Centralization Harnessing Volume-Outcome Relationships in Vascular Surgery and Aortic Aneurysm Care Should Not Focus Solely on Threshold Operative Caseload
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2010
Centralization Harnessing Volume-Outcome Relationships in Vascular Surgery and Aortic Aneurysm Care Should Not Focus Solely on Threshold Operative Caseload
There has been great interest in the setting of threshold operative volumes for safety to guide centralisation of vascular surgical services by healthcare commissioners. This editorial examines the evidence for designing services around a numeric safety threshold in the relationship between volume and outcome in vascular surgery. Thresholds should be aimed at the best outcomes and equity of care. Equity means access to the most up-to-date technology and all the relevant support services for elective and emergency cases. The relationship of volume and outcome with quality is complex, and demands a shift in focus to infrastructural and procedural improvements that drive high-quality services rather than the concentration of planning exclusively around an operative volume threshold.
Karthikesalingam A., Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, Holt PJE.Volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery: the current status . 2010 (In Press).
2.
Young EL, Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Loftus IM, Thompson MMMeta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between surgeon annual caseload and mortality for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs . J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(6):1287-1294.
3.
Birkmeyer JD , Dimick JBPotential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery . 2004;135(6):569-575.
4.
Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Loftus IM, Michaels JA, Thompson MMEpidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005. Br J Surg. 2007;94(4):441-448.
5.
Troeng T.Volume versus outcome when treating abdominal aortic aneurysm electively-is there evidence to centralise?Scand J Surg.2008;97(2):154-159; discussion 59-60.
6.
Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M., et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. New Eng J Med. 2005;352(23):2398-405.
7.
Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Khalid U., Hinchliffe R., Loftus IM, Thompson MMEffect of endovascular aneurysm repair on the volume outcome relationship in aneurysm repair. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes.2009;2(6):624-632.
8.
EVAR Trial Participants.Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2005; 365(9478):2179-2186.
9.
Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA.2009;302(14):1535-1542.
10.
Amundsen S. , Skjaerven R., Trippestad A., Soreide O.Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Is there an association between surgical volume, surgical experience, hospital type and operative mortality? Members of the Norwegian Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Trial. Acta Chir Scand. 1990;156(4):323-327; discussion 27-28.
11.
Hannan EL, Kilburn H. Jr, O’Donnell JF, et al. A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between in-hospital mortality in New York State and the volume of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgeries performed. Health Serv Res.1992;27(4):517-542.
12.
Katz DJ, Stanley JC, Zelenock GBOperative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Michigan: an eleven-year statewide experience. J Vasc Surg . 1994;19(5): 804-815; discussion 16-17.
13.
Wen SW, Simunovic M., Williams JI, Johnston KW, Naylor CDHospital volume, calendar age, and short term outcomes in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the Ontario experience, 1988-92 . J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50(2):207-213.
14.
Manheim LM, Sohn MW, Feinglass J., Ujiki M., Parker MA, Pearce WHHospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality rates in California, 1982-1994. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 28(1):45-56; discussion 56-58.
15.
Dardik A., Lin JW, Gordon TA, Williams GM, Perler BAResults of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the 1990s: A population-based analysis of 2335 cases. J Vasc Surg.1999; 30(6):985-995.
16.
Dimick JB, Stanley JC, Axelrod DA, et al. Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: impact of hospital volume, gender, and age. Ann Surg. 2002; 235(4):579-585.
17.
Dueck AD, Kucey DS, Johnston KW, Alter D., Laupacis A.Long-term survival and temporal trends in patient and surgeon factors after elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(6):1261-1267.
18.
Birkmeyer JD , Dimick JB, Staiger DOOperative mortality and procedure volume as predictors of subsequent hospital performance. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):411-417.
19.
Jibawi A., Hanafy M., Guy A.Is there a minimum caseload that achieves acceptable operative mortality in abdominal aortic aneurysm operations? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32(3):273-276.
20.
Dimick JB, Upchurch GR Jr.Endovascular technology, hospital volume, and mortality with abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg.2008 ;47(6):1150-1154.
21.
Egorova N., Giacovelli JK, Gelijns A., et al. Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair . J Vasc Surg.2009; 50(6):1271-1279 e1.
22.
Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Pomposelli FB, Wyers MC, Dahlberg SE, Schermerhorn MLPopulation-based outcomes following endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther.2009;16(5):554-564.
23.
Egorova N., Giacovelli J., Greco G., Gelijns A., Kent CK, McKinsey JFNational outcomes for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison of open versus endovascular repairs. J Vasc Surg . 2008;48(5):1092-1100; 1100e1-2.
24.
Holt PJ, Karthikesalingam A., Hinchliffe R., Poloniecki JD, Loftus IM, Thompson BGRuptured aneurysms in England: a propensity scored analysis of outcomes . Br J Surg.2010;97(4): 496-503.
Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MMModel for the reconfiguration of specialized vascular services. Br J Surg. 2008;95(12):1469-1474.
27.
Michaels J. , Brazier J., Palfreyman S., Shackley P., Slack R.Cost and outcome implications of the organisation of vascular services. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(11):i-iv; 1-191.
28.
Donabedian A.An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
29.
Hamilton G. , Shearman C.Vascular surgical training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(2):95-96.
30.
Khuri SFInvited commentary: surgeons, not General Motors, should set standards for surgical care. Surgery. 2001;130(3): 429-431.
