We study the impact of peer effects on the academic achievement of economics students in Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador (PUCE) Ecuador, for both semesters of 2018. The estimates from our random-effects model show a significant influence of the average-group, high-achieving, and low-achieving peers. These results are robust with the presence of socioeconomic, academic, and teaching quality covariates. The findings suggest that systems that prioritize course enrollment according to previous scores may exacerbate a peer-driven bias in student performance.
AndroushchakG.PoldinO.YudkevichM. (2013). Role of peers in student academic achievement in exogenously formed university groups. Educational Studies, 39(5), 568–581.
BeckerG. (1964). Human capital a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Columbia University Press.
4.
BowlesS. (1970). Towards an educational production function. In HansenL. (Ed.), Education, income, and human capital (pp. 11–70). National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
BroerM.BaiY.FonsecaF. (2019). A review of the literature on socioeconomic status and educational achievement. In BroerM.BaiY.FonsecaF. (Eds.), Socioeconomic inequality and educational outcomes (pp. 7–17). Springer.
6.
BuenañoE.BeletangaM. J.ManchenoM. (2021). Determinants of university dropout in Ecuador, evidence through a case study, using extended Cox models [Manuscript submitted for publication].
7.
CarrellS.FullertonR.WestJ. (2009). Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 439–464.
8.
ColemanJ. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U. S. Government Printing Office.
Gonzalez-GordonI.ResosudarmoB. P. (2019). A sectoral growth-income inequality nexus in Indonesia. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12125
12.
HanushekE. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production function. The Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351–388.
13.
HanushekE. (2020). Chapter 13—Education production functions. In BradleyS.GreenC. (Eds.), The economics of education (2nd ed., pp. 161–170). Academic Press.
14.
HanushekE.KainJ.MarkmanJ.RivkinS. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement?Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5), 527–544.
15.
HeckR.MarcoulidesG. (2006). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 7(1), 76–95.
IzaguirreA.Di CapuaL. (2020). Exploring peer effects in education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Research in Economics, 74(1), 1–30.
18.
KaoG. (2019). Unequal returns to children’s efforts: Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in teachers’ evaluations of children’s noncognitive skills and academic ability. Du Bois Review, 16(2), 417–438.
19.
LavyV.SilvaO.WeinhardtF. (2012). The good, the bad, and the average: Evidence on ability peer effects in schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(2), 367–414.
20.
MacneilA. J.PraterD.BuschS. (2009). The effects of school culture on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73–84.
MincerJ. (1970). The distribution of labor incomes: A survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 8(1), 1–26.
23.
MincerJ. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. Columbia University Press.
PUCE (2018a). Report of Student Grades 2018 (Database). School of Economics at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Retrieved March, 2020.
28.
PUCE (2018b). Hetero-evaluation Indicator Results 2018 (Database). Institute of Economic Research at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Retrieved October, 2021.
29.
PUCE (2018c). Socioeconomic Status SES 2018 (Database). General Students’ Office at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Retrieved March, 2020.
30.
VargasG. (2007). Factors associated with academic performance in university students, a reflection from the quality of public higher education. Revista Educación, 31(1), 43–63.
31.
VigdorJ.LudwingJ. (2010). Why peers and neighborhoods might matter. In BrewerD.McewanP. (Eds.), Economics of education (pp. 163–169). Elsevier.
32.
WangM.-T.KiuruN.DegolJ.Salmela-AroK. (2018). Friends, academic achievement, and school engagement during adolescence: A social network approach to peer influence and selection effects. Learning and Instruction, 58, 148–160.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
