Intraoperative Endoleak During EVAR: Frequency,Nature,and Significance

Abstract

Objective: Endoleaks are critical complications of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study sought to determine the frequency and nature of intraoperative endoleaks and their impact on postoperative endoleak-related events. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent EVAR at our institution. The impact of intraoperative endoleaks on postoperative endoleak rates and endoleak-related reintervention rates were assessed. Results: From December 18, 1996, to May 21, 2003, 241 patients underwent EVAR. An endoleak was observed during 126 (52.3%) procedures. Type I endoleaks were observed in 63 (26.1%) cases: 35 proximal and 31 distal endoleaks (3 cases at both attachments). Angioplasty, additional cuff placement, or stenting corrected 59 (89.4%) of these endoleaks. A total of 71 type II intraoperative endoleaks (29.5%) and 8 type IV endoleaks (3.3%) were observed without any attempted corrective maneuvers. Ten type III endoleaks (4.2%) occurred but all resolved with angioplasty or additional cuff placement. In all, 86 (35.7%) endoleaks persisted on completion angiogram. Patients with a type I or type II intraoperative endoleak were more likely to have an endoleak at 1.5 years (31.4% vs. 21.6%, P = .018). Reinterventions were required more often after an intraoperative type I endoleak (10% vs. 4%, P = .003). Patients with intraoperative endoleaks demonstrated a trend toward less postoperative aneurysm diameter reduction at 2 years (43.8% vs. 74.5%, P = .104). Conclusion: The presence of a type I or a type II endoleak during EVAR significantly increases the likelihood of a postoperative endoleak and should prompt a high degree of suspicion during follow-up.

Keywords

intraoperative endoleak EVAR reinterventions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Parodi JC , Palmaz JC , Barone HD Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms . Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491-499.

Matsumura JS , Moore WS Clinical consequences of periprosthetic leak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Endovascular Technologies Investigators. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:606-613.

Wain RA , Marin ML , Ohki T. , et al. Endoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27: 69-78; discussion 78-80.

van Marrewijk C. , Buth J. , Harris PL , Norgren L. , Nevelsteen A. , Wyatt MG Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:461-473.

White RA , Donayre C. , Walot I. , Stewart M. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture following endoluminal graft deployment: report of a predictable event. J Endovasc Ther. 2000;7:257-262.

Back MR , Bowser AN , Johnson BL , Schmacht D. , Zwiebel B. , Bandyk DF Patency of infrarenal aortic side branches determines early aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17:27-34.

Matsumura JS, Pearce WH, McCarthy WJ, Yao JS. Reduction in aortic aneurysm size: early results after endovascular graft placement. EVT Investigators. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:113-123.

Mohan IV , Laheij RJ , Harris PL Risk factors for endoleak and the evidence for stent-graft oversizing in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21:344-349.

Walker SR , Halliday K. , Yusuf SW , et al. A study on the patency of the inferior mesenteric and lumbar arteries in the incidence of endoleak following endovascular repair of infra-renal aortic aneurysms. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:593-595.

10.

Arko FR , Rubin GD , Johnson BL , Hill BB , Fogarty TJ , Zarins CK Type-II endoleaks following endovascular AAA repair: preoperative predictors and long-term effects. J Endovasc Ther. 2001 ;8:503-510.

11.

Sampaio SM , Panneton JM , Mozes GI , et al. Aneurysm sac thrombus load predicts type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19: 302-309.

12.

Sampaio SM , Panneton JM , Mozes GI , et al. Proximal type I endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: predictive factors. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:621-628.

13.

Chaikof EL , Blankensteijn JD , Harris PL , et al. the Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048-1060.

14.

Panneton JM Entrapment of the limb of an endovascular graft: a peril of saccular aneurysms. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2002;15:187-189.

15.

Zarins CK , White RA , Hodgson KJ , et al. Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:90-107.

16.

Armon MP , Yusuf SW , Whitaker SC , et al. Thrombus distribution and changes in aneurysm size following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 1998;16:472-476.

17.

Petrik PV , Moore WS Endoleaks following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the predictive value of preoperative anatomic factors-a review of 100 cases. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:739-744.

18.

Gorich J. , Rilinger N. , Sokiranski R. , et al. Endoleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: are they predictable?-initial results. Radiology. 2001;218: 477-480.

19.

Rhee RY , Eskandari MK , Zajko AB , Makaroun MS Long-term fate of the aneurysmal sac after endoluminal exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:689-696.

20.

White GH , May J. , Waugh RC , Chaufour X. , Yu W. Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1998;5:305-309.

21.

Wolf YG , Tillich M. , Lee WA , Fogarty TJ , Zarins CK , Rubin GD Changes in aneurysm volume after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm . J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:305-309.