Background: The outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are constantly reported in a multitude of studies; however, the specific causes of perioperative stroke have been scarcely investigated. The aim of the present study was to analyze and categorize the causes of perioperative strokes after CEA. Methods: All CEAs performed from 2006 to 2019 in a single center were collected. CEA was routinely performed under general anesthesia, with routine shunting and patching, using cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring. Carotid exposure technique was classified as either clamped-dissection (CD) or preclamping-dissection (PCD) if the carotid bifurcation was dissected after or prior to carotid clamping. Perioperative and 30-day strokes and their possible mechanisms were evaluated according to preoperative symptoms and surgical technique adopted. Results: Among 1760 CEAs performed, 30 (1.7%) perioperative strokes occurred. 14 (47%) were identified upon emergence from general anesthesia, and 16 (53%) were noted in the first 30 days following intervention. Stroke etiology was categorized as follows: technical (acute thrombosis or intimal flap or due to intraoperative complications), embolic (no recognized technical defect), hemorrhagic, or contralateral. Symptomatic patients had a significantly higher rate of any type of stroke than asymptomatic patients (3.8% vs 0.9%, P = .0001). CD was protective for postoperative stroke (0.9% vs 3.1%, P = .001) in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (2.5% vs 5.9%, P = .05; 0.4% vs 1.9%, P = .005), particularly for the cohort in which symptomatic patients (0.7% vs 3.2%, P = .04) suffered postoperative embolic stroke. Conclusion: Perioperative stroke in CEA may be multifactorial in etiology, including a result of technical errors. A CD technique may help reduce the incidence of perioperative stroke.
KresowikTFHemannRAGrundSL, et al. Improving the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy: results of a statewide quality improvement project. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(5):918-926. doi:10.1067/mva.2000.106418.
2.
RothenbergKATuckerL-YGologorskyRC, et al. Long-term stroke risk with carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(20):983-991. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.124.
3.
de BorstGJMollFLvan de PavoordtHDWMMauserHWKelderJCAckerstafRGA. Stroke from carotid endarterectomy: when and how to reduce perioperative stroke rate?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21(6):484-489. doi:10.1053/ejvs.2001.1360.
4.
ParaskevasKIRobertsonVSaratzisANNaylorAREditor's choice - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following eversion vs. conventional carotid endarterectomy in randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018;55(4):465-473. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.12.025.
5.
BennettKMScarboroughJEShortellCK. Predictors of 30-day postoperative stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy using the 2012 carotid endarterectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):103-111. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.100.
6.
NaylorARRiccoJBde BorstGJ, et al.Editor's choice - management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 clinical practice guidelines of the european society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018;55(1):3-81. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021.
7.
PratesiCDorigoWInnocentiAA, et al. Reducing the risk of intraoperative neurological complications during carotid endarterectomy with early distal control of the internal carotid artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28(6):670-673. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.015.
8.
YoshidaKKurosakiYFunakiT, et al. Surgical dissection of the internal carotid artery under flow control by proximal vessel clamping reduces embolic infarcts during carotid endarterectomy. World Neurosurgery. 2014;82(1-2):e229-e234. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.018.
9.
PiniRFaggioliGLonghiM, et al. Impact of postoperative transient ischemic attack on survival after carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(6):1570-1576. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.048.
10.
PiniRFaggioliGLonghiM, et al. The detrimental impact of silent cerebral infarcts on asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(1):15-24. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.049.
11.
van SwietenJCKoudstaalPJVisserMCSchoutenHJvan GijnJ. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604-607.
12.
PiazzaMZavattaMLamainaM, et al. Early outcomes of routine delayed shunting in carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(3):334-341. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.06.030.
13.
HuibersACalvetDKennedyF, et al. Mechanism of procedural stroke following carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting within the international carotid stenting study (ICSS) randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(3):281-288. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.017.
14.
BourkeBMCrimminsDS. Early control of the distal internal carotid artery during endarterectomy: achievability and results. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(1):70-74. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.122028.
15.
KondovSBeyersdorfFSchöllhornJ, et al. Outcome of near-infrared spectroscopy-guided selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy in general anesthesia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;61:170-177.
16.
PennekampCWAImminkRVden RuijterHM, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy to indicate selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46(4):397-403.
