Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is associated with high in-hospital mortality and the need for immediate surgical intervention. Larger hospital size may be associated with better patient care and surgical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effect of hospital size on TAAD outcomes.

Method

Patients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from Q4 2015-2020. NIS stratifies hospital size into small, medium, and large based on the number of hospital beds, geographical location, and the teaching status of the hospitals. Patients admitted to small/medium and large hospitals were stratified into two cohorts. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare in-hospital outcomes, adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics including procedural volume.

Results

There were 1106 and 3752 TAAD admitted to small/medium and large hospitals, respectively. Among patients admitted to small/medium hospitals, there was higher mortality (17.27% vs 14.37%, aOR = 1.32, P < 0.01), but shorter length of stay (P < 0.01) and lower cost (P = 0.03) compared to larger hospitals. There was no difference in morbidities.

Conclusions

Marked higher mortality is associated with admission to smaller hospitals among patients with TAAD, which may in turn decrease the average hospital stay and cost. Given that a significant percentage of patients are already being transferred out of the initial hospital and small/medium hospital is associated with higher mortality, centralization of care in centers of excellence may decrease the high mortality associated with TAAD.

Keywords

type A aortic dissection hospital size mortality centralized care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lombardi

Hughes

Appoo

, et al. Society for vascular surgery (SVS) and society of thoracic surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(3):723-747. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.013.

Aalberts

JJJ

Boonstra

van den Berg

Waterbolk

. In-hospital mortality and three-year survival after repaired acute type A aortic dissection. Neth Heart J. 2009;17(6):226-231.

Chiappini

Tan

Morshuis

Kelder

Dossche

Schepens

. Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: is advanced age a contraindication? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(2):585-590. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.01.027.

Bavaria

Brinster

Gorman

Woo

Gleason

Pochettino

. Advances in the treatment of acute type A dissection: an integrated approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(5).

Obel

Lindholt

Lasota

, et al. Clinical characteristics, incidences, and mortality rates for type A and B aortic dissections: a nationwide Danish population-based cohort study from 1996 to 2016. Circulation. 2022;146(25):1903-1917. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061065.

Trimarchi

Nienaber

Rampoldi

, et al. Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: the international registry of acute aortic dissection experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(1):112-122. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.005.

Daily

Trueblood

Stinson

Wuerflein

Shumway

. Management of acute aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg. 1970;10(3):237-247. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(10)65594-4.

Mussa

Horton

Moridzadeh

Nicholson

Trimarchi

Eagle

. Acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;316(7):754-763. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.10026.

Harris

Nienaber

Peterson

, et al. Early mortality in type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(10):1009-1015. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2718.

10.

Brescia

Patel

Likosky

, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in surgical and endovascular repair of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(5):1299-1306. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.047.

11.

Chikwe

Cavallaro

Itagaki

Seigerman

DiLuozzo

Adams

. National outcomes in acute aortic dissection: influence of surgeon and institutional volume on operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(5):1563-1569. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.039.

12.

Chan

Hart

Goodman

. Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries. J Rural Health. 2006;22(2):140-146. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00022.x.

13.

Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) NIS notes. Accessed August 10, 2023.https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_bedsize/nisnote.jsp

14.

Elixhauser

Steiner

Harris

Coffey

. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8-27. doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004.

15.

Finks

Osborne

Birkmeyer

. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128-2137. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1010705.

16.

El Amrani

Clément

Lenne

, et al.

Should all pancreatic surgery be centralized regardless of patients’ comorbidity?

HPB. 2020;22(7):1057-1066. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.2443.

17.

Sheetz

Dimick

Nathan

. Centralization of high-risk cancer surgery within existing hospital systems. J Clin Orthod. 2019;37(34):3234-3242. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02035.

18.

Sheetz

Massarweh

. Centralization of high-risk surgery in the US: feasible solution or more trouble than it is worth? JAMA. 2020;324(4):339-340. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2953.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Smaller Hospital Size is Associated With Higher Mortality in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection