Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Iliac Artery Tortuosity and Calcification

Abstract

Introduction:

During endovascular aneurysm repair, the iliac artery typically serves as a conduit for device delivery. The degree of tortuosity and calcification in the iliac artery ultimately determines whether the device can successfully traverse the vessel. These 2 parameters can be assessed using qualitative approaches or calculated using quantitative methods based on the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards. The objective of this study was to determine whether qualitative methods are sufficient to accurately assess iliac artery tortuosity and calcification by calculating interobserver variability and comparing them to the SVS Reporting Standards.

Methods:

Three vascular surgeons reviewed preoperative computed tomography scans for 50 patients who underwent fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and qualitatively assessed left and right iliac artery tortuosity and calcification. Iliac artery geometries were segmented from these image sets. Tortuosity index and calcification length ratio were calculated and categorized based on the SVS Reporting Standards.

Results:

Interobserver variability was calculated for the qualitative assessments using interclass correlation coefficients. For tortuosity index, among the 3 observers, good agreement was found for the left iliac artery and fair agreement was found for the right. For calcification length ratio, excellent agreement was found for both iliac arteries. When compared to the quantitative assessment, the qualitative assessments underpredicted tortuosity in 2.3% of cases, matched the quantitative values in 16.7% of cases, and overpredicted tortuosity in 81.0% of cases. The qualitative assessments underpredicted calcification in 46.3% of cases, matched the quantitative values in 49.3% of cases, and overpredicted calcification in 4.3% of cases.

Conclusion:

Qualitative assessment of iliac artery tortuosity showed fair-to-good interobserver agreement and poor agreement to SVS Reporting Standards. Qualitative assessment of iliac artery calcification showed excellent interobserver agreement and fair agreement to SVS Reporting Standards. These trends should be considered when qualitative reporting methodologies are used.

Keywords

calcification iliac arteries qualitative assessment SVS Reporting Standards tortuosity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Murray

Ghosh

Khwaja

Murphy

Baguneid

Walker

. Access for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13(6):754–761.

Rahimi

O’Donnell

Graham

. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with extreme iliac artery tortuosity. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;44(6):472–474.

Carpenter

Baum

Barker

. Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(6):1050–1054.

Taudorf

Jensen

Vogt

Grønvall

Schroeder

Lönn

. Endograft limb occlusion in EVAR: iliac tortuosity quantified by three different indices on the basis of preoperative CTA. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48(5):527–533.

Speelman

Bohra

Bosboom

EMH

. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(1):105–109.

Maier

Gee

Reeps

Eckstein

H-H

Wall

. Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2010;9(5):511–521.

Bowman

Silverberg

Ellozy

. The role of anatomic factors in predicting success of endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;44(2):101–104.

Crawford

Sanford

Doyle

Wheatcroft

Amon

Forbes

. Prediction of advanced endovascular stent graft rotation and its associated morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(2):348–355.

Crawford

Doyle

Amon

Forbes

. Impact of insertion technique and iliac artery anatomy on fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. (submitted).

10.

Sanford

Crawford

Genis

Doyle

Forbes

Amon

. Predicting rotation in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair using finite element analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2018;140(9):091004–1–091004–8.

11.

Kristmundsson

Sonesson

Resch

. A novel method to estimate iliac tortuosity in evaluating EVAR access. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(2):157–164.

12.

Fillinger

Racusin

Baker

. Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: implications for rupture risk. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(6):1243–1252.

13.

Masuda

Caps

Singh

. Effect of ethnicity on access and device complications during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(1):24–29.

14.

Rockman

Lamparello

Adelman

. Aneurysm morphology as a predictor of endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: do smaller aneurysm have better outcomes? Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16(5):644–651.

15.

Wolf

Tillich

Lee

Rubin

Fogarty

Zarins

. Impact of aortoiliac tortuosity on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation of 3D computer-based assessment. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(4):594–599.

16.

Chaikof

Fillinger

Matsumura

. Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1061–1066.

17.

Chaikof

Blankensteijn

Harris

. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):1048–1960.

18.

Antiga

Piccinelli

Botti

Ene-Iordache

Remuzzi

Steinman

. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008;46(11):1097–1112.

19.

Doyle

Crawford

Osman

. Analysis of iliac artery geometric properties in fenestrated aortic stent graft rotation. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;52(3):188–194.

20.

Piccinelli

Veneziani

Steinman

Remuzzi

Antiga

. A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28(8):1141–1155.

21.

Cicchetti

. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284–290.

22.

Hallgren

. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23–34.

23.

Kottner

Audige

Brorson

. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):661–671.

24.

Wyss

Dick

Brown

Greenhalgh

. The influence of thrombus, calcification, angulation, and tortuosity of attachment sites on the time to the first graft-related complication after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(4):965–971.

25.

Sangalli

Secchi

Vantini

Veneziani

. Efficient estimation of three-dimensional curves and their derivatives by free-knot regression splines, applied to the analysis of inner carotid artery centrelines. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2009;58(3):285–306.

26.

Gallo

Vardoulis

Monney

. Cardiovascular morphometry with high-resolution 3D magnetic resonance: first application to left ventricle diastolic dysfunction. Med Eng Phys. 2017;47:64–71.