Participatory research, also known as participatory action research, has its roots in communities around the world, particularly in Africa, Asia, and South America. The fundamental characteristics are that people who have experienced oppression become researchers. They generate knowledge and disseminate findings through consciousness raising, social critique, and social change with the explicit aim of transforming their oppression into empowerment. Through participatory research, people with long standing mental health problems, for example, may be able to transform their oppression into empowerment. Articles on participatory research generally report a single research project. This paper analyzes a portion of the data from a two-year institutional ethnography of a participatory research program. Presented here is an analysis that: 1) addresses the questions: What is research? and Who is driving research? and, 2) offers a critical perspective on the social organization of knowledge (and ruling power) when members and staff of a mental health clubhouse take up research as an occupation. Highlighted are power inequities between participants and the importance of social critique in participatory research. The paper includes reflections on participatory research as a form of client-centered practice in which clubhouse members and staff can engage together in a meaningful occupation.
AnthonyW.CohenM., & CohenB. (1983). Philosophy, treatment process, and principles of the psychiatric rehabilitation approach. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 6, 67–68.
2.
BeardJ.H.PropstR.N. & MalamudT.J. (1982). The Fountain House model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 1, 47–53.
3.
CampbellM., & ManicomA. (1995). Knowledge, experience, and ruling relations: Studies in the social organization of knowledge. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1991). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications.
6.
CheslerM.A. (1991). Participatory action research with self-help groups: An alternative paradigm for inquiry and action. Special issue: Self-help groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 757–768.
7.
ClarkC.ScottE., & KrupaM.A. (1993). Involving clients in program evaluation and research: A new methodology for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 192–199.
8.
CornwallA., & JewkesR. (1995). What is participatory research?Social Science and Medicine, 4,(12), 1667–1776.
9.
Department of National Health and Welfare, & Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1983). Guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Ottawa, ON.
10.
Department of National Health and Welfare, & Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1986). Intervention guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Ottawa, ON.
11.
Department of National Health and Welfare, & Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1987). Toward outcome measures in occupational therapy. Ottawa, ON.
12.
BordaFals O., & RahmanM.A. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. NY: Apex.
13.
FayB. (1987). Critical social science: Liberation and its limits. New York: Cornell University Press.
14.
FernandesW., & TandonR. (1981). Participatory research and evaluation: Experiments in research as a process of liberation. New Deli: Indian Social Institute.
15.
FlorinP., & WandersmanA. (1990). An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41–54.
16.
FreireP. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In Hall (Eds.), Creating Knowledge: A Monopoly: Participatory Research in Development. Toronto, ON and New Delhi: International Council on Adult Education, 29–40.
17.
GaventaJ. (1988). Participatory research in North America. Convergence, 21 (2/3), 9–28.
18.
GreenwoodD.J.WhyteW.R., & HarkavyI. (1992). Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Special issue: Action research. Human Relations, 46, 175–192.
19.
HageyR.S. (1997). The use and abuse of participatory action research. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 18 (1), 1–4.
20.
HallB.L. (1981). Participatory research, popular knowledge and power: A personal reflection. Convergence, 14 (3), 6–17.
21.
HallB.L. (1984). Research, commitment and action: The role of participatory research. International Review of Education, 289–299.
22.
HallB.L. (1992). From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. The American Sociologist, 23, 15–28.
23.
Health Canada, & Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1993). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred mental health practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications.
24.
ICCD-International Center for Clubhouse Development. (1997). What is a clubhouse? Report on the 1996 ICCD Clubhouse Survey. New York: Fountain House, Inc.
25.
IsraelB.A.SchurmanS.J., & HugentoblerM.K. (1992). Conducting action research: Relationships between organization members and researchers. Special issue: Intervention with groups in organizations, Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 28, 74–101.
26.
KirbyS. & McKennaK. (1989). Experience, research, social change: Methods from the margins. Toronto: Garamond Press.
27.
KrupaT., & ClarkC.C. (1995). Occupational therapists as case managers: Responding to current approaches to community mental health service delivery. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 12–22.
28.
LangilleL.BirchD.DavidM.LangleyJ.QueijaN.SewellP., & TownsendE. (1997). New voices in research: Part I: 25, Research stories from Connections Clubhouse. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Connections Clubhouse, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre.
29.
LawM. (1995). Client-centered practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 250–257.
LawM.BaptisteS., & MillsJ. (1995). Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 250–257.
32.
LibermanR. (1988). Coping with chronic mental disorders: A framework for hope. In LibermanR., (Ed.), Psychiatric Rehabilitation of Chronic Mental Patients. Washington, DC: American Psychological Press, 1–23.
33.
LippsG., & GrantP.R. (1990). A participatory method of assessing program implementation. Evaluation Review, 14, 427–437.
34.
MaguireP. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst, MA: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
35.
McLeanPetras E., & PorporaD.V. (1993). Participatory research: Three models and an analysis. American Sociologist, 24, 107–126.
36.
McTaggartR. (1994). Participation action research: Issues in theory and practice. Educational Action Research, 2, 313–337.
37.
ParkP.Brydon-MillerM.HallB., & JacksonE.T. (Eds.). (1993). Voices for change: Participatory research in North America. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
38.
ReardonK.WelshJ.KreiswirthB., & ForesterJ. (1993). Participatory action research from the inside: Community development practice in East St. Louis. The American Sociologist, Spring, 69–91.
RogersE.S., & Palmer-ErbsV. (1994). Participatory action research: Implication for research and evaluation in psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 18 (2), 3–12.
41.
SimonsonL.J., & BushawV.A. (1993). Participatory action research: Easier said than done. The American Sociologist, Spring, 27–37.
42.
SmithD.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
43.
SmithD.E. (1990a). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routledge.
44.
SmithD.E. (1990b). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto, On: University of Toronto Press.
45.
SohngS.L. (1992). Consumers as research partners, journal of Progressive Human Services, 3, 1–14.
46.
SumsionT. (1993). Client-centred practice: The true impact. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 6–8.
47.
TandonR. (1981). Social transformation and participatory research. Convergence, 2(3), 5–8.
48.
TandonR. (1988). Participatory research in the empowerment of people. Convergence, 4(3), 20–27.
49.
TownsendE. (1992). Institutional ethnography: Explicating the organization of professional health practices intending empowerment. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 83 (Supplement 1), S58–S61.
50.
TownsendE. (1993). Occupational therapy's social vision. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 174–184.
51.
TownsendE. (1996a). Institutional ethnography: A method for analyzing the context of practice. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 16, 179–199.
52.
TownsendE. (1996b). Enabling empowerment: Using real versus simulated occupations. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 114–138.
53.
TownsendE. (1997). Promoting inclusiveness: A community dimension of spirituality. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 146–155.
54.
TownsendE. (1998a). Good intentions overruled: A critique of empowerment in the routine organization of mental health services. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
55.
TownsendE. (1998b). Reflections of occupational therapy language: Matters of respect, accountability, and leadership. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 45–49.
56.
TownsendE.BirchD.DavidM.LangleyJ.QueijaN., & LangilleL. (1997). New voices in research. Part II: Integrated research findings, 1995–1997. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Connections
57.
Clubhouse, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre.
58.
TownsendE., & WilcockA. (1999). Occupational justice. Workshop Presentation, Australian Association of Occupational Therapists Annual Conference, Canberra, Australia.
59.
WallersteinN., & BernsteinE. (1994). Introduction to community empowerment, participatory education, and health. American Health Education Quarterly, 21, 141–148.
60.
WhyteW.F. (1991). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
