Importance of Validation of Accuracy of Duplex Ultrasonography in Identifying Moderate and Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The accuracy of carotid duplex ultrasonography (CDU) in detecting moderate and severe carotid artery disease was evaluated in comparison with arteriography. Methods: Accuracy of CDU was correlated with arteriographic findings using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria in 147 internal carotid arteries. The duplex measurements consisted of peak systolic velocities (PSVs), end diastolic velocities (EDVs), and internal carotid PSV to common carotid artery PSV ratios (ICA/CCA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy (OA) using the 3 parameters were determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed from the ultrasonographic data for detection of 50% or greater stenosis (moderate disease) and 70% or greater stenosis (severe disease). Results: CDU for detecting ≥50% stenosis had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 87.8%, and accuracy of 96.6%. The area under the ROC curves for PSV was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.93), for EDV was 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92), and for ICA:CCA ratio was 0.95 (CI 0.91-0.99). CDU for detecting ≥70% stenosis had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 87.1%, and accuracy of 94.5%. The area under the ROC curves for PSV was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.84), for EDV was 0.74 (95% CI of 0.65-0.82), and for ICA/CCA ratio was 0.89 (0.84-0.94). Conclusions: We conclude that ≥50% stenosis and ≥70% stenosis can be reliably determined by CDU in our vascular laboratory. Each vascular laboratory must validate their own criteria against the current gold standard of carotid arteriography. A high degree of confidence in CDU is critical before any institution uses the test as the sole diagnostic method prior to carotid intervention.

Keywords

duplex ultrasonography carotid stenosis carotid arteriography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jahromi AS , Cina CS , Liu Y. , Clase CM Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis . J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(6):962-972.

Faught WE , Mattos MA , van Bemmelen PS , et al. Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: new velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19(5):818-827.

Nicholas GG , Osborne MA , Jaffe JW , Reed JF 3rd. Carotid artery stenosis: preoperative noninvasive evaluation in a community hospital. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22(1):9-16.

Back MR , Wilson JS , Rushing MS , et al. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy . J Vasc Surg. 2000;32(3):429-440.

Mattle HP , Kent KC , Edelman RR , Atkinson DJ , Skillman JJ Evaluation of the extracranial carotid arteries: correlation of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and conventional angiography. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13(6):838-844.

Mattos MA , Hodgson KJ , Faught WE , Mansour A. , Barkmeir LD , Ramseu DE , et al. Carotid endarterectomy without angiography: is color-flow duplex scanning sufficient? Surgery. 1994;116(4): 776-782.

Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (NASCET) . New Engl J Med. 1991;325(7):445-453.

Kaufmann TJ , Huston J. 3rd , Mandrekar JN , Schleck CD , Thielen KR , Kallmes DF Complications of diagnostic cerebral Angiography: evaluation of 19 826 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243(3):812-819.

Howard G. , Chambless LE , Baker WH , et al. A multicenter validation study of Doppler ultrasound versus angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1991 ;1(4):166-173.

10.

Byrd S. , Robless P. , Baxter A. , Emson M. , Halliday A. Carotid duplex ustrasonography: importance of standardization. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborators and Vascular Laboratories. Int Angiol. 1998;17(4):248-254.

11.

Kuntz KM , Polak JF , Whittemore AD , Skillman JJ , Kent KC Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific. Stroke. 1997;28(3):597-602.

12.

Grant EG , Benson CB , Moneta GL , et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray scale and Doppler US diagnosis-Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology . 2003;229(2): 340-346.

13.

Fillinger MF , Baker RJ , Zwolak RM , et al. Carotid duplex criteria for a 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: variation according to equipment. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24(5):856-864.

14.

Howard G. , Baker WH , Chambless LE , Howard VJ , Jones AM , Toole JF An approach for the use of Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool for hemodynamically significant stenosis (despite heterogeneity of Doppler performance). A multicenter experience. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Investigators. Stroke. 1996;27(11):1951-1957.

15.

Smith LL , Anderson DS , Gramith F. A step-by-step guide for validation of carotid duplex studies. JVT. 1993;17(1):17-22.

16.

Carroll BA Carotid sonography. Radiology. 1991;178(2): 303-313.

17.

Hayes AC , Johnston KW , Baker WH , et al. The effect of contralateral disease on carotid Dopple frequency . Surgery. 1988;103(1): 19-23.

18.

Eliasziw M. , Rankin RN , Fox AJ , Haynes RB , Barnett HJ Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke. 1995; 26(10):1747-1752.

19.

Strandness DE , Jr. Extracranial arterial disease. In: Strandness DE Jr , ed. Duplex Scanning in Vascular Disorders. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993:113-157.

20.

Moneta GL , Edwards JM , Papaicolau G. , et al. Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(6): 989-994.

21.

Clase CM , Cina CS Medical management versus investigate and operate strategy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a decision analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(3):541-548.

22.

Chikos PM , Fisher LD , Hirsch JH , Harley JD , Thiele BL , Starndenss DE Observer variability in evaluating extracranial carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 1983;14(6):885-892.