The development of multidetector computed tomography represents a remarkable diagnostic advancement because this imaging modality has been widely used in the evaluation of the cardiovascular system. With scanner-adjusted image acquisition and contrast medium administration, multidetector computed tomographic angiography provides a cost-effective and accurate imaging assessment in patients with aortic pathologies or peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography is associated with several advantages, including high image spatial resolution and rapid imaging acquisition speed. This diagnostic methodology allows accurate detection of a variety of intravascular lesions in the carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, renal arteries, and peripheral arterial systems. This article provides an overview of multidetector computed tomographic angiography in the assessment of arterial disease and reviews current literature about this diagnostic technology in the evaluation of aortic and peripheral arterial pathologies.
Willmann JK, Baumert B., Schertler T., et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography . Radiology. 2005;236:1083-1093.
8.
Willmann JK, Mayer D., Banyai M., et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography . Radiology. 2003;229:465-474.
9.
Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, Kee ST, Logan LJ, Sofilos MCAorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography . Radiology. 2000;215:670-676.
10.
Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B., et al. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography . AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180: 1085-1091.
11.
Ofer A., Nitecki SS, Linn S., et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography . AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:719-724.
12.
Willmann JK, Wildermuth S. Multidetector-row CT angiography of upper- and lower-extremity peripheral arteries. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(suppl 4):D3-D9.
13.
Willmann JK, Wildermuth S., Pfammatter T., et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2003;226:798-811.
14.
Ota H., Takase K., Igarashi K., et al. MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:201-209.
Fleischmann D., Rubin GDQuantification of intravenously administered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography. Radiology. 2005;236:1076-1082.
17.
Catalano C. , Fraioli F., Laghi A., et al. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography . Radiology. 2004;231:555-563.
18.
Laswed T., Rizzo E., Guntern D., et al. Assessment of occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries: value of multidetector CT angiography using an adaptive acquisition method. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:263-272.
19.
Rofsky NM, Adelman MAMR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease . Radiology. 2000;214:325-338.
20.
Wintersperger B., Jakobs T., Herzog P., et al. Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:334-341.
21.
Schertler T. , Wildermuth S., Alkadhi H., Kruppa M., Marincek B., Boehm T.Sixteen-detector row CT angiography for lower-leg arterial occlusive disease: analysis of section width. Radiology . 2005;237:649-656.
Ouwendijk R. , de Vries M., Pattynama PM, et al. Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology . 2005; 236:1094-1103.
24.
Ouwendijk R. , Kock MC, Visser K., Pattynama PM, de Haan MW, Hunink MGInterobserver agreement for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in peripheral arterial disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 ;185:1261-1267.
25.
Visser K., Hunink MGPeripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US-a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2000 ; 216:67-77.
26.
Koelemay MJ , Lijmer JG, Stoker J., Legemate DA, Bossuyt PMMagnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis . JAMA . 2001;285:1338-1345.
27.
Krakauer JWThe complex dynamics of stroke onset and progression . Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:47-50.
28.
Meschia JF, Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd.Diagnosis and invasive management of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis . Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:851-858.
29.
Lin PH, Barshes NR, Annambhotla S., Huynh TTProspective randomized trials of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: an appraisal of the current literature. Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2008;42:5-11.
30.
Naylor ARIs surgery still generally the first choice intervention in patients with carotid artery disease? Surgeon. 2008 ;6:6-12.
31.
Willinsky RA , Taylor SM, TerBrugge K., Farb RI, Tomlinson G., Montanera W.Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology. 2003;227:522-528.
32.
Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S., Soinne L., Railo M., Valanne L.CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol . 2007;28:97-103.
33.
de Weert TT , Ouhlous M., Meijering E., et al. In vivo characterization and quantification of atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2366-2372.
34.
Wintermark M., Fischbein NJ, Smith WS, Ko NU, Quist M., Dillon WPAccuracy of dynamic perfusion CT with deconvolution in detecting acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol . 2005;26:104-112.
35.
Hecht HS, Budoff MJ, Berman DS, Ehrlich J., Rumberger JACoronary artery calcium scanning: Clinical paradigms for cardiac risk assessment and treatment. Am Heart J. 2006 ;151:1139-1146.
36.
Maruyama T. , Yoshizumi T., Tamura R., et al. Comparison of eight- versus 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography for visibility and image quality of coronary segments. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1539-1543.
37.
Maruyama T. , Yoshizumi T., Tamura R., et al. Comparison of visibility and diagnostic capability of noninvasive coronary angiography by eight-slice multidetector-row computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:537-542.
38.
Shaw LJ, Raggi P., Berman DS, Callister TQCoronary artery calcium as a measure of biologic age. Atherosclerosis . 2006;188:112-119.
39.
Shaw LJ, Raggi P., Callister TQ, Berman DSPrognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in asymptomatic smokers and non-smokers. Eur Heart J. 2006 ; 27: 968-975.
40.
McKinney AM, Casey SO, Teksam M., et al. Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography. Neuroradiology . 2005;47:1-9.
41.
Chen CJ, Lee TH, Hsu HL, et al. Multi-Slice CT angiography in diagnosing total versus near occlusions of the internal carotid artery: comparison with catheter angiography. Stroke. 2004;35:83-85.
42.
Lev MH, Romero JM, Goodman DN, et al. Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1123-1119.
43.
Harris PL, Buth J.An update on the important findings from the EUROSTAR EVAR registry. Vascular. 2004; 12:33-38.
44.
Gotway MB, Dawn SKThoracic aorta imaging with multisclice CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:521-543.
45.
Armerding MD , Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, et al. Aortic aneurysmal disease: assessment of stent-graft treatment-CT versus conventional angiography . Radiology. 2000;215:138-146.
46.
Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000 ;283:897-903.
47.
Ledbetter S. , Stuk JL, Kaufman JAHelical (spiral) CT in the evaluation of emergent thoracic aortic syndromes. Traumatic aortic rupture, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer . Radiol Clin North Am.1999;37:575-589.
48.
Sebastia C. , Pallisa E., Quiroga S., Alvarez-Castells A., Dominguez R., Evangelista A.Aortic dissection: diagnosis and follow-up with helical CT. Radiographics. 1999;19:45-60; quiz 149-150.
Iezzi R., Cotroneo AR, Filippone A., Di Fabio F., Santoro M., Storto MLMDCT angiography in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: diagnostic impact of slice thickness on detection of endoleaks. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1414-1420.
51.
Ishida M., Kato N., Hirano T., Shimono T., Shimpo H., Takeda K.Thoracic CT findings following endovascular stent-graft treatment for thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:333-341.
52.
Laugharne M. , Haslam E., Archer L., et al. Multidetector CT angiography in live donor renal transplantation: experience from 156 consecutive cases at a single centre. Transpl Int. 2007 ;20:156-166.
53.
Muhs BE, Vincken KL, Teutelink A., et al. Dynamic cine-computed tomography angiography imaging of standard and fenestrated endografts: differing effects on renal artery motion. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008; 42:25-31.
54.
Rountas C., Vlychou M., Vassiou K., et al. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography . Ren Fail. 2007;29:295-302.
55.
Kim T., Murakami T., Takahashi S., et al. Evaluation of renal arteries in living renal donors: comparison between MDCT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Radiat Med. 2006;24:617-624.
56.
Raman SS, Pojchamarnwiputh S., Muangsomboon K., Schulam PG, Gritsch HA, Lu DSUtility of 16-MDCT angiography for comprehensive preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2006;186:1630-1638.
57.
Schlunt LB, Harper JD, Broome DR, et al. Improved detection of renal vascular anatomy using multidetector CT angiography: is 100% detection possible? J Endourol. 2007;21:12-17.
58.
Mesurolle B. , Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M., Goeau-Brissonniere OA, Mignon F., Lacombe P.Occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities: comparison of helical CT angiography with transcatheter angiography. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:252-260.
59.
Mishra A., Bhaktarahalli JN, Ehtuish EFImaging of peripheral arteries by 16-row multidetector computed tomography angiography: a feasible tool? Eur J Radiol. 2007;61:528-533.
60.
Romano M., Mainenti PP, Imbriaco M., et al. Multidetector row CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Eur J Radiol . 2004;50:303-308.
61.
Bogdan MA, Klein MB, Rubin GD, McAdams TR, Chang J.CT angiography in complex upper extremity reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004;29:465-469.
62.
Klein MB, Karanas YL, Chow LC, Rubin GD, Chang J.Early experience with computed tomographic angiography in microsurgical reconstruction . Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 ;112:498-503.
63.
Schernthaner R., Fleischmann D., Lomoschitz F., Stadler A., Lammer J., Loewe C.Effect of MDCT angiographic findings on the management of intermittent claudication. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2007;189:1215-1222.
64.
Fleischmann D., Rubin GD, Bankier AA, Hittmair K.Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology. 2000;214:363-371.
65.
Dorenbeck U. , Seitz J., Volk M., et al. Evaluation of arterial bypass grafts of the pelvic and lower extremities with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:60-64.
66.
Loewe C., Cejna M., Schoder M., et al. Contrast material-enhanced, moving-table MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14: 1129-1137.
