Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A cluster analysis of scores of 1961 children on the Sensory Integration and Praxis (SIPT) tests was performed to explore subgroupings of children referred for SIPT testing, and to provide information concerning the validity of the six profiles currently used in the SIPT interpretation process. The results yielded a five rather than a six cluster solution, including the following profiles: Low-average Bilateral Integration and Sequencing; Dyspraxia; Generalized Sensory Integration Dysfunction and Dyspraxia-Severe; Generalized Sensory Integration Dysfunction and Dyspraxia-Moderate, and Average Sensory Integration and Praxis. Clinical implications of the results of this study related to SIPT interpretation are discussed.

Keywords

sensory integration dysfunction evaluation research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres

A.J.

(1969). Deficits in sensory integration in educationally handicapped children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2, 160–168.

Ayres

A.J.

(1971). Characteristics of types of sensory integration dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 329–334.

Ayres

A.J.

(1972a). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A.J.

(1972b). Types of sensory integration dysfunction among disabled learners. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26,13–18.

Ayres

A.J.

(1972c). Southern California Sensory Integration Tests, Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A.J.

(1977). Cluster analysis of measures of sensory integration. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 362–366.

Ayres

A.J.

(1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A.J.

(1989). Sensory integration and praxis tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A.J.

Mailloux

, & Wendler

C.L.

(1987). Developmental dyspraxia: Is it a unitary function? Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7, 93–110.

10.

Ayres

A.J.

, & Marr

D.B.

(1991). Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. In Fisher

Murray

, & Bundy

(Eds.), Sensory integration theory and practice (pp. 201–232). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

11.

Cermak

(1991). Somatodyspraxia. In Fisher

Murray

, & Bundy

(Eds.), Sensory integration theory and practice (pp 138–168). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

12.

Cummins

(1991). Sensory integration and learning disabilities: Ayres' factor analyses reappraised. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(3), 160–168.

13.

Fisher

, & Murray

(1991). Introduction to sensory integration theory. In Fisher

Murray

, & Bundy

(Eds.), Sensory integration theory and practice (pp 3–24). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

14.

Fisher

, & Bundy

(1991). The interpretation process. In Fisher

Murray

, & Bundy

(Eds.), Sensory integration theory and practice (pp. 234–249). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

15.

Hoehn

, & Baumeister

(1994). A critique of the application of sensory integration therapy to children with learning disabilities. journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(6), 338–350.

16.

Lai

Fisher

Magalhaes

, & Bundy

(1996). Construct validity of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 6(2), 75–97.

17.

Mulligan

(1996). An analysis of score patterns of children with attention disorders on the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(8), 647–654.

18.

Mulligan

(1998). Patterns of sensory integration dysfunction: A confirmatory factor analyses. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(10), 819–828.

19.

Parham

L. D.

, & Mailloux

(1996). Sensory integration. In Case-Smith

Allen

, & Pratt

(Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (pp. 307–356). St. Louis: Mosby.

20.

SPSS Inc. (1998). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Base 8.0. Chicago: Author.

Cluster Analysis of Scores of Children on the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References