Comparison of Aortography,Computed Tomography,and Magnetic Resonance in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Abstract

During a three-year period 51 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) computed tomography (CT) and aortography to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and role of each study.

Ct and MRI were 100% accurate in establishing the diagnosis of AAA, whereas aortography did not visualize the AAA in 3 patients nor the associated iliac aneurysms in 3 other patients. MRI and aortography were superior to CT in evaluating the celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries.

CT should be the screening method of choice to identify AAA, and when operation is contemplated, aortography will best demonstrate the mesenteric and renal anatomy. If aortography is deemed too hazardous, MRI will yield the most information and should then be the noninvasive test of choice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kadir S. , Athanasoulis CA , Brewster DC , et al: Tender pulsatile abdominal masses. Arch Surg 115:631-633, 1980.

Gomes MN , Haddal HG , Schellinger D. : Ultrasonography and CT scanning: A comparitive study of abbdominal aortic aneurysms. Comput Tomog 2:99-109, 1978.

Tones WE , Mauer DE , Steinberg HV , et al: CT of aortic aneurysms: The distinction between mural and thrombus calcification. AJR 150:1317-1319, 1988 .

Koslin DB , Kenney PJ , Koehler RE , et al: Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm by MR imaging with aortography correlation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 11:329-335, 1988.

Johnston WK , Scobie TK : Multicenter prospective study of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Population and operative management. J Vasc Surg 7:69-81, 1988.

Ouriel K. , Fiore WM , Geary JE : Detection of occult colonic ischemia during aortic procedures: Use of an intraoperative photoplethysmographic technique. J Vasc Surg 7:5-9, 1988.