education.
18.
HemmingssonH., & BorellL. (2000). Accommodation needs and student-environment fit in upper secondary school for students with severe physical disabilities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 162–172.
19.
HemmingssonH., & BorellL. (2002). Environmental barriers in mainstream schools. Child Care, Health and Development, 28, 57–63.
20.
HemmingssonH.BorellL., & GustavssonA. (1999). Temporal aspects of teaching and learning: Implications for pupils with physical disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 1, 26–43.
21.
JerwoodL. (1999). Using special needs assistants effectively. British Journal of Special Education, 26, 127–129.
22.
KielhofnerG. (1995). A model of human occupation: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
23.
KreftingL. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222.
24.
LandauS. I. (Ed.). (1997). The new international Webster's concise dictionary of the English language. Naples, FL: Trident Press International.
25.
LewinB. (1998). Funktionshinder och medborgarskap [Disabilities and citizenship]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Uppsala, Department of Social Medicine. Stockholm, Sweden: Gotab.
26.
McAnarneyE. (1985). Social maturation: A challenge for handicapped and chronically ill adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 6, 90–101.
27.
Ministry of Social Affairs. (1998). FUNKIS: Funktionshindrade elever i skolan [FUNKIS: Students with disabilities in the school setting]. (SOU 1998:66). Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedsts.
28.
Ministry of Social Affairs. (1999). Lindqvists nia [Number nine of Lindqvist]. (SOU 1999:21). Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts.
29.
MyersD. G. (1999). Social psychology (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill College.
30.
NucciL. P.KillenM., & SmetanaJ. G. (1996). Autonomy and the personal: Negotiation and social reciprocity in adult-child social exchanges. New Directions for Child Development, 73, 7–24.
31.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
QvarsellB. (1976). Utvecklingspsykologi och pedagogik: Begreppsdiskussioner och problemidentifieringar [Developmental psychology and pedagogics: Discussions about concepts and identification of problems]. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University Department of Education, Stockholm, Sweden.
34.
SkärL., & TammM. (2001). My assistant and I: Disabled children's and adolescents' roles and relationships to their assistants. Disability and Society, 16, 917–931.
35.
StevensS. E.SteeleC. A.JutaiJ. W.KalninsI. V.BortolussiJ. A.BiggarW. D. (1996). Adolescents with physical disabilities: Some psychosocial aspects of health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 157–164.
36.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, World Conference on Special Needs Education. (1994). The Salamanca Statement on principles, policy and practice in special needs education. Salamanca, Spain: Author.
37.
United Nations General Assembly. (1989). The Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: United Nations. Resolution 44/25. Retrieved February 20, 2002, from http://www.unicef.org/voy/meeting/rig/convent.html.
38.
United Nations General Assembly. (1993). The United Nations standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations. Resolution 48/96.
39.
VanderZanden J. W. (1997). Human development (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
WestbomL. (1992). Well-being of children with chronic illness: A population-based study in a Swedish primary care district. Acta Paediatrica, 81, 625–629.
41.
WilliamsL. J., & DowningJ. E. (1998). Membership and belonging in inclusive classrooms: What do middle school students have to say?Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23, 98–110.
42.
World Heath Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
