Characterize factors raised in carotid endarterectomy litigation.
Methods:
Outcomes, alleged causes of malpractice, and other factors were evaluated.
Results:
Of the 37 verdicts and settlements, defendants were not liable in 25 (67.5%) cases. Frequently reported complications included stroke (51.3%) and hypoglossal nerve injury (27.0%), with other complications including airway compromise, vocal cord injury, and death. No cases reported myocardial infarction. Cerebral monitoring was mentioned in 2 cases, while inadequate informed consent, delayed diagnosis, and requirement of additional surgery were alleged in numerous instances. Settlements and jury awards averaged US$895 833 and US$1.53 million, respectively.
Conclusions:
Stroke and hypoglossal nerve injury are the most frequently litigated complications, and mean damages awarded were considerable. Knowledge of issues raised in our analysis may be included in a comprehensive consent process, potentially minimizing liability and improving patient safety.
KilgoreMLMorriseyMANelsonLJ. Tort law and medical malpractice insurance premiums. Inquiry. 2006;43(3):255–270.
2.
FloydTK. Medical malpractice: trends in litigation. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(7):1822–1825, 5e1.
3.
LitvinSG. An overview of medical malpractice litigation and the perceived crisis. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 2005(433):8–14.
4.
BrennerRJSmithJJ. The malpractice liability crisis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1(1):18–22.
5.
HertzBTArthursJ. Malpractice rates plateauing. The only thing to fear may be fear itself. Med Econ. 2011;88(22):24–25, 8–9, 32.
6.
AndersonGFHusseyPSFrognerBKWatersHR. Health spending in the United States and the rest of the industrialized world. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(4):903–914.
7.
Lynn-MacraeAGLynn-MacraeRAEmaniJKernRCConleyDB. Medicolegal analysis of injury during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(8):1492–1495.
8.
2008 Exclusive Survey. Malpractice premiums: dropping, but still high. Med Econ. 2008;85(15):36–38.
9.
Malpractice payouts flat but premiums rise 120%. Manag Care. 2005;14(8):23.
10.
HermerLDBrodyH. Defensive medicine, cost containment, and reform. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(5):470–473.
11.
Medical malpractice litigation raises health-care cost, reduces access, and lowers quality of care. J Med Pract Manage. 2004;20(1):44–51.
12.
SingerMCIversonKCTerrisDJ. Thyroidectomy-related malpractice claims. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(3):358–361.
13.
LydiattDD. Medical malpractice and the thyroid gland. Head Neck. 2003;25(6):429–431.
14.
LydiattDD. Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):50–53.
15.
WaltersALDaceyKTZemlyakAYLincourtAEHenifordBT. Medical malpractice and hernia repair: an analysis of case law. J Surg Res. 2013;180(2):196–200.
16.
LydiattDD. Medical malpractice and cancer of the larynx. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(3):445–448.
17.
VogelTRDombrovskiyVYHaserPBScheirerJCGrahamAM. Outcomes of carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(2):325–330.
18.
HartmannAHuppTKochHC. Prospective study on the complication rate of carotid surgery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9(3):152–156.
19.
BabikianVLCantelmoNL. Cerebrovascular monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1799–1801.
20.
KlukJGraingerSNyamekyeIK. Is the retrojugular approach safer than the conventional approach for carotid endarterectomy?World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1533–1537.
21.
GuayJOchrochEA. Carotid endarterectomy plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone for carotid artery stenosis in symptomatic or asymptomatic patients: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26(5):835–844.
22.
NashJJNashAGLeachMEPoetkerDM. Medical malpractice and corticosteroid use. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(1):10–15.
23.
ReillyBKHornGMSewellRK. Hearing loss resulting in malpractice litigation: what physicians need to know. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):112–117.
24.
KovalerchikOMadyLJSviderPF. Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(9):722–725.
25.
Frank-StromborgMGanschowJR. Legal issues in the early detection and monitoring of cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2002;18(2):128–134.
26.
SviderPFKeeleyBRZumbaOMauroACSetzenMEloyJA. From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(8):1849–1853.
27.
MorrisLGZiffDJDelacureMD. Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(1):102–107.
28.
SviderPFKovalerchikOMauroACBaredesSEloyJA. Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):1156–1162.
29.
SviderPFSunaryoPLKeeleyBRKovalerchikOMauroACEloyJA. Characterizing liability for cranial nerve injuries: a detailed analysis of 209 malpractice trials. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(5):1156–1162.
30.
WegmanBStannardJPBalBS. Medical liability of the physician in training. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 2012;470(5):1379–1385.
31.
MitnickJSVazquezMFKronovetSZRosesDF. Malpractice litigation involving patients with carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(4):315–321.
32.
ChoudhryAJAnandalwarSPChoudhryAJ. Uncovering malpractice in appendectomies: a review of 234 cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(10):1796–1803.
33.
SviderPFBlakeDMHusainQ. In the eyes of the law: malpractice litigation in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(2):119–123.
34.
SviderPFBlakeDMSahniKP. Meningitis and legal liability: an otolaryngology perspective. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014;35(2):198–203.
35.
SviderPFPashkovaAAFolbeAJ. Obstructive sleep apnea: strategies for minimizing liability and enhancing patient safety. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(6):947–953.
36.
SviderPFPashkovaAAVidalGPMauroACEloyJAChokshiRJ. Esophageal perforation and rupture: a comprehensive medicolegal examination of 59 Jury Verdicts and settlements. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(10):1732–1738.
37.
JenaABChandraALakdawallaDSeaburyS. Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(11):892–894.
38.
MoffettPMooreG. The standard of care: legal history and definitions: the bad and good news. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(1):109–112.
39.
PennekampCWMollFLde BorstGJ. The potential benefits and the role of cerebral monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(6):693–697.
40.
MichaelidesCNguyenTNChiappaKHKwolekCJSimonMV. Cerebral embolism during elective carotid endarterectomy treated with tissue plasminogen activator: utility of intraoperative EEG monitoring. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112(5):446–449.
41.
GahremanpourAPerinECSilvaG. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review. Tex Heart Instit J. 2012;39(4):474–487.
