A Methodology for Developing Evidence about Meaning in Occupation: Exploring the Meaning of Working

Abstract

Using research-based evidence to support practice is becoming a standard of care. Although occupational therapists believe that occupation can be used as a therapeutic agent to promote health and well-being in their clients, there is only limited research to support this. One reason for this is the difficulty in quantitatively constructing “occupation” for research. This article describes one method that can be used to quantitatively measure meaning, an important indicator of occupation. This study explicates the “meaning” of working as examined through three interconnected constructs of work meaning (work centrality, societal norms about working, and valued work outcomes) and provides an exemplar study in which these three constructs were used to examine the meaning of working in a group of telecommunication workers. The Meaning of Working Survey was used to gather information from 170 telecommunication workers. Data from the survey were analyzed using both descriptive methods and cluster analysis. By evaluating these three constructs, it was possible to identify trends and patterns of the meaning of working for this group of workers. They did not view work as a central life role and viewed working as a constraint or a reciprocal arrangement. They valued benefits and wages over intrinsic outcomes. The cluster analysis revealed that meaning was generally related to external outcomes. The discussion focuses on how this methodology for measuring meaning could be used to develop research on the meaning of occupation and its effect on health outcomes. This study provides occupational therapy researchers with one quantitative methodology for examining the meaning of working and an exemplar on how that methodology has been used in research on meaning and occupation.

Keywords

work centrality beliefs valued outcomes communication workers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. Bethesda, MD: Author.

Applebaum

(1992). The concept of work: Ancient, medieval, and modem. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Baker

N. A.

, & Jacobs

(in press). The nature of working in the U.S. Work.

Baker

N. A.

Jacobs

, & Carifio

(1999/2000). The ability of background factors, work practices, and psychosocial variables to predict the severity of musculoskeletal discomfort. Occupational Ergonomics, 2(1), 27–41.

Baker

N. A.

Jacobs

, & Tickle-Degnen

(2003). The association between the meaning of working and musculoskeletal discomfort. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31, 235–247.

Borg

(1990). Multiple facetisations of work values. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 401–412.

Burke

P. J.

(1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56, 836–849.

Carlson

Fanchiang

S.-P.

Zemke

, & Clark

(1996). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of occupational therapy for older persons. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 89–98.

Claes

, & Quintanilla

Ruiz S. A.

(1994). Initial career and work meaning in seven European countries. The Career Development Quarterly, 42, 337–352.

10.

Clark

Azen

S. P.

Zemke

Jackson

Carlson

Mandel

(1997). Occupational therapy for independent-living older adults. JAMA, 278, 1321–1326.

11.

Coetsier

, & Whitely

(1995). The relationship between occupational/supervisory hierarchical position and the meaning of working: A six country comparison. Psychologica Belgica, 35, 1–40.

12.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

13.

Elizur

(1984). Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 379–389.

14.

England

G. W.

(1991). The meaning of working in the USA: Recent changes. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 1, 111–124.

15.

Hales

T. R.

Sauter

S. L.

Peterson

M. R.

Fine

L. J.

Putz-Anderson

Schleifer

L. R.

(1994). Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal users in a telecommunications company. Ergonomics, 37, 1603–1621.

16.

Hasselkus

B. R.

, & Rosa

S. A.

(1997). Meaning and occupation. In Baum

C. L.

(Ed.), Enabling function and well-being (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.

17.

Holm

M. B.

(2000). Our mandate for the new millennium: Evidence-based practice, 2000 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 575–585.

18.

Jahoda

(1981). Work, employment, and unemployment. American Psychologist, 36, 184–191.

19.

Kreitler

, & Kreitler

(1990). The cognitive foundation of personality traits. New York: Plenum Press.

20.

Law

(2002). Assessing roles and competence. In Radomski

M. V.

(Ed.), Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.

21.

Law

Steinwender

, & LeClaire

(1998). Occupation, health, and well-being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 81–91.

22.

Lundberg

C. D.

, & Peterson

M. F.

(1994). The meaning of working in U.S. and Japanese local governments at three hierarchical levels. Human Relations, 47, 1459–1487.

23.

Meleis

A. I.

Norbeck

J. S.

, & Laffrey

S. C.

(1989). Role integration and health among female clerical workers. Research in Nursing, 12, 355–364.

24.

Meaning of Work International Research Team. (1987). The meaning of working. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.

25.

Meaning of Work International Research Team. (1999). The Meaning of Working Home Page. Retrieved September 30, 2001, from http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~rclaes/MOW/index.html.

26.

Nelson

(1988). Occupation: Form and performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 633–641.

27.

Primeau

L. A.

(1996). Work and leisure: Transcending the dichotomy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 569–577.

28.

Pryor

(1982). Values, preferences, needs, work ethics, and orientations to work: Toward a conceptual and empirical integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 20, 40–52.

29.

Roberson

(1990). Function of work meaning in organizations: Work meanings and work motivation. In Nord

W. R.

(Ed.), Meaning of occupational work (pp. 107–134). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

30.

Rousseau

(1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organization. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.

31.

Quintanilla

Ruiz S. A.

, & Claes

(2000). MOW research programs. In Katz

J. A.

(Ed.), Databases for the study of entrepreneurship (Vol. 4, pp. 335–391). Stamford, CT: JAI Press Inc.

32.

Quintanilla

Ruiz S. A.

, & England

G. W.

(1996). How working is defined: Structure and stability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 515–540.

33.

Simon

R. W.

(1997). The meanings individuals attach to role identities and their implications for mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 256–274.

34.

Spencer

Daybell

P. J.

Eschenfelder

Khalaf

Pike

J. M.

, & Woods-Petitti

(1998). Contrasting perspective on work: An exploratory qualitative study based on the concept of adaptation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 474–484.

35.

Strong

(1998). Meaningful work in supportive environments: Experiences with the recovery process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 31–38.

36.

Thoits

(1995). Identity-relevant events and psychological symptoms: A cautionary tale. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 72–82.

37.

Tickle-Degnen

(1998). Using research evidence in planning treatment for the individual client. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 152–159.

38.

Trombly

C. A.

(1995). Occupation: Purposefulness and meaning-fulness as therapeutic mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 960–972.

39.

Verbrugge

L. M.

(1983). Multiple roles and physical health of women and men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 16–30.

40.

Warr

(1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

41.

Wickrama

Conger

R. D.

Lorenz

F. O.

, & Matthews

(1995). Role identity, role satisfaction, and perceived physical health. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 270–283.

42.

Wilcock

A. A.

(1998). An occupational perspective on health. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

43.

Yerxa

E. J.

(1991). Nationally speaking: Seeking a relevant, ethical, and realistic way of knowing for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 199–204.

44.

Yerxa

E. J.

Clark

Frank

Jackson

Parham

Pierce

(1989). An introduction to Occupational Science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6, 1–17.