Noninvasive Measurement of Shear Rate in Autologous and Prosthetic Bypass Grafts

Abstract

There is a major difference in thrombogenicity between lower extremity prosthetic and autologous vein bypass grafts, and arterial blood flow shear rate is known to influence thrombus formation. Despite this association, there has been little direct clinical observation of shear rates in bypass grafts. The authors developed a new noninvasive method to quantitate human arterial shear rate and used it in a pilot study to characterize differences in lower extremity bypasses. Shear rates were measured in 10 prosthetic and 14 autologous vein femoropopliteal bypass grafts. With CVI-M-mode color flow ultrasonography in resting supine patients, a velocity profile was recorded from a midgraft longitudinal section in the ultrasound beam direction. Shear rates were calculated by using a mathematical-graphic computer program at the anteromedial (near) and posterolateral (far) graft walls by averaging values immediately before and after peak systolic velocity (PSV). Comparison between prosthetic and autologous graft groups respectively revealed that differences in age (67 ± [S] vs 71 ± 10 yr), male gender (60% vs 43%), prevalence of hypertension (50% vs 71%), diabetes (40% vs 64%), smoking (50% vs 50%), hypercholesterolemia (30% vs 29%), coronary artery disease (60% vs 50%), and critical ischemia (60% vs 86%) did not reach statistical significance (p>0.19). Median PSVs were significantly less in prosthetic than in autologous vein bypasses (37 ± 13 vs 57 ±22 cm/s, p = 0.018). Prosthetic and autologous graft diameters were not statistically significantly different (6.3 ± 1.1 vs 5.6 ± 1.3 mm, p = 0. 18). Shear rates were significantly less in prosthetic than in autologous vein bypasses both at the near wall (382± 146 vs 698 +271 s-1, p=0.003) and at the far wall (551 ±235 vs 827 ±339 s^-1, p=0.037). This mathematical model can be used to calculate shear rate from observed ultrasound flow patterns. Prosthetic bypass grafts had lower shear rates than autologous vein grafts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. DeWeese JA : Autogenous venous bypass grafts -still the standard. Cardiovasc Surg 2:180-186, 1994.

2. Quinones-Baldrich WJ , Martin-Paredero V , Baker JD , et al: Polytetrafluoroethylene grafts as the firstchoice arterial substitute in femoropopliteal revascularization. Arch Surg 119:1238-1243, 1984.

3. Ernst CB , Stanley JC : Current Therapy in Vascular Surgery, 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2001, pp 459-479.

4. Veith FJ , Gupta SK , Ascer E , et al: Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 3:104-114, 1986.

5. Goldman M , Norcott HC , Hawker RJ , et al: Femoropopliteal bypass grafts -an isotope technique allowing in vivo comparison of thrombogenicity. Br J Surg 69:380-382, 1982.

6. Kohler TR , Kirkman TR , Kraiss LW , et al: Increased blood flow inhibits neointimal hyperplasia in endothelialized vascular grafts. Circ Res 69:1557-1565, 1991.

7. Grabowski EF : Thrombolysis, flow, and vessel wall interactions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:25S-29S, 1995.

8. Cho JS , Ouriel K , DeWeese JA , et al: Thrombus formation on polytetrafluoroethylene surfaces: The importance of von Willebrand factor. Cardiovasc Surg 3:645-651, 1995.

9. Towne JB , Quinn K , Salles-Cunha S , et al: Effect of increased arterial blood flow on localization and progression of atherosclerosis. Arch Surg 117:1469-1474, 1982.

10.

10. Giddens DP , Zarins CK , Glagov S : The role of fluid mechanics in the localization and detection of atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng 115:588-594, 1993.

11.

11. Hoeks AP , Samijo SK , Brands PJ , et al: Noninvasive determination of shear-rate distribution across the arterial lumen. Hypertension 26:26-33, 1995.

12.

12. Lei M , Archie JP , Kleinstreuer C : Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 25:637-646, 1997.

13.

13. Bendick PJ , Juleff RS , Glover JL : Arterial adaptation to increased wall shear stress. Vasc Surg 31:153-161, 1997.

14.

14. Farison JB , Begeman GA , Salles-Cunha SX , et al: Improved Determination of Vascular Blood Flow Shear Rate Using Doppler Ultrasound. Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Medical Imaging, Newport Beach, CA, Feb. 22-28, 1997, Vol. 3033: Physiology and Function from Multidimensional Images, Proceedings.

15.

15. Begeman GA: Determination and display of wall shear rate in arterial blood flow using longitudinal and transverse Doppler ultrasound color velocity images [master's thesis]. Toledo, OH: The University of Toledo; 1997.

16.

16. Slack SM , Cui Y , Turitto VT : The effects of flow on blood coagulation and thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 70:129-134, 1993.

17.

17. Lipowsky HH : Shear stress in the circulation. In: Flow-Dependent Regulation of Vascular Function, ed. by Bevam JA , Kaley G , Rubanyi GM . New York: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp 28-45.

18.

18. Kroll MH , Hellums JD , McIntire LV , et al: Platelets and shear stress. Blood 88:1525-1541, 1996.

19.

19. Clowes AW , Gown AM , Hanson SR , et al: Mechanisms of arterial graft failure. 1. Role of cellular proliferation in early healing of PTFE prostheses. Am J Pathol 118:43-54, 1985.

20.

20. Clowes AW , Kirkman TR , Clowes MM : Mechanisms of arterial graft failure. II. Chronic endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation in healing polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses. J Vasc Surg 3:877-884, 1986.

21.

21. Diamond SL , Eskin SG , McIntire LV : Fluid flow stimulates tissue plasminogen activator secretion by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 243:1483-1485, 1989.

22.

22. Grabowski EF , Jaffe EA , Weksler BB : Prostacyclin production by cultured endothelial cell monolayers exposed to step increases in shear stress. J Lab Clin Med 105:36-43, 1985.

23.

23. Pohl U , Busse R , Kuon E , et al: Pulsatile perfusion stimulates the release of endothelial autacoids. J Appl Cardiol 1:215-235, 1986.

24.

24. Taylor CA , Hughes TJ , Zarins CK : Effect of exercise on hemodynamic conditions in the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 29:1077-1089, 1999.

25.

25. Zarins CK , Zatina MA , Giddens DP , et al: Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diameter in experimental atherogenesis. J Vasc Surg 5:413-420, 1987.

26.

26. Zwolak RM , Adams MC , Clowes AW : Kinetics of vein graft hyperplasia: Association with tangential stress. JVasc Surg 5:126-136, 1987.

27.

27. Brooks DE , Goodwin JW , Seaman GV : Interactions among erythrocytes under shear. J Appl Physiol 28:172-177, 1970.

28.

28. Whitmore RL : Rheology of blood. In: Rheology of the Circulation. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1968, pp 62-89.

29.

29. Greenwald SE , Berry CL : Improving vascular grafts: The importance of mechanical and haemodynamic properties. J Pathol 190:292-299, 2000.

30.

30. Fredrickson BJ , Turner NA , Kleiman NS , et al: Effects of abciximab, ticlopidine, and combined abciximab/ ticlopidine therapy on platelet and leukocyte function in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Circulation 101:1122-1129, 2000.