A Comparison of Outcome in Patient With and Without Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET)

Abstract

Background

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a preoperative risk stratification tool providing an objective measure of fitness and functional capacity. There is however little evidence on the use of this compared to non-physiological test in vascular surgery despite its current use. This study investigates whether CPET perioperatively has value alongside non-physiological testing for patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

Method

Retrospective data was collected at 2 vascular centres between 2015-2019 in a CPET centre vs non-CPET centre in patients undergoing elective AAA repair. Outcomes measured included: length of stay in an intensive care unit (ICU); total length of stay; post-operative complications and acute kidney injury (AKI). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software.

Results

There were 38 patients at each centre. The mean duration of stay in ICU for patients in CPET centre was 2.5 ± 2.13 days whilst in non-CPET centre it was 3.68 ± 4.08 days (P = 0.05). The mean duration of stay in ICU and total length of stay was significantly shorter in CPET centre (P = 0.05 and P = 0.015 respectively). Mortality in CPET centre was 2.63% and 5.26% in non-CPET centre (not significant). The number of patients developing AKI post-operatively was 13.61% in CPET vs 28.95% in non-CPET centre.

Conclusion

CPET tested patients have statistically significant lower length of total and ICU stay compared to non-CPET patients. CPET is therefore a useful adjunct in selecting patients for open surgery compared to non-physiological testing. This study provides some evidence on the use of this routinely but not validated assessment tool in aortic aneurysm repair.

Keywords

aneurysms CPET outcome mortality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Marc

Cronenwett

. The UK small aneurysm trial. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(2):443.

Dalman

. The 2019 update of the European abdominal aortic aneurysm guidelines. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(3):633-634.

Priebe

. Preoperative cardiac management of the patient for non-cardiac surgery: an individualized and evidence-based approach. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:83-96.

Barakat

Shahin

McCollum

Chetter

. Prediction of organ specific complications following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(6):679-685.

W Grant

Hickey

Wisely

. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and survival after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(3):430-436.

Young

Karthikesalingam

Huddart

et al. A systematic review of the role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44(1):64-71.

Smith

Stonell

Purkayastha

Paraskevas

. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk assessment method in non-cardiopulmonary surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:883-893.

Hennis

Meale

Grocott

. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the evaluation of perioperative risk in non-cardiopulmonary surgery. Postgrad medical journal. 2011;87:550-557.

Hartley

Pichel

Grant

, et al. Preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing and risk of early mortality following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1539-1546.

10.

Carlisle

Swart

. Mid-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery predicted by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Br J Surg. 2007;94:966-969.

11.

Nugent

Riley

Megarry

O’Reilly

MJG

MacMahon

Lowry

. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the pre-operative assessment of patients for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ir J Med Sci. 1998;167:238-241.