Szilagyi, D.E. , Elliott, J.P., Hageman, J.H., et al.: Biologic fate of autogenous vein implants as arterial substitutes. Ann. Surg.,178: 232, 1973.
2.
Dardik, H., Dardik, I.I.: Successful arterial substitution with modified umbilical vein. Ann. Surg.,183: 252, 1976.
3.
Dardik, H., Ibrahim, I.M., Baier, R., et al.: Human umbilical cord—a new source for vascular prosthesis . J. Am. Med. Assoc.,236: 2859, 1976.
4.
Dardik, I.J. , Ibrahim, I.M., Dardik, H.: Experimental and clinical use of human umbilical cord vessels as vascular substitutes. J. Cardiovasc. Surg.,18: 555, 1977.
5.
Dardik, H., Ibrahim, I.M., Dardik, I.: Evaluation of glutaraldehyde-tanned human umbilical cord vein as a vascular prosthesis for bypass to the popliteal, tibial, and peroneal arteries. Surgery,83: 577, 1978.
6.
Lee, B.Y., Trainor, F.S., Kavner, D., et al.: Evaluation of modified human umbilical vein as an arterial substitute in femoropopliteal reconstructive surgical procedures. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.,147: 721, 1978.
7.
Dardik, H., Ibrahim, I.M., Sussman, B., et al.: Glutaraldehyde-stabilized umbilical vein prosthesis for revascularization of the legs. Am. J. Surg.,138: 234, 1979.
8.
Darling, R.C. , Linton, R.R.: Durability of femoropopliteal reconstructions . Am. J. Surg.,123: 472, 1972.
DeWeese, J.A. , Rob, Ch.G. : Autogenous venous grafts ten years later. Surgery,82: 775, 1977.
11.
Naji, A., Barker, C.F., Berkowitz, H.D., et al.: Femoropopliteal vein grafts for claudication analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg.,188: 79, 1978.
