A fraction of the highly lucrative scientific, biomedical, and technology workforce is Hispanic. At all levels of scientific training, Hispanic students drop out at higher rates than their White and Asian peers. Hispanic college students often attend local colleges and live with their families. We created and evaluated an initiative based on Balanced Identity Design and Utility-Value theories to leverage families as a powerful resource for supporting Hispanic students’ engagement and persistence as STEM majors.
Allen-RamdialS. A.CampbellA. G. (2014). Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success. BioScience, 64(7), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu076
2.
California State Univeristy San Marcos (CSUSM). (2024). Reporting and Data Analytics Repository (RaDAR). Retrieved February 8, 2024https://radar.csusm.edu/
3.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
4.
ChemersM. M.ZurbriggenE. L.SyedM.GozaB. K.BearmanS. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
5.
ChlupD. T.GonzalezE. M.GonzalezJ. E.AldapeH. F.GuerraM.LagunasB.YuQ.ManzanoH.ZornD. R. (2018). Nuestros hijos van a la universidad [Our sons and daughters are going to college]: Latina parents’ perceptions and experiences related to building college readiness, college knowledge, and college access for their children—A qualitative analysis. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192716652
CvencekD.GreenwaldA. G.MeltzoffA. N. (2012). Balanced identity theory: Review of evidence for implicit consistency in social cognition. In GawronskiB.StrackF. (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A unifying concept in social psychology (pp. 157–177). Guilford Press.
8.
EcclesJ. S. (1993). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children’s interests, self-perceptions, and activity choice. In JacobsJ. (Ed.), Nebrasca symposium in motivation (pp. 145–208). University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.RudmanL. A.FarnhamS. D.NosekB. A.MellottD. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3
11.
HarackiewiczJ. M.CanningE. A.TibbettsY.PriniskiS. J.HydeJ. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075
12.
HarackiewiczJ. M.RozekC. S.HullemanC. S.HydeJ. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530
13.
Higher Education Research Institute. (2010). The Freshman Survey (TFS).
14.
HirshJ. B.KangS. K. (2016). Mechanisms of identity conflict: Uncertainty, anxiety, and the behavioral inhibition system. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315589475
15.
HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
16.
JacksonM. C.GalvezG.LandaI.BuonoraP.ThomanD. B. (2016). Science that matters: The importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar42. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0067
17.
MerollaD. M.SerpeR. T. (2013). STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: The role of science identity salience. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9233-7
18.
Milner-BolotinM.MarottoC. C. F. (2018). Parental engagement in children’s STEM education. Part I: Meta-analysis of the literature. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.6.1.292
19.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). The state of U.S. science and engineering 2022. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221.
National Science Board. (2019). Higher education in science and engineering. Science and engineering indicators 2020 (NSB-2019-7). https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20197/.
22.
National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. (Special Report NSF 17-310.). National Center for Science and Engineering Statisticswww.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
23.
Ramos CarranzaP.SimpkinsS. D. (2021). Parent and sibling science support for Latinx adolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 24(3), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09620-3
24.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage
25.
RendónL. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191156
26.
RiveraJ.NúñezA.-M.CovarrubiasI. (2024). Without my family, I don’t know if I would be here: The role of families in supporting Latinx computer science students at HSIs. Education Sciences, 14(8), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080815
27.
RodriguezS.CunninghamK.JordanA. (2019). STEM Identity development for Latinas: The role of self-and outside recognition. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 18(3), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717739958
28.
RothJ.SteffensM. C.VignolesV. L. (2018). Group membership, group change, and intergroup attitudes: A recategorization model based on cognitive consistency principles. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, e00479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479
29.
RozekC. S.SvobodaR. C.HarackiewiczJ. M.HullemanC. S.HydeJ. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5), 909–914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607386114
30.
SánchezB.ReyesO.SinghJ. (2006). Makin’ it in college: The value of significant individuals in the lives of Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 5(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192705282570
31.
SerpeR. T. (1991). The cerebral self: Thinking and planning about identity relevant activities. In HowardJ. A.CalleroP. J. (Eds.), The self society dynamic: Cognition, emotion and action (pp. 55–73). Cambridge University Press.
32.
SimpkinsS. D.LiuY.HsiehT.-Y.EstrellaG. (2020). Supporting Latino high school students’ science motivational beliefs and engagement: Examining the unique and collective contributions of family, teachers, and friends. Educational Psychology, 40(4), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1661974
33.
SimpkinsS. D.PriceC. D.GarciaK. (2015). Parental support and high school students’ motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among Latino and Caucasian boys and girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1386–1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21246
34.
Soto-LaraS.SimpkinsS. D. (2022). Parent support of Mexican-descent high school adolescents’ science education: A culturally grounded framework. Journal of Adolescent Research, 37(4), 541–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558420942478
35.
StrykerS.SerpeR. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts?Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786972
36.
TulaganN. B.PuenteK.SimpkinsS. D. (2023). Latinx adolescents’ school-related science conversations with family members: Associations with adolescents’ science expectancy-value beliefs in high school. Applied Developmental Science, 27(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2045201
37.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). New estimates highlight differences in growth between the U.S. Hispanic and Non-Hispanic populations. U.S. Census Bureau.
38.
ValantineH. A.CollinsF. S. (2015). National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12240–12242. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515612112
39.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
40.
WoodcockA.HernandezP. R.EstradaM.SchultzP. W. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029120
41.
WoodcockA.PedersenB.HernandezP. R.SchultzP. W. (2025). Balancing stereotypically compatible and incompatible identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251322088
42.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006