In the 1920s, traffic congestion was one of the primary issues concerning urban planners. At the time, traffic mitigation efforts boiled down to a fundamental conundrum: was the solution to traffic congestion more roads or more rules? This article chronicles the debates over traffic congestion relief in downtown Boston during that period, analyzing the two radical, competing proposals of roads, in the form of a major new surface thoroughfare called the Loop Highway, versus rules, in the form of stricter parking regulations. The article analyzes the debates over these proposals and the reasons why the city adopted neither approach. While politics had its hand in dooming the proposals, poor planning played a central role as well. The lack of a comparative analytical framework for evaluating the competing “roads” and “rules” proposals gave detractors the ammunition to oppose either approach on the grounds that the alternative approach would be superior.
Adams, J. C.1896. What a great city might be—A lesson from the White City. New England Magazine (New Series), March, pp. 3-13.
2.
Banfield, E. C., and J. Q. Wilson.1963. City politics. New York: Vintage.
3.
Barrett, P.1983. The automobile and urban transit: The formation of public policy in Chicago, 1900-1930. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
Barrett, P., and M. H. Rose. 1999. Street smarts: The politics of transportation statistics in the American city, 1900-1990. Journal of Urban History25:405-433.
5.
Boston Board of Street Commissioners. 1926. Street traffic regulations and rules for driving.
6.
Reprinted in Boston Globe, January 7 (p.m.), p. 29.
7.
Boston City Planning Board. 1922. Eighth annual report of the City Planning Board for the year ending January 31, 1922. Boston: Boston City Planning Board.
8.
Boston City Planning Board. 1924. Tenth annual report of the City Planning Board for the year ending January 31, 1924. Document 8 in Boston City Documents. Boston: Boston City Planning Board.
9.
Boston City Planning Board. 1925. Progress report on proposed intermediate thoroughfare. Boston: Boston City Planning Board.
10.
Boston City Planning Board. 1930. Report on a thoroughfare plan for Boston. Boston: Boston City Planning Board.
11.
Boston Chamber of Commerce, Civic Bureau. 1928. Memorandum for committee on traffic control and safety (prepared December 1). Boston: Boston Chamber of Commerce, Civic Bureau.
12.
Bottles, S. L.1987. Los Angeles and the automobile: The making of the modern city. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Dalton, C., J. Wirkkala, and A. Thomas.1984. Leading the way: A history of the Massachusetts General Court, 1629-1980. Boston: Office of the Massachusetts Secretary of State.
14.
Ellis, C. D. 1990. Visions of urban freeways, 1930-1970. Ph.D. diss., City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley.
15.
Fairfield, J. D.1994. The scientific management of urban space: Professional city planning and the legacy of Progressive reform. Journal of Urban History20:179-204.
16.
Fogelson, R. M.2001. Downtown: Its rise and fall, 1880-1950. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Formisano, R. P., and C. K. Burns, eds. 1984. Boston 1700-1980: The evolution of urban politics. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
18.
Foster, M.1981. From streetcar to superhighway: American city planners and urban transportation, 1900-1940. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
19.
Gibson, C.2004. Population of the 100 largest cities and other urban places in the United States: 1790 to 1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, November 2, 1998. http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0027.html (accessed June 20, 2004).
20.
Green, A. D. 1979. Planning the Central Artery: Constraints on planners and the limits of planning in Boston, 1909-1979. A.B. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
21.
Luberoff, D., and A. Altshuler.1996. A political and institutional analysis of Boston’s Central Artery/Tunnel Project. Cambridge, MA: New England University Transportation Center.
22.
Massachusetts General Court. 1924. Resolve providing for a Special Commission to Investigate the Matter of Laying Out and Constructing a New Thoroughfare in the City of Boston and the extension and widening of certain streets in connection therewith. In Laws and resolves of Massachusetts passed by the General Court in the year of 1924. Boston: Secretary of the Commonwealth.
23.
Massachusetts Metropolitan District Commission, Division of Metropolitan Planning. 1927. Report on improved transportation facilities in the Boston Metropolitan District. Boston: Massachusetts Metropolitan District Commission.
24.
McClintock, M.1925. Street traffic control. New York: McGraw Hill.
25.
McClintock, M.. 1928. A report on the street traffic control problem of the city of Boston. Boston: n.p.
26.
McShane, C.1994. Down the asphalt path: The automobile and the American city. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
McShane, C.1999. The origins and globalization of traffic control signals. Journal of Urban History25:379-404.
28.
Seely, B. E.1987. Building the American highway system: Engineers as policy makers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
Special Commission on Laying Out and Constructing New Thoroughfare. 1925. Final Report of Special Commission on Laying Out and Constructing New Thoroughfare and the extension and widening of certain streets in connection therewith.
30.
Reprinted in Current Affairs16 (32, suppl.).
31.
Special Commission to Investigate the Boston Intermediate Thoroughfare. 1925. Document no. 1160: Further report of the Special Commission. In Massachusetts legislative documents. Boston: Secretary of the Commonwealth.
32.
Weinstein, A. 2002. The congestion evil: Perceptions of traffic congestion in Boston in the 1890s and 1920s. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
