Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Saphenous Vein Stripping for the Treatment of Recurrent Lower Extremity Venous Insufficiency

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficiency and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and saphenous vein stripping (SVS) for the treatment of recurrent lower extremity chronic superficial venous insufficiency (CSVI).

Methods

Patients who underwent SVS and RFA for recurrent lower extremity CSVI following RFA and patients who had 2-year follow-up results were enrolled into the study. Total, 37 patients who underwent a second RFA session with 2-year follow-up results were available. Then 37 patients were selected from 88 patients who underwent SVS for recurrent lower extremity CSVI to achieve a 1:1 ratio for comparison. Groups were compared based on preoperative properties, operative parameters, postoperative outcomes, complications and follow-up results.

Results

Duration of the procedure was 20.7 minutes in the RFA group and 30.7 minutes in the SVS group (P = .001). Postoperative pain at first hour, sixth hour and 24^th hour were significantly lower in patients who underwent RF (P = .001 for each parameter). Moreover, hospitalization time (18.1 hours vs 24.6 hours, P = .001) and time to return to normal daily activities (1.6 days and 2.5 days, P = .001) were significantly shorter in the RFA group. Success of the procedure did not statistically significant at first year follow-up (P = .304). However, success was significantly higher for the SVS group at second year follow-up (73% for RFA group and 91.9% for SVS group, P = .032).

Conclusion

We achieved significantly shorter procedure time, less postoperative hospitalization time, and a shorter time to return to daily activities with RFA. In contrast, the success rate of SVS was significantly higher at the second year follow-up, but not the first year follow-up in comparison with RFA.

Keywords

lower extremity radiofrequency ablation saphenous vein stripping venous insufficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Youn

Lee

. Chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins of the lower extremities. Korean J Intern Med. 2019;34(2):269-283. doi:10.3904/kjim.2018.230.

Robertson

Evans

Fowkes

FGR

. Epidemiology of chronic venous disease. Phlebology. 2008;23(3):103-111. doi:10.1258/phleb.2007.007061.

Raffetto

Mannello

. Pathophysiology of chronic venous disease. Int Angiol. 2014;33(3):212-221.

Azar

Rao

Oropallo

. Chronic venous insufficiency: a comprehensive review of management. J Wound Care. 2022;31:510-519.

Azar

Rao

Oropallo

. Chronic venous insufficiency: a comprehensive review of management. J Wound Care. 2022;31(6):510-519. doi:10.12968/jowc.2022.31.6.510.

Borghese

Pisani

Di Centa

. Endovenous radiofrequency for chronic superficial venous insufficiency: Clinical outcomes and impact in quality of life. J Med Vasc. 2021;46(1):3-8. doi:10.1016/j.jdmv.2020.11.003.

Marrocco

Atkins

Bohannon

Warren

Buckley

Bush

. Endovenous ablation for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency and venous ulcerations. World J Surg. 2010;34(10):2299-2304. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0659-1.

Kam

Tan

. Results of long saphenous vein stripping. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(12):639-642.

Helmy ElKaffas

ElKashef

ElBaz

. Great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation versus standard stripping in the management of primary varicose veins-a randomized clinical trial. Angiology. 2011;62(1):49-54. doi:10.1177/0003319710380680.

10.

Rautio

Ohinmaa

Perala

, et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):958-965. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.123096.

11.

Pearce

Ryan

Drummond

Thomas

Timmons

Sharp

. Comparing the costs of three prostate cancer follow-up strategies: a cost minimisation analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(2):879-886. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2857-8.