In-Situ vs Reversed Vein Grafts: Is There a Difference?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Kunlin J : Le traitement de l'arterite obliterante par la greffe veineuse. Arch Mal Coeur 42:371-373, 1949.

2. Hall KV : Great saphenous vein used in situ as an arterial shunt after valve extirpation: The method and immediate result. Acta Chir Scand 128:365-386, 1964.

3. May AG , DeWeese JA , Rob CG : Arterialized in situ saphenous vein. Arch Surg 91:743-750, 1965.

4. Leather RP , Powers SR , Karmody AM : A reappraisal of the in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass: Its use in limb salvage. Surgery 86:453-461, 1979.

5. Gruss JD , Bartels D , Vargas H , et al: Arterial reconstruction for distal disease of the lower extremities by the in situ vein graft technique. J Cardiovasc Surg 23:231-234, 1982.

6. Bush HL , Nabseth DC , Curl GR , et al: In situ saphenous vein bypass grafts for limb salvage: A current fad or a viable alternative to reversed vein bypass grafts? Am J Surg 149:477-480, 1985.

7. Fogle MA , Whittemore AD , Couch NP , et al: A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 5:46-52, 1987.

8. Hurley JJ , Auer Al , Binnington HB , et al: Comparison of initial salvage in 98 consecutive patients with either reversed autogenous or in situ vein bypass graft procedures. Am J Surg 150:777-780, 1985.

9. Taylor LM , Phinney ES , Porter JM : Present status of reversed vein bypass for lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg 3:288-297, 1986.

10.

10. Taylor LM , Edwards JM , Phinney ES , et al: Reversed vein bypass to infrapopliteal arteries. Ann Surg 205:90-97, 1987.

11.

11. Leather RP , Shah DM , Chang BB , et al: Resurrection of the in situ saphenous vein bypass: 1000 cases later. Ann Surg 208:435-442, 1988.

12.

12. Calligaro KD , Friedell ML , Rollins DL , et al: A comparative review of in situ versus reversed vein grafts in the 1980s. Surg Gynecol Obstet 172:247-252, 1991.

13.

13. Geisel Theodore S. (Dr. Seuss) : The Butter Battle Book. New York: Random House, Inc, 1964.

14.

14. Denton MJ , Hill D , Fairgrieve J : In situ femoropopliteal and distal vein bypass for limb salvage—experience of 50 cases. Br J Surg 70:358-361, 1983.

15.

15. Leather RP , Shah DM , Buchbinder D : Further experience with the saphenous vein used in situ for arterial bypass. Am J Surg 142:506-510, 1981.

16.

16. Bush HL Jr , Hong SI , Deykin D , et al: The effect of surgical trauma on prostacyclin production by vein grafts. Surg Forum 33:463-465, 1982.

17.

17. Bush HL Jr , Corey CA , Nabseth DC : Distal in situ saphenous vein grafts: Increased operative blood flow and postoperative patency. Am J Surg 145:542-548, 1983.

18.

18. Ku DN , Klafta JM , Gewertz BL , et al: The contribution of valves to saphenous vein graft resistance. J Vasc Surg 6:274-279, 1987.

19.

19. Bandyk DF , Johnson BL , Gupta AK , et al: Nature and management of duplex abnormalities encountered during infrainguinal vein bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg 24:430-438, 1996.

20.

20. Cambria RP , Megerman J , Abbott WM : Endothelial preservation in reversed and in situ autogenous vein grafts: A quantitative experimental study. Ann Surg 202:50-55, 1985.

21.

21. Sayers RD , Watt PAC , Muller S , et al: Endothelial cell injury secondary to surgical preparation of reversed and in situ saphenous vein bypass grafts. Eur J Vasc Surg 6:354-361, 1991.

22.

22. Cambria RP , Megerman J , Brewster DC , et al: The evolution of morphologic and biomechanical changes in reversed and in-situ vein grafts. Ann Surg 205:167-174, 1987.

23.

23. Gupta AK , Bandyk DF , Cheanvechai D , et al: Natural history of infrainguinal vein graft stenosis relative to bypass grafting technique. J Vasc Surg 25:211-225, 1997.

24.

24. Tullis MJ , Primozich J , Strandness DE Jr : Detection of “functional” valves in reversed saphenous vein by pass grafts: Identification with duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 25:522-527, 1997.

25.

25. Giannoukas AD , Androulakis AE , Labropoulos N , et al: The role of surveillance after infrainguinal bypass grafting. Eur J Vasc Surg 11:279-289, 1996.

26.

26. Mills JL : Mechanisms of vein graft failure: The location, distribution, and characteristics of lesions that predispose to graft failure. Sem Vasc Surg 6:78-91, 1993.

27.

27. Gentile AT , Lee RW , Moneta GL , et al: Results of by-pass to the popliteal and tibial arteries with alternative sources of autogenous vein. J Vasc Surg 23:272-280, 1996.

28.

28. Shah DM , Darling RC , Chang BB , et al: Long-term results of in situ saphenous vein bypass: Analysis of 2058 cases. Ann Surg 222:438-448, 1995.

29.

29. Watelet J , Cheysson E , Poels D , et al: In situ versus reversed saphenous vein for femoropopliteal bypass: A prospective randomized study of 100 cases. Ann Vasc Surg 1:441-452, 1986.

30.

30. Veterans Administration Study Group 141 : Comparative evaluation of prosthetic, reversed, and in situ vein bypass grafts in distal popliteal and tibial-peroneal revascularization. Arch Surg 123:434-438, 1988.

31.

31. Wengerter KR , Veith FJ , Gupta SK , et al: Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of in situ and reversed vein infrapopliteal bypasses. J Vasc Surg 13:189-199, 1991.

32.

32. Moody AP , Edwards PR , Harris PL : In situ versus reversed femoropopliteal vein grafts: Long term followup of a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 79:750-752, 1992.

33.

33. Pomposelli FB Jr , Marcaccio EJ , Gibbons GW , et al: Dorsalis pedis arterial bypass: Durable limb salvage for foot ischemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 21:375-384, 1995.

34.

34. Neale ML , Graham JC , Lane RJ , et al: The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial by-pass grafts. J Am Coll Surg 178:155-163, 1994.

35.

35. Schneider JR , Walsh DM , McDaniel MD , et al: Pedal bypass versus tibial bypass with autogenous vein: A comparison of outcome and hemodynamic results. J Vasc Surg 17:1029-1040, 1993.

36.

36. Lundell A , Lindblad B , Bergquist D , et al: Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: A prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 21:26-34, 1995.

37.

37. Bandyk DF , Kaebnick HW , Stewart GW , et al: Durability of the in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass: A comparison of primary and secondary patency. J Vasc Surg 5:256-268, 1987.

38.

38. Nehler MR , Moneta GL , Yeager RA , et al: Surgical treatment of threatened reversed infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 20:558-565, 1994.

39.

39. Swift J : Polite conversation, Dialogue I. In: Bartlett J: Bartlett's Familiar Quotations. Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1980, p 323-323.