Routine Early Postoperative Duplex Scanning is Unnecessary Following Uncomplicated Carotid Endarterectomy

Abstract

Although early postoperative duplex scanning has become routine after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), it is unclear whether the results of these scans alter clinical management. The purpose of this study was to critically examine the usefulness of early postoperative duplex scans in evaluating the ipsilateral carotid artery (for technical perfection) as well as the contralateral carotid artery (for potential velocity changes after improvements in ipsilateral flow). Consecutive patients undergoing CEA between January 1995 and June 1999 in a tertiary hospital setting were studied. Patients underwent early postoperative duplex scanning according to the discretion of the operating surgeon and the availability of the patient. In 212 patients 236 CEAs were performed with selective use of patch closure (49%), intraluminal shunting (19%), and intraoperative completion imaging studies (1 4%). Neurologic complications included 3 transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (1.3%), 3 nondisabling strokes (1.3%), and 3 disabling strokes (1.3%). There was 1 30-day death from myocardial infarction. Patients were followed up for a median of 18 months (range 0-72 months). Sixty-five percent of patients undergoing uncomplicated CEA (147/227) underwent early duplex surveillance within 6 months of operation. Unsuspected sonographic abnormalities were discovered in 8 patients (5%), including 7 cases of mild internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (> 50% by velocity criteria) and 1 case of common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis (intimal flap). None of the patients with ICA stenosis developed symptoms or required operation at any time. The CCA intimal flap was electively repaired without complication. Postoperative changes in velocity in the contralateral ICA were found in 8/48 (17%) cases. There were 3 cases of increased velocity, upgrading 1 from 0-49% to 50-79% stenosis and upgrading 2 from 50-79% to 80-99% stenosis. The latter patients both underwent uneventful contralateral CEA. There were 6 cases of decreased velocity, resulting in downgrading of stenoses from 50-79% to 0-49% (n = 5) or from 80-99% to 50-79% (n = 1). Only the latter patient underwent contralateral CEA; the remainder have been followed up without intervention. Early scanning appeared to offer no clinical benefit; survival and neurologic outcome were the same in the 135 patients scanned within the first 6 months as in the 68 patients whose first postoperative scan occurred later (4-year neurologic event rate 0% in both groups; patient survival with early duplex 98 ± 1.5%, without early duplex 96 ±2.6%; p = NS). Early ipsilateral duplex abnormalities following CEA are infrequent in asymptomatic patients and, even if found, rarely alter management. Patients with bilateral stenosis being considered for contralateral CEA should undergo repeat duplex scanning after the first operation, because of the significant rate (19%) of contralateral velocity changes induced by ipsilateral CEA.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. NASCET Collaborators : Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with highgrade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445-453, 1991.

2. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atheroscleroses Study : Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421-1428, 1995.

3. CASANOVA study group : Carotid surgery versus medical therapy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 22:1229-1235, 1991.

4. Zierler R , Bandyk D , Thiele B , et al: Carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy. Arch Surg 117:1408-1415, 1982.

5. Nicholls S . Phillips DJ , Bergelin R , et al: Carotid endarterectomy. Relationship of outcome to early restenosis. J Vasc Surg 2:375-381, 1985.

6. Ackroyd N , Lane R , Appleberg M : Carotid endarterectomy: Long-term follow-up with specific reference to recurrent stenosis, contralateral progression, morality and recurrent neurologic episodes. J Cardiovasc Surg 27:418-425, 1986.

7. Cook J , Thomson B , Barnes R : Is routine duplex examination after carotid endarterectomy justified? J Vasc Surg 12:334-340, 1990.

8. Mattos M , van Bemmelen P , Barkmeir L , et al: Routine surveillance after carotid endarterectomy: Does it affect clinical management? J Vasc Surg 17:819-831, 1993.

9. Ricotta J , O'Brien-Irr M : Conservative management of residual and recurrent lesions after carotid endarterectomy: Long-term results. J Vasc Surg 26:963-972, 1997.

10.

10. Cantelmo N , Cutler B , Wheeler H , et al: Noninvasive detection of carotid stenosis following endarterectomy. Arch Surg 116:1005-1008, 1981.

11.

11. Baker W . Hays A , Mahler D , et al: Durability of carotid endarterectomy. Surgery 94:112-115, 1983.

12.

12. Piepgras D , Sundt T , Marsh W , et al: Recurrent carotid stenosis: Results and complications in 57 operations. Ann Surg 203:205-213, 1986.

13.

13. Roth S , Back M , Bandyk D , et al: A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 30:453-460, 1999.

14.

14. Carballo R , Towne J , Seabrook G , et al: An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: The incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis. J Vasc Surg 23:49-54, 1996.

15.

15. AbuRahma A , Robinson P , Mullins D , et al: Frequency of postoperative carotid duplex surveillance and type of closure: Results from a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 32:1043-1051, 2000.

16.

16. Mansour M , Webb K , Kang S , et al: Timing and frequency of perioperative carotid color-flow duplex scanning: A preliminary report. J Vasc Surg 29:833-837, 1999.

17.

17. Roederer G , Langlois Y , Lusiani L , et al: Natural history of carotid artery disease on the side contralateral to endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1:62-72, 1984.

18.

18. Zierler R , Strandness D : Noninvasive dynamic and real-time assessment of extracranial cerebrovasculature. In: Cerebral Blood Flow: Physiologic and Clinical Aspects, ed. by Wood JH . New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987, pp 311-323.

19.

19. Moore W , Mohr J , Najafi H , et al: Carotid endarterectomy: Practice guidelines. J Vasc Surg 15:469-479, 1992.

20.

20. Baldwin Z ., Meyerson S . Skelly C , et al: Estimating the contemporary in-hospital costs of carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 14:210-215, 2000.

21.

21. Samson R . Showalter D , Yunis J . et al: Hemodynamically significant early recurrent carotid stenosis: An often self-limiting and self-reversing condition. J Vasc Surg 30:446-452, 1999.

22.

22. Healy D , Zierler R , Nichols S . et al: Long-term follow-up and clinical outcome of carotid restenosis. J Vasc Surg 10:662-669, 1989.

23.

23. Golledge J , Cummings R , Ellis M , et al: Duplex imaging findings predict stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 26:43-48, 1997.

24.

24. Forconi S , Johnston K : Effect of contralateral internal carotid stenosis on the accuracy of continuous wave Doppler spectral analysis results. J Cardiovasc Surg 28:715-718, 1987.

25.

25. AbuRahama A , Richmond B. , Robinson P. et al: Effect of contralateral severe stenosis or carotid occlusion on duplex criteria of ipsilateral stenoses: Comparative study of various duplex parameters. J Vasc Surg 22:751-762, 1995.

26.

26. Spadone D , Barkmeier L , Hodgson K , et al: Contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion: Pitfall of correct ipsilateral classification a study performed with color flow imaging. J Vasc Surg 11:642-649, 1990.

27.

27. Welch H. , Murphy M , Raftery K , et al: Carotid duplex with contralateral disease: The influence of vertebral artery blood flow. Ann Vasc Surg 14:82-88, 2000.