Bandyk DF, Schmitt DD, Seabrook GR, et al: Monitoring functional patency of in situ saphenous vein bypasses: The impact of a surveillance protocol and elective revision. J Vasc Surg9:286-296, 1989.
9.
Panetta TF, Marin ML, Veith FJ, et al: Unsuspected preexisting saphenous vein disease. An unrecognized cause of vein bypass failure. J Vasc Surg15:102-112, 1992.
10.
Chesire Njw , Wolfe Jhn, Baradas MA, et al: Smoking and plasma fibrinogen, lipoprotein (a) and serotonin are markers for postoperative infrainguinal grafts stenosis . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg11:479, 1996.
11.
Nielsen TG, von Jessen F., Andreasen JJ, et al: Antibodies to Cardiolipin increase the risk of failure of infrainguinal vein bypasses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (in press).
Cohen JR, Mannick JA, Couch NP, et al: Recognition and management of impending vein-graft failure. Importance for long-term patency. Arch Surg121:758-759, 1986.
14.
Belkin M., Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, et al: Observations of the use of thrombolytic agents for thrombotic occlusions of infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg11:289-296, 1990.
15.
Moody P., Gould DA, Harris PL: Vein graft surveillance improves patency in femoropopliteal bypass. Eur J Vasc Surg4:117-121, 1990.
16.
Disselhoff B., Buth J., Jakimowicz J.: Early detection of stenosis of femoro-distal grafts. A surveillance study using color-duplex scanning. Eur J Vasc Surg3:43-48, 1989.
17.
Berkowitz H. , HobbsCh, Roberts B., et al: Value of routine vascular laboratory studies to identify vein graft stenoses. Surgery90:971-979, 1989.
18.
Sladen JG, Gilmour JL: Vein graft stenosis: Characteristics and effect of treatment. Am J Surg41:549-553, 1981.
19.
Whittemore AD, Clowes AW, Couch NP, et al: Secondary femoropopliteal reconstruction . Ann Surg193:35-42, 1981.
20.
Harris PL, deCossart LM, Moody P., et al: How can we detect and manage fibrous strictures within new grafts? Are these more problematic with reversed than in situ bypass? In: Limb Salvage and Amputation for Vascular Disease, ed. by Greenhalgh RM, Jamieson CW , Nicolaides AN.London: WB Saunders, 1988, pp 221-231.
21.
Bandyk DF, Johnson BL, Gupta AK, et al: Nature and management of duplex abnormalities encountered during infrainguinal bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg24:430-438, 1996.
22.
Chalmers Rta , Haballah JJ, Kresowik TF, et al: The impact of color duplex surveillance on the outcome of lower limb bypass with segments of arm veins. J Vasc Surg19:279-288, 1994.
23.
Lalak NJ, Hanel KC, Hunt J., et al: Duplex scan surveillance of infrainguinal prosthetic bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg20:637-641, 1994.
24.
Lundell A., Lindblad B., Bergqvist D., et al: Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: A prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg21:26-34, 1995.
25.
Herzer in discussion. Lundell, et al: J Vasc Surg21:26-34, 1995.
26.
Breslau RC, DeWeese JA: Successful endophlebectomy of autogenous venous bypass grafts. Ann Surg162:251-254, 1965.
27.
McNamara JJ , Darling RC, Linton RR: Segmental stenosis of saphenous vein autografts: Preventable cause of late occlusion in arterial reconstruction. N Engl J Med277:290-292, 1967.
28.
Bandyk DF, Bergamini TM, Towne JB, et al: Durability of vein graft revision: The outcome of secondary procedures. J Vasc Surg13:200-210, 1991.
29.
Harris PL, Moody AP: The management of vein bypass strictures. In: The Maintenance of Arterial Reconstruction, ed. by Greenhalgh RM, Hollier LM.London: WB Saunders1991, pp 169-179.
30.
Perler BA, Osterman FA, Mitchell SE, et al: Balloon dilatation versus surgical revision of infra-inguinal autogenous vein graft stenosis longterm follow-up. J Cardiovasc Surg31:656-667, 1990.
31.
Whittemore AD, Donaldson MC, Polak JF, et al: Limitations of balloon angioplasty for vein graft stenosis. J Vasc Surg14:340-345, 1991.
32.
Sanchez LA, Suggs WD, Marin ML, et al: Is percutaneous balloon angioplasty appropriate in the treatment of graft and anastomotic lesions responsible for failing vein bypasses?Am J Surg168:97-101, 1994.
33.
Idu MM, Blankensteyn JD, de Gier P., et al: Impact of a color-flow duplex surveillance program on infrainguinal vein graft patency. A five-year experience. J Vasc Surg17:42-53, 1993.
34.
Sumner DS, Standness DE: Hemodynamic studies before and after extended bypass grafts to the tibial and peroneal arteries. Surgery86:442-452, 1979.
35.
O'Mara CS, Flinn WR, Johnson ND, et al: Recognition and surgical management of patent but hemodynamically failed arterial grafts. Ann Surg193:467-476, 1981.
36.
Wolfe Jhn, Thomas ML, Jamieson CW, et al: Early diagnosis of femorodistal graft stenosis. Br J Surg74:268-270, 1987.
37.
Mills JL, Harris JE, Taylor LM, et al: The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: A study of 379 reversed vein grafts. J Vasc Surg12:379-389, 1990.
38.
Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR, Mildenhauer P., et al: Hemodynamics of vein graft stenosis. J Vasc Surg8:688-695, 1988.
39.
Barnes RW, Thompson BW, MacDonald CM, et al: Serial noninvasive studies do not herald postoperative failure of femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass grafts. Ann Surg210:486-494, 1989.
40.
Green RM, McNamarra J., Ouriel K., et al: Comparison of infrainguinal graft surveillance techniques. J Vasc Surg11:207-215, 1990.
41.
Nielsen TG: Natural history of infrainguinal vein bypass stenoses. Early lesions increase the risk of thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg12:60-64, 1996.
42.
Brennan JA, Walsh Akm, Beard JD, et al: The role of simple noninvasive testing in infrainguinal vein graft sumeillance. Eur J Vasc Surg5:13-17, 1991.
43.
Bandyk DF: Postoperative surveillance of infrainguinal bypass. Surg Clin North Am70:71-85, 1990.
44.
Idu MM, Truyen E., Buth J.: Surveillance of lower extremity vein grafts. Eur J Vasc Surg6:456-462, 1992.
45.
Taylor PR, Wolfe Jhn, Tyrrell MR, et al: Graft stenosis: Justification for 1-year surveillance. Br J Surg77: 1125-1128, 1990.
46.
Wyatt MG, Muir RM, Tennant WG, et al: Impedance analysis to identify the "at risk" femorodistal graft . J Vasc Surg13:284-293, 1991.
47.
Sladen JG, Reid Jds, Cooperberg PL, et al: Color flow duplex screening of infrainguinal grafts combining low- and high-velocity criteria. Am J Surg158:107-112, 1989.
48.
Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, Hodgson KJ, et al: Does correction of stenosis indentified with color duplex scanning improve infrainguinal graft patency?J Vasc Surg17:54-66, 1993.
Taylor PR, Tyrrell MR, Crofton M., et al: Color flow imaging in the detection of femorodistal graft and native artery stenosis. Improved criteria. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg6:232-236, 1992.
51.
Davies AH, Magee TR, Tennant Sgw, et al: Criteria for identification of the "at-risk" infrainguinal bypass graft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg8:315-319, 1994.
52.
Buth J., Disselhoff B., Sommeling C., et al: Color-flow duplex criteria for grading stenosis in infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg14:716-728, 1991.
53.
Moneta GL, Yeager RA, et al: Accuracy of lower extremity arterial duplex mapping. J Vasc Surg15:275-284, 1992.
54.
Moody P., deCossart LM, Douglas HM, et al: Asymptomatic strictures in femoropopliteal vein grafts. Eur J Vasc Surg3:389-392, 1989.
55.
Harris PL: Vein graft surveillance. All part of the service. Br J Surg89:97-98, 1992.
56.
Mills JL, Bandyk DF, Gahtan V., et al: The origin of infrainguinal vein graft stenosis. A prospective study based on duplex surveillance. J Vasc Surg21:16-25, 1995.
57.
Ho GG, Moll FL, Kuipers MM, et al: Long-term surveillance by duplex scanning of non-reversed infragenicular graft stenosis. AnnuVasc Surg9:547-553, 1995.
58.
Tessler FN, Kimme-Smith C., Sutherland ML, et al: Inter- and intra-observer variability of Doppler peak velocity measurements: In-vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol16:653-657, 1990.
59.
Wilson YG, Davies AH, Currie IC, et al: The value of pre-discharge scanning in infrainguinal graft surveillance . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg10:237-242, 1996.
60.
Giannoukas AD, Androulakis AK, Labropoulos N., et al: The role of surveillance after infrainguinal bypass grafting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg11:279-289, 1996.
61.
Mohan CR, Hoballah JJ, Schueppert MT, et al: Should all in situ saphenous vein bypasses undergo permanent duplex scanning?Arch Surg130:483-488, 1995.
62.
Sanchez LA, Gupta SK, Veith FJ, et al: A ten-year experience with one hundred fifty failing or threatened vein and polytetrafluoroethylene arterial bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg14:729-738, 1991.
63.
Dunlop P., Hartshorne T., Bolia A., et al: The long-term outcome of infrainguinal vein graft surveillance . Eur J Endovasc Surg10:352-355, 1995.
64.
Golledge J. , Beattie DK, Greenhalgh RM, et al: Have the results of infrainguinal bypass improved with the widespread utilization of postoperative surveillance?Eur J Endovasc Surg11:388-392, 1996.
65.
Gibbons GW, Burgess AM, Guadagnoli E., et al: Return to well-being and function after infrainguinal revascularization . J Vasc Surg21:35-45, 1995.
66.
Currie IC, Wilson YG, Baird RN, et al: Treatment of intermittent claudication. The impact on quality of life. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg10:356-361, 1995.
67.
Bandyk DF, Sumner DS, Thiele BL, et al: Study for surveillance of infrainguinal arterial bypass. J Vasc Surg15:899-900, 1992.