In this article, we share our conceptualization of what we term as a servingness praxis framework, which includes building blocks that derive/bridge/expand on the theoretical concept of “servingness” introduced by Gina A. García. We draw on Gonzalez, Moll and Amanti’s work on Funds of Knowledge (FoK) and Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Pedagogy (CLSP). We define and explain how the relational, experiential, and reciprocal building blocks expand on servingness, shifting from theory to practice.
Delgado BernalD. (2001). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestiza consciousness of Chicana students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(5), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110059838
2.
Delgado BernalD.BurciagaR.Flores CarmonaJ (Eds.). (2012). Chicana/Latina testimonios: Methodologies, pedagogies, and political urgency [Special issue]. Equity and Excellence in Education, 45(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.698149
3.
Flores CarmonaJ. (2014). Cutting out their tongues: Mujeres’ testimonios and the Malintzin researcher. Journal of Latino/Latin American Studies (JOLLAS) Special Issue: (Re)envisioning Chicana/Latina Feminist Methodologies, 6(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.18085/llas.6.2.gr44n072hhh72584
4.
GarcíaG. A. (2016). Complicating a Latina/o-serving identity at a Hispanic serving institution. The Review of Higher Education, 40(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2016.0040
5.
GarcíaG. A. (2018). Decolonizing Hispanic-serving institutions: A framework for organizing. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927177342
6.
GarcíaG. A. (2019). Becoming Hispanic-serving institutions: Opportunities at colleges and universities. Johns Hopkins University.
7.
GarcíaG. A. (2020). Transforming Hispanic serving institutions [Keynote address via Zoom]. University of California, Irvine, Inaugural Latinx Heritage Month.
8.
GarcíaO.JohnsonS. I.SeltzerK.ValdésG. (2017). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning (pp. v–xix). Caslon.
9.
García PeñaL. (2022). Community as rebellion: A syllabus for surviving academia as a woman of color. Haymarket Books.
10.
GonzalezN.MollL. C.AmantiC. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge. Routledge
11.
JosephT. D.HirschfieldL. E. (2010). Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489
MoragaC. (2002). Entering the lives of others: Theory in the flesh. In MoragaC.AnzaldúaG. E. (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (Rev. 3rd ed., pp. 1–21). Third Woman Press.
14.
NevilleM.JohnsonS. I. (2022). “My literacies expand over two languages”: Language and literacy autobiographies as justice-oriented teacher education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 66(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1258
New Mexico State University (NMSU). (2024). New Mexico cooperative extension service. Retrieved July 10, 2024, from https://extension.nmsu.edu/
17.
PadillaA. M. (1994). Ethnic minority scholars, research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024
18.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
19.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
