A Comparison of Patch Angioplasty and Stenting for Axillary Venous Stenoses of Thrombosed Hemodialysis Grafts

Abstract

The efficacy of balloon angioplasty with stent placement is compared to surgical patch angioplasty for thrombosed upper arm hemodialysis grafts with stenotic lesions at the venous anastomosis. Patients with thrombosed hemodialysis grafts terminating at the axillary vein were reviewed. Thirty-eight stents were placed after thrombectomy and venous balloon angioplasty in 26 patients. Fifteen case-matched controls underwent 23 polytetrafluoroethylene patch angioplasties for similar lesions. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for statistical comparison. Primary patency for stent placement compared with patch angioplasty was not statistically different at any time through 1-year follow-up (37% vs 55% at 3 months, 25% vs 45% at 6 months, and 25% vs 15% at 12 months, respectively; p = 0.37). Secondary patency rates were slightly better for patch angioplasty compared with stent placement (78% vs 59% at 3 months, 78% vs 48% at 6 months, and 54% vs 32% at 12 months, respectively) however these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.13). There was no difference in complication rates between groups. Sustained patency is poor for both angioplasty with stent placement and surgical patch angioplasty when revising thrombosed dialysis grafts with anastomotic axillary vein stenosis. These data suggest slightly better patency for the routine use of patch angioplasty for these lesions. However, the endovascular approach appears to be a reasonable alternative when surgical exposure is difficult.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. USRDS, Prevalence of ESRD : United States Renal Data System, 2000.

2. Hoffer EK , Sultan S , Herskowitz MM , et al: Prospective randomized trial of a metallic intravascular stent in hemodialysis graft maintenance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:965-973, 1997.

3. Kanterman RY , Vesely TM , Pilgram TK , et al: Dialysis access grafts: Anatomic location of venous stenosis and results of angioplasty. Radiology, 195:135-139, 1995.

4. Dougherty MJ , Calligaro KD , Schindler N , et al: Endovascular versus surgical treatment for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: A prospective, randomized study. J Vasc Surg 30:1016-1023, 1999.

5. Marston WA , Criado E , et al: Prospective randomized comparison of surgical versus endovascular management of thrombosed dialysis grafts. J Vasc Surg 26:373-380, 1997.

6. Funaki B , Szymski GX , Leef JA , et al: Treatment of venous outflow stenoses in thigh grafts with Wallstents. Am J Roentgenol 172:1591-1596, 1999.

7. Lumsden AB , MacDonald MJ , Isiklar H , et al: Central venous stenosis in the hemodialysis patient: Incidence and efficacy of endovascular treatment. Cardiovasc Surg 5:504-509, 1997.

8. Patel RI , Peck SH , Cooper SG , et al: Patency of Wallstents placed across the venous anastomosis of hemodialysis grafts after percutaneous recanalization. Radiology 209:365-370, 1998.

9. Funaki B , Zaleski GX : Venous anastomosis of hemodialysis grafts. Radiology 211:586-586, 1999.

10.

10. Murray SP , Kinney TB , Valji K , et al: Early rethrombosis of clotted hemodialysis grafts: Graft salvage achieved with an aggressive approach. Am J Roentgenol 175:529-532, 2000.

11.

11. Bethard GA : Gianturco self-expanding stents in the treatment of stenosis in dialysis access grafts. Kidney Int 43:872-877, 1993.

12.

12. Gray RJ , Horton KM , Dolmatch BL , et al: Use of Wallstents for hemodialysis access-related venous stenoses and occlusions untreatable with balloon angioplasty. Radiology 195:479-484, 1995.