Objective: To assess the accuracy of ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) assessed by photoplethysmography (PPG) compared with continuous wave Doppler (CW-Doppler). Methods: Ankle brachial pressure index was measured in a standard manner using both PPG and Doppler probes. For PPG-ABPI, a PPG probe was placed on the index finger and great toe, and a microcomputer determined the ABPI. These values were compared with the ABPI measured manually using an 8-MHz Doppler probe. Correlation and agreement between PPG and Doppler ABPI were assessed by Lin’s correlation coefficient and Bland—Altman plots. Results: In all, 133 claudicants were assessed. There was a strong correlation between the 2 ABPI methods (β = .79 and 95% limits of agreement of —0.23 to 0.24). Conclusion: Measuring ABPI automatically using the PPG technique is an effective alternative for Doppler ABPI. PPG-ABPI is completely objective, fast, and accurate.
Belch JJ, Topol EJ, Agnelli G., et al. Prevention of Atherothrombotic Disease Network. Critical issues in peripheral arterial disease detection and management: a call to action . Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(8):884-892.
2.
Weitz JI, Byrne J., Clagett GP, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic arterial insufficiency of the lower extremities: a critical review. Circulation. 1996;94(11): 3026-3049.
3.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Clopidogrel and Modified Release Dipyridamole in the Prevention of Occlusive Vascular Events. Technical Appraisal 90. London: NICE; 2005.
4.
Amputee Statistical Database for the United Kingdom: 2004/05 Report, Information Services Division NHS Scotland. http://www.nasdab.co.uk/publications.asp. Accessed December 04, 2008.
Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D., et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286(11):1317-1324.
7.
Pearson TANew tools for coronary risk assessment: what are their advantages and limitations?Circulation. 2002;105(7):886-892; review.
8.
Ogren M., Hedblad B., Jungquist G., Isacsson SO, Lindell SE, Janzon L.Low ankle-brachial pressure index in 68-year-old men: prevalence, risk factors and prognosis. Results from prospective population study ‘‘Men born in 1914’’, Malmö, Sweden. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993; 7(5):500-506.
9.
Agnelli G., Cimminiello C., Meneghetti G., Urbinati S.for the Polyvascular Atherothrombosis Observational Survey (PATHOS) Investigators.Low ankle-brachial index predicts an adverse 1-year outcome after acute coronary and cerebrovascular events. J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4(12):2599-2606.
10.
Wild SH, Byrne CD, Smith FB, Lee AJ, Fowkes FGLow ankle-brachial pressure index predicts increased risk of cardiovascular disease independent of the metabolic syndrome and conventional cardiovascular risk factors in the Edinburgh Artery Study. Diabetes Care . 2006; 29(3):637-642.
11.
Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Butcher I., et al, the Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration.Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008; 300(2):197-208.
12.
Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D., et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286(11):1317-1324.
13.
McDermott MMThe magnitude of the problem of peripheral arterial disease: epidemiology and clinical significance. Cleve Clin J Med. 2006;73(suppl 4):S2-S7.
14.
Kaiser V., Kester AD, Stoffers HE, Kitslaar PJ, Knottnerus JAThe influence of experience on the reproducibility of the ankle-brachial systolic pressure ratio in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;18(1):25-29.
15.
Chua CP, Heneghan C.Continuous blood pressure monitoring using ECG and finger photoplethysmogram . Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:5117-5120.
16.
Selvaraj N. , Jaryal A., Santhosh J., Deepak KK, Anand S.Assessment of heart rate variability derived from finger-tip photoplethysmography as compared to electrocardiography. J Med Eng Technol. 2008;32(6):479-484.
17.
Knorr BR, McGrath SP, Blike GTUsing a generalized neural network to identify airway obstructions in anesthetized patients postoperatively based on photoplethysmography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006:suppl):6765-6768.
18.
Bland JM, Altman DGStatistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310.
19.
Efron B., Tibshirani RJAn Introduction to the Bootstrap (Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability) . London: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
20.
Lin LIA concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate eproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255-268.
21.
Jönsson B., Laurent C., Eneling M., Skau T., Lindberg LGAutomatic ankle pressure measurements using PPG in ankle-brachial pressure index determination. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(4):395-401.
22.
Hobbs JT, Yao ST, Lewis JD, Needham TNA limitation of the Doppler ultrasound method of measuring ankle systolic pressure. Vasa. 1974;3(2):160-162.
23.
Shafer R., Shafer N., Positano RGThe early diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987;4(3):729-742.
24.
Guerrero A. , Montes R., Muñoz-Terol J., et al. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with stages IV and V chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(12): 3525-3531.
