Quantitative Evaluation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Abstract

Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is usually predicted on the basis of measuring the maximum diameter. However, since the size of a normal aorta varies depending on each individual, this indicator does not seem to be ideal. The authors propose a new indicator for the enlargement of aorta and have started clinical application of this technique.

The abdominal aortic diameter was measured by using two-dimensional ultrasonography in 261 adults (aged 20 and over). The control group consisted of subjects with no evident aortic dilatation. Patients with AAA were divided into the nonruptured group and the ruptured group.

Analysis of the data from the control group revealed that the abdominal aortic diameter could be defined by the following equation: Diameter (mm) = 0.147 x age (years) + 0.169 x height (cm) - 15.9. The baseline diameters of the abdominal aorta were calculated by applying the age and height of individual subjects in this equation. The measured diameter was divided by the baseline diameter to obtain the aortic expansion index (AEI). If a cut-off value of the aneurysm diameter and the AEI (calculated by using age 20) for the prediction of significant risk of rupture is set at 44.2 mm (= mean - 2SD of the aneurysm diameter in the ruptured group) and at 2.7 (= mean - 2SD of the AEI in the ruptured group), the risk of rupture based on the diameter in the nonruptured group is underestimated in 11% of cases. However, when the risk of rupture is based on the AEI, the risk is not underestimated in any case in the nonruptured group.

The authors conclude that the AEI is a useful indicator for quantitatively evaluating the risk of rupture of an AAA.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Kanaoka Y , Ohgi S , Mori T : Age-related changes in the abdominal aortic diameter. Vasc Surg 28:349-358, 1994.

2. Limet R , Sakalihassan N , Albert A : Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 14:540-548, 1991.

3. Miall WE , Lovell HG : Relation between change of blood pressure and age. Br Med J 2:660-664, 1967.

4. Bader H : Dependence of wall stress in the human thoracic aorta on age and pressure. Circulation Res 20:354-364, 1967.

5. Murata H : Angiometric study of aorta. Part 1, Biometric study of the aorta and the relationship of the aortic dimensions with the height, body weight, and cardiac weight. J Juzenkai 35:2469-2540, 1930.

6. Naruo M , Inoguchi S , Kimura T , et al: Age-related changes in the arterial girth in adults. Showa Med J 36:233-242, 1976.

7. Muraki N : Ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta: Evaluation of intramural thrombi in abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Jpn Coll Angiol 23:401-413, 1983.

8. Collin J : A proposal for a precise definition of abdominal aortic aneurysm: A personal view. J Cardiovasc Surg 31:168-169, 1990.

9. Pederson OM : Ultrasound measurement of the luminal diameter of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease. J Vasc Surg 17:596-601, 1993.

10.

10. Pearce WH : Aortic diameter as a function of age, gender, and body surface area. Surgery 114:691-697, 1993.

11.

11. Otsu S : Arterial changes: Age-related changes. Ronenbyo 6:38-52, 1962.

12.

12. Nakajima T , Tanikawa J , Yamamoto H , et al: Senility and atherosclerosis of the human aorta. J Jpn Coll Angiol 12:85-91, 1972.

13.

13. Sato A , Hotta H : Age-related changes in physiologic functions of the vascular wall. Gendai Iryo 23:2371-2377, 1991.