Abstract
The microcirculatory evolution of healing wounds has not been well documented. The authors tested the generally accepted hypothesis that an end-to-end, stapled anastomosis (EEA) causes less microcirculatory compromises to the wound edge than an end-on, single-layer, hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) does. The quanti tative measurement of the microcir culation associated with hand-sewn and stapled colonic anastomoses was carried out in two groups of dogs, each containing 28 animals. The mi crocirculatory evolution with use of either technique was similar, and the data in this study failed to support the common belief that the "B" shape of the staples results in mini mal trauma to the microcirculation and thus allows capillary growth through the tissue enclosed by the staple. In contrast to other studies, however, the authors noticed cross- circulation as early as the third post operative day in either technique. Moreover, by this angiographic method, they noted a gradual in crease in the extent of cross-circula tion from days 3 to 13 in both types of anastomoses. To their knowledge this study represents the first report of a comparison of trauma caused to the microcirculation by mechanical su tures and single-layer, hand-sewn technique.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
