The evolution of minimally invasive endovascular technology has initiated a significant paradigm shift in the treatment of vascular disease. A fundamental understanding of the science and engineering behind the technology of endovascular stents is a key to their appropriate implementation in practice. Furthermore, the rapid influx of new devices into the field requires practitioners to make their decisions on a foundation of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the various products. Although the principles of their use are not complex, the device design can have a profound effect on the device's functionality. Shape, thickness, coating, material selection, and imaging are just a few of the factors to consider in stent design. Subtle differences may have profound results. This review is designed to provide the reader with an overview of fundamental concepts that will aide the assessment of new technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Sidawy A, Sumpio B, Depalma R: In: The Basic Science of Vascular Diseases. New Haven: Futura Publishing Company, 1997, p 576-576.
2.
Kinney T, Hin A, Rurik G, et al: Transluminal angioplasty: A mechanical pathophysiological correlation of its physical mechanisms. Radiology153:85-89, 1984.
3.
Gotman I: Characteristics of metals used in implants. J Endourol11:383-389, 1997.
4.
Heintz C, Riepe G, Birken L, et al: Corroded nitinol wires in explanted aortic endografts: An important mechanism of failure?J Endovasc Ther8:248-253, 2001.
5.
Shih CC LS, Chung KH, Chen YL, et al: Increased corrosion resistance of stent materials by converting current surface film of polycrystalline oxide into amorphous oxide. J Biomed Marterials Res52:323-332, 2000.
6.
O’Brien B, Carroll W, Kelly M: Passivation of nitinol wire for vascular implants—a demonstration of the benefits. Biomaterials23:1739-1748, 2002.
7.
Klein CL, Nieder P, Wagner M, et al: The role of metal corrosion in inflammatory processes: Induction of adhesion molecules by heavy metal ions. Pathophysiol5:798-807, 1994.
8.
Balasubramanian V, Hall C, Shivashankar S, et al: Vascular cell attachment and procoagulant activity on metal alloys. J Biomaterials Sci, Polymer Edition9:1349-1359, 1998.
9.
Tanigawa N, Sawada S, Kobayashi M: Reaction of the aortic wall to six metallic stent materials. Acad Radiol2:379-384, 1995.
10.
Gutensohn K, Beythien C, Bau J, et al: In vitro analyses of diamond-like carbon coated stents. Reduction of metal ion release, platelet activation, and thrombogenicity. Thromb Res99:577-585, 2000.
11.
Cloft H, Kallmes D, Lin H, et al: Bovine type I collagen as an endovascular stent-graft material: Biocompatibility study in rabbits. Radiology214:557-562, 2000.
12.
Morice MC SP, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, et al: A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med346:1773-1780, 2002.
13.
Park SJ SW, Ho DS, Raizner AE, et al: A Paclitaxeleluting stent for the prevention of coronary restenosis. N Engl J Med348:1537-1545, 2003.
14.
Duda SH BM, Lammer J, Scheinart D, et al: Sirolimus-eluting versus bare nitinol stent for obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: The SIROCCO II trial. J Vasc Intervent Radiol16:331-338, 2005.
15.
Avino A, Johnson B, Bandyk D, et al: Does prosthetic covering of nitinol stents alter healing characteristics or hemodynamics?J Endovasc Ther7:469-478, 2000.
16.
Cejna M, Virmani R, Jones R, et al: Biocompatibility and performance of the Wallstent and the Wallgraft, Jostent, and Hemobahn stent-grafts in a sheep model. J Vasc Intervent Radiol13:823-830, 2002.
17.
Keuren JF, Wielders SJ, Driessen A, et al: Covalently-bound heparin makes collagen thromboresistant. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol24:613-617, 2004.
18.
Lev EI, Assali AR, Teplisky I, et al: Comparison of outcomes up to six months of heparin-coated with noncoated stents after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol93:741-743, 2004.
19.
Madduri J, Assali A, Solodky A, et al: Acute and intermediate-term clinical outcomes following heparincoated BX coronary stent implantation in patients with thrombus-containing lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent6:77-81, 2004.
20.
van der Bas JM, Quax PH, van den Berg AC, et al: Ingrowth of aorta wall into stent grafts impregnated with basic fibroblast growth factor: A porcine in vivo study of blood vessel prosthesis healing. J Vasc Surg39:850-858, 2004.
21.
Heublein B, Rohde R, Kaese V, et al: Biocorrosion of magnesium alloys: A new principle in cardiovascular implant technology?Heart89:651-656, 2003.
22.
Tamai H, Igaki K, Kyo E, et al: Initial and 6-month results of biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stents in humans. Circulation102:399-404, 2000.
23.
Hietala EM, Maasilta P, Juuti H, et al: Platelet deposition on stainless steel, spiral, and braided polylactide stents. A comparative study. Thromb Haemost92:1394-1401, 2004.
24.
Di Mario C, Griffiths H, Goktekin O, et al: Drug-eluting bioabsorbable magnesium stent. J Intervent Cardiol17:391-395, 2004.
25.
Moore JJ, Berry J: Fluid and solid mechanical implications of vascular stenting. Ann Biomed Eng30:498-508, 2002.
26.
LaDisa JF Jr, Olson LE, Guler I, et al: Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery. J Appl Physiol97:424-430, 2004.
27.
Pelton A, DiCello J, Miyazaki S: Optimisation of processing and properties of medical grade nitinol wire. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol9:107-118, 2000.
28.
Pelton A, Stockel D, Duerig T: Medical uses of nitinol. Materials Sci Forum327-328:63-70, 2000.
29.
Hodgson D: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies. In: International Organization on SMST-2001, ed. by Russell S, Pelton A.Pacific Grove, CA: SMST Publishers, 2001.
30.
Duerig T, Melton K, Stockel D, et al: Using shape memory for proportional control. In: Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd, 1990, pp 302-366.
31.
Dyet J, Watts W, Ettles D, et al: Mechanical properties of metallic stents: How do these properties influence the choice of stent for specific lesions?Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol23:47-54, 2000.
32.
Duda S, Wiskirchen J, Tepe G, et al: Physical properties of endovascular stents: An experimental comparison. Vasc Intervent Radiol23:47-54, 2000.
33.
Van Dijk L, Van Holten J, Van Dijk B, et al: A precious metal alloy for construction of MR imaging-compatible balloon-expandable vascular stents. Radiology219:284-287, 2001.
34.
Holton A, Walsh E, Anayiotos A, et al: Comparative MRI compatibility of 316L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance4:423-430, 2002.
