In 1985, Florida established a groundbreaking approach to growth management and intergovernmental relations, which the state’s 2011 Community Planning Act is widely described as ending. This paper presents a history and institutional analysis of policy changes for the State’s core consistency doctrine. It concludes that the CPA did not end growth management since Florida retains the mandate for local planning consistent with state growth management criteria and subject to state review. However, it does formalize diminished state authority over local planning. Florida’s current institutional arrangement for planning involves an assertive state rule-making stance, but shifts planning responsibility to local governments.
Ben-ZadokE.2005. “Consistency, Concurrency, and Compact Development: Three Faces of Growth Management Implementation in Florida.” Urban Studies42, no. 12: 2167-2190.
2.
Ben ZadokE.Consistency, Concurrency, and Compact Development: Three Faces of Growth Management Implementation in Florida. In Growth Management in Florida: Planning for Paradise, edited by Chapin T., Connerly C., and Higgins H., 21-50. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007.
3.
Ben ZadokE.2012. “Policy Changes Through Decision Models: Planning and Implementing Florida Growth Management, 1970-2010.” International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development4, no. 2: 198-218.
4.
Ben ZadokE.2013. “Policy Change Through Policy Design: Florida Concurrency, 1985-2010.” Planning, Practice, and Research28, no. 5: 589-611.
5.
Ben-ZadokE.GaleD.2001. “Innovation and Reform, Intentional Inaction, and Tactical Breakdown: The Implementation Record of the Florida Concurrency Policy.” Urban Affairs Review36, no. 6: 836-871.
6.
Ben-ZadokE.Understanding Policy Learning and Change Through Policy Beliefs: Florida Smart Growth. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development2018; 10(2): 123–138.
7.
BerkeP.CooperJ.AmintoM.GrabichS.HorneyJ.2014. “Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States.” Journal of the American Planning Association80, no. 4, 310-323.
8.
BerkeP.RoenigkD.KaiserE.BurbyR.1996. “Enhancing Plan Quality: Evaluating the Role of State Planning Mandates for Natural Hazard Mitigation.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39, no. 1, 79-96.
9.
BodaC.2018. “The Entrepreneurial Sunshine State: Neoliberalism, Growth Management, and Environmental Conservation in Florida.” Journal of Urban Affairs40, no. 6: 838-862.
10.
BuitelaarE.2007. The Cost of Land Use Decisions: Applying Transaction Cost Economics to Planning and Development.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
11.
BuitelaarE.2004. “A Transaction-Cost Analysis of the Land Development Process.” Urban Studies41 (13): 2539-2553.
12.
BurbyR.MayP.1997. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
BunnellG.JepsonE.Jr.2011. “The Effect of Mandated Planning on Plan Quality: A Fresh Look at What Makes ‘A Good Plan’.” Journal of the American Planning Association77, no. 4, 338-353.
14.
ButlerW.HolmesT.LangeZ.2021. “Mandated Planning for Climate Change: Responding to the Peril of Flood Act for Sea Level Rise Adaptation in Florida.” Journal of the American Planning Association87, no. 3: 370-382.
ChapinT.ConnerlyC.HigginsH.2007a. “Introduction.” In Growth Management in Florida: Planning for Paradise, edited by ChapinT.ConnerlyC.HigginsH., 1-4. Burlington: Ashgate.
17.
ChapinT.ThompsonG.BrownJ.2007b. Rethinking the Florida Transportation Concurrency Mandate. Florida Department of Community Affairs White Paper, August.
18.
ConroyM.BerkeP.2004. “What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan? An Analysis of Factors that Influence Principles of Sustainable Development.” Environment and Planning A36, no. 8, 1381-1396.
19.
DaltonL.BurbyR.1994. “Mandates, Plans, and Planners: Building Local Commitment to Development Management.” Journal of the American Planning Association60, no. 4, 444-461.
20.
DeGroveJ.2005. Planning Policy and Politics: Smart Growth and the States. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
21.
DeslatteA.2011. “Developers Helped Gut Florida’s Growth Act, Records Show.” Orlando Sentinel, September 4. Accessed September 9, 2020. http://orlandosentinel.com
22.
DeslatteA.2016. “Boundaries and Speed Bumps: The Role of Modernized Counties Managing Growth in the Fragmented Metropolis.” Urban Affairs Review53, no. 4, 658-688.
23.
DeslatteA.2018. “Florida’s Growth Management Experience: From Top-Down Direction to Laissez Faire Land Use.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability: Case Studies and Practical Solutions, edited by BrinkmannR.GarrenS. J., 739-755. Springer.
24.
ELMS III. 1992. Final Report: Building Successful Communities. ELMS III Committee.
Florida Statutes Chapter 163.2511-325. 2020. “Growth Policy; County and Municipal planning; Land Development Regulation. State of Florida.”
27.
Florida Senate Committee on Comprehensive Planning, Local and Military Affairs. 2000. Sustainable Communities Demonstration Project.Interim Project Report 2001-034.
28.
GaleD.1992. “Eight State-Sponsored Growth Management Programs.” Journal of the American Planning Association58, no. 4: 425-439.
29.
HackerJ.2004. “Privatizing Risk Without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review98, no. 2: 243-260.
30.
HochC.2007. “How Plan Mandates Work: Affordable Housing in Illinois.” Journal of the American Planning Association73, no. 1: 86-99.
31.
HohnadellK.2013. “Community Planning Act: The End of Meaningful Growth Management in Florida.” 42 Stetson Law Review715: 727-731.
32.
HolmesT.ButlerW.2021. “Implementing a Mandate for Sea Level Rise: Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Middle-Out Actions in the Tampa Bay Region.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management64, no. 12: 2214-2232.
33.
IngramG.CarbonellA.HongY.FlintA.2009. Smart Growth Policies: An Evaluation of Programs and Outcomes. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
34.
InnesJ.1992. “Group Processes and the Social Construction of Growth Management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey.” Journal of the American Planning Association58, no. 4: 440-453.
35.
InnesJ. Implementing State Growth Management in the U.S.: Strategies for Coordination. University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working Paper No. 542, 1991.
LinkousE.ChapinT.2014. “TDR Program Performance in Florida.” Journal of the American Planning Association80, no. 3: 253-267.
38.
LinkousE.SkuzinskiT.2018. Land Use Decision-making in the Wake of State Property Rights Legislation: Examining the Institutional Response to Florida’s Harris Act. Land Use Policy77: 603-612.
39.
Loomis ShelleyL.BrodeenK.2011. Home Rule Redux: The Community Planning Act of 2011. Florida Bar Journal85, no. 7: 49.
40.
MahoneyJ.2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society29, no. 4: 507-548.
41.
MahoneyJ.ThelenK.2005. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MarkellD.2016. Emerging Legal and Institutional Responses to Sea-Level Rise in Florida and Beyond. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law42, no. 1: 1-58.
43.
MayP.BurbyR.1996. Coercive Versus Cooperative Policies: Comparing Intergovernmental Mandate Performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management15, no. 2: 171-201.
44.
MatthewsR.2011Issue Brief: Growth Management. Florida League of Cities, 2011.
45.
PallagstK.2007. Growth Management in the U.S.: Between Theory and Practice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
46.
PelhamT.HydeW.BanksR.1985. “Managing Florida’s Growth: Toward an Integrated State, Regional, and Local Comprehensive Planning Process.” Florida State University Law Review13, no. 3: 515-598.
47.
PelhamT.1992. “Shaping Florida’s Future: Toward More Compact, Efficient, and Livable Development Patterns.” Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law7, no. 2: 321-332.
48.
PelhamT.2001. “Restructuring Florida’s Growth Management System: Alternative Approaches to Plan Implementation and Concurrency.” 12 University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy 299.
49.
PelhamT.2007. “A Historical Perspective for Evaluating Florida’s Evolving Growth Management Process.” In Growth Management in Florida: Planning for Paradise, edited by ChapinT.ConnerlyC.HigginsH., 7-19. Burlington: Ashgate.
50.
RudolfS.GradinăruS.HerspergerA.2017. “Impact of Planning Mandates on Local Plans: A Multi-Method Assessment.” European Planning Studies25, no. 12: 2192-2211.
51.
Research Institute on Social and Economic Policy. 2009. How Fair is Florida?: Recession, Recovery, Equity, and Opportunity in Florida. Kirwin Institute, Ohio State University.
52.
St Petersburg Times. 2011. An Obituary for Florida Growth Management. St. Petersburg Times, June 5.
53.
SteinerR.2001. “Florida’s Transportation Concurrency: Are the Current Tools Adequate to Meet the Need for Coordinated Land Use and Transportation Planning.” University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy12, no. 2: 269-298.
54.
SteinerR.2007. “Transportation Concurrency: An Idea Before its Time?” In Growth Management in Florida: Planning for Paradise, edited by ChapinT.ConnerlyC.HigginsH., 209-226. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
55.
StroudN.2012. “A History and New Turns in Florida’s Growth Management Reform.” John Marshall Law Review45, no. 2: 397-415.
56.
SorensenA.2015. “Taking Path Dependency Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspectives30, no. 1: 17-38.
57.
TrevarthenS.FriedmanC.2005. “Senate Bill 360: Growth Management Reform Arrives and it is All About Infrastructure.” The Florida Bar Journal79, no. 9: 39.
58.
WebsterC.2005. “The New Institutional Economics and the Evolution of Modern Urban Planning: Insights, Issues, and Lessons.” Town Planning Review76, no. 4: 455-484.
59.
WebsterC. J.LaiL. W. C.2003. Property Rights, Planning, and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities.cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
60.
WeitzJ.1999. “From Quiet Revolution to Smart Growth: State Growth Management Programs, 1960 to 1999.” Journal of Planning Literature14, no. 2: 266-337.
61.
WrightT.1985. “Should the DRI Process be Abolished?” Florida State University Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law1, no. 2: 185-188.
