The purpose of this study was to review experience with carotid artery surgery based on findings obtained solely from duplex scanning with special regard to unexpected findings during surgery and the early outcome. From January 1993 through December 1999, 271 consecutive patients underwent 287 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs), 229 (80%) of which were performed solely based on duplex scan findings. During the study period 5,932 carotid artery duplex scans were performed in 4,466 patients. Of 589 patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis? 70%, 246 underwent CEA compared to 25 of 156 with 50-69% ICA stenosis. The indications for CEA were transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 88 (30.7%), amaurosis fugax in 60 (20.9%), previous stroke in 91 (31.7%) and asymptomatic disease in 48 (16.7%) cases.
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups operated on with and without preoperative angiography with respect to the indications for surgery, associated risk factors, or the degree of stenosis on the contralateral side. In patients undergoing surgery without angiography, there were no unexpected findings that influenced the performance of surgery, in all except 1. There were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery with and without conventional angiography. The combined mortality and major stroke rates were 3.4% and 2.2%, respectively.
It is concluded that CEA can safely be performed without preoperative angiography in cases with conclusive duplex scan findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet337:1235-1243, 1991.
2.
2. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators: Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with highgrade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med325:445-453, 1991.
4. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study: Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA273:1421-1428, 1995.
5.
5. Zhu CZ, Norris JW: Role of carotid stenosis in ischemic stroke. Stroke21:1131-1134, 1990.
6.
6. Carolei A, Marini C, Nencini P, et al, and the National Research Council Study Group: Prevalence and outcome of symptomatic carotid lesions in young adults. BMJ310:1363-1366, 1995.
7.
7. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP: Symptomatic carotid ischaemic events: Safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography, before carotid endarterectomy. BMJ300:1485-1491, 1990.
8.
8. Ricotta JJ, Holen J, Schenk E, et al: Is routine angiography necessary prior to carotid endarterectomy?J Vasc Surg1:96-102, 1984.
9.
9. Gelbart JP, Moore WS: Carotid endarterectomy without angiography. Surg Clin North Am70:213-223, 1990.
10.
10. Dawson DL, Zierler E, Strandness DE, et al: The role of duplex scanning and arteriography before carotid endarterectomy: A prospective study. J Vasc Surg18:673-683, 1993.
11.
11. Mattos MA, Hodgson KJ, Faught WE, et al: Carotid endarterectomy without angiography: Is color-flow duplex scanning sufficient?Surgery116:776-783, 1994.
12.
12. Shifrin EG, Bornstein NM, Kantarovsky A, et al: Carotid endarterectomy without angiography. Br J Surg83:1107-1109, 1996.
13.
13. Golledge J, Wright R, Pugh N, et al: Colour-coded duplex assessment alone before carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg83:1234-1237, 1996.
14.
14. Muto PM, Welch HJ, Mackey WC, et al: Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: Is duplex ultrasonography sufficient?J Vasc Surg24:17-22, 1996.
15.
15. Khaw K-T: Does carotid duplex imaging render angiography redundant before carotid endarterectomy?Br J Radiol70:235-238, 1997.
16.
16. Samson RH, Bandyk DF, Showalter DP, et al: Carotid endarterectomy based on duplex ultrasonography: A safe approach associated with long-term stroke prevention. Vasc Surg34:125-136, 2000.
17.
17. Zwolak RM: Carotid endarterectomy without angiography: Are we ready?Vasc Surg31:1-9, 1997.
18.
18. Logason K, Karacagil S, Bostrdm A, et al: Early postoperative duplex scanning after carotid artery endarterectomy. J Vasc Invest4: 147-149, 1998.
19.
19. Kuntz KM, Skillman JJ, Whittemore AD, et al: Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: Is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis. J Vasc Surg22:706-716, 1995.
20.
20. Alexandrov AV, Vital D, Brodie DS, et al: Grading carotid stenosis with ultrasound. An interlaboratory comparison. Stroke28:1208-1210, 1997.
21.
21. Eliasziw M, Rankin RN, Fox AJ, et al: Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. Stroke26:1747-1752, 1995.
22.
22. Hunink MGM, Polak JF, Barlan MM, et al: Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: Efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters. AJR160:619-625, 1993.
23.
23. Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, et al: Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70%-99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg17:152-159, 1993.
24.
24. Faught WE, Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, et al: Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries. New velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. J Vasc Surg19:818-828, 1994.
25.
25. Neale ML, Chambers JL, Kelly AT, et al: Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. J Vasc Surg20:642-649, 1994.
26.
26. Hood DB, Mattos MA, Mansour A, et al: Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg23:254-262, 1996.
27.
27. Alexandrov AV, Blandin CF, Maggisano R, et al: Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for reappraisal. Stroke24:1292-1296, 1993.
28.
28. Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM, et al: Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography and magnetic resonance angiography: Correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg21:82-89, 1995.
29.
29. Chikos PM, Fischer LD, Hirsch JH, et al: Observer variability in evaluating extracranial carotid artery stenosis. Stroke14:885-892, 1983.
30.
30. Kuntz KM, Polak JF, Whittemore AD, et al: Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific. Stroke28:597-602, 1997.
31.
31. Curley PJ, Norrie L, Nicholson A, et al: Accuracy of carotid duplex is laboratory specific and must be determined by internal audit. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg15:511-514, 1998.
32.
32. Elgersma OEH, van Leersum M, Buijs PC, et al: Changes over time in optimal duplex threshold for the identification of patients eligible for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke29:2352-2356, 1998.
33.
33. Nicolaides AN, Shifrin EG, Bradsbury A, et al: Angiographic and duplex grading of internal carotid stenosis: Can we overcome the confusion?J Endovasc Surg3:158-165, 1996.
34.
34. Akers DL, Markowitz IA, Kerstein MD. The value of aortic arch study in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency. Am J Surg154:230-232, 1987.
35.
35. Kadwa AM, Robbs JV, Abdool-Carrim ATO: Aortic arch angiography prior to carotid endarterectomy. Is its continued use justified?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg13:527-530, 1997.
36.
36. Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP, Lim LT, et al: The effect of carotid siphon on stroke rate, death, and relief of symptoms following elective carotid endarterectomy. Surgery92:1058-1067, 1982.
37.
37. Kappelle LJ, Eliaziw M, Fox AJ, et al, for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group: Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke30:282-286, 1999.
38.
38. Ladowski JS, Webster MW, Yonas HO, et al: Carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic intracranial aneurysms. Ann Surg200:70-73, 1986.
39.
39. Orecchia PM, Clagett AP, Yonkey JR, et al: Management of patients with symptomatic extracranial carotid artery disease and incidental intracranial berry aneurysms. J Vasc Surg1: 158-164, 1985.
40.
40. Bornstein NM, Beloev ZG, Norris JW: The limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusions by Doppler ultrasound. Ann Surg207:315-317, 1988.
41.
41. AbuRahma AF, Pollack JA, Robinson PA, et al: The reliability of color duplex ultrasound in diagnosing total carotid artery occlusion. Am J Surg174:185-187, 1997.
42.
42. Ferrer JME, Samso JJ, Serrando JR, et al: Use of ultrasound contrast in the diagnosis of carotid artery occlusion. J Vasc Surg31:736-741, 2000.
43.
43. Hill SL, Holtzman GL, Berry R, et al: The appropriate use of the duplex scan in carotid arterial disease. Am Surg63:720-725, 1997.
44.
44. Deriu GP, Milite D, Damiani N, et al: Carotid endarterectomy without angiography: A prospective randomised pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg20:250-253, 2000.
