Postsecondary co-enrollment, or simultaneous enrollment at multiple institutions, is becoming increasingly common among U.S. college students. This descriptive analysis documented the characteristics and co-enrollment patterns of Latinx/a/o students in the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (12/17). Findings of the study revealed that Latinx/a/o students co-enrolled at multiple postsecondary institutions at greater rates than all students combined, and that persistence and bachelor’s degree completion rates were higher for co-enrolled Latinx/a/o students than for all Latinx/a/o students.
AcevedoN. (2020). “Hopefully I can transfer”: Cooling out postsecondary aspirations of Latina/o/x students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(4), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1791281
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490195.pdf
3.
BachS. K.BanksM. T.KinnickM. K.RicksM. F.StoeringJ. M.WalleriR. D. (2000). Student attendance patterns and performance in an urban postsecondary environment. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 315–330.
4.
BahrP. R. (2012). Student flow between community colleges: Investigating lateral transfer. Research in Higher Education, 53, 94–121. https://doi.org/0.1007/s11162-011-9224-5
5.
BaileyD. (2003). “Swirling” changes to the traditional student path. Monitor, 34(11), Article 36.
BordenV. M. H. (2004). Accommodating student swirl: When traditional students are no longer the tradition. Change, 36, 10–17.
8.
BryanM.CooneyD.ElliottB. (2019). 2012/17 Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS:12/17, Data File Documentation, NCES 2020-522). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020522.pdf
9.
CaralesV. D. (2020). Examining educational attainment outcomes: A focus on Latina/o community college students. Community College Review, 48(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552120903087
10.
CoxR. D. (2016). Complicating conditions: Obstacles and interruptions to low-income students’ college “choices..” The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777392
11.
CrispG. (2013). The influence of co-enrollment on the success of traditional-age community college students. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–25.
12.
de BreyC.MusuL.McFarlandJ.Wilkinson-FlickerS.DilibertiM.ZhangA.BranstetterC.WangX. (2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019038.pdf
13.
de los SantosA. G.SuttonF. (2012). Swirling students: Articulation between a major community college district and a state-supported research university. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(12), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/1066892093182641
14.
de los SantosA. G.WrightL. (1990). Maricopa’s swirling students: Earning one-third of Arizona State’s bachelor’s degrees. Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, 60(6), 32–34.
15.
ElliottD. C.BrennemanM. W.CarneyL.RobbinsS. (2018). Social networks and minority male college access: The “tip of the iceberg” phenomena. Urban Education, 53(1), 1210–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915613551
16.
GoseB. (1995). Double dippers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 41(47), A27–A28.
17.
HerzogS. (2005). Measuring determinants of student return vs. dropout/stopout vs. transfer: A first-to-second year analysis of new freshmen. Research in Higher Education, 46(8), 863–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-6933-7
18.
HussarB.ZhangJ.HeinS.WangK.RobertsA.CuiJ.SmithM.Bullock MannF.BarmerA.DiligR. (2020). The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020-144). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020144
19.
JohnsonI. Y.MuseW. B. (2012). Student swirl at a single institution: The role of timing and student characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 53, 152–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9253-0
20.
KatsinasS.BrayN.HagedornL.DotherowS.MalleyM. (2019). From vertical to dynamic transfer: Recognizing continuous swirl in American higher education. Change, 51, 44–51.
21.
LamL. T. (2007, June2–6). Enrollment patters, time-to-degree, and degree progression for baccalaureate degree recipients at a large urban public university [Paper presentation]. Association for Institutional Research 47th Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, United States.
22.
MartinezE. (2018). College choice processes and experiences of Latino/a/x student-athletes in the community college context. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 12(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2018.1444700
23.
McCormickA. C. (2003). Swirling and double-dipping: New patterns of student attendance and their implications for higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 121, 13–24.
National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). DataLab tools: QuickStats, PowerStats, and TrendStats. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/training/datauser/COMO_06.html
PeterK.Forrest CataldiE. F. (2005). The road less traveled? Students who enroll in multiple institutions (NCES 2005-157). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education; U.S. Government Printing Office. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005157.pdf
30.
SáenzR. (2020). Latino continual demographic growth: Implications for educational practices and policy. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192719900383
31.
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. (2019). Digest of education statistics 2018 (NCES 2020-009). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020009.pdf
32.
SolerM. D. (2020). Conceptualizations and strategies to enhance student success in the transfer swirl. New Directions for Community Colleges, 192, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20422
33.
TaylorJ. L.JainD. (2017). The multiple dimensions of transfer: Examining the transfer function in American higher education. Community College Review, 45(4), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552117725177
WangX. (2012). Academic performance of community college transfers: Psychological, sociodemographic, and educational correlates. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(11), 872–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920903504976
37.
WangX.McCreadyB. (2013). The effect of postsecondary coenrollment on college success: Initial evidence and implications for policy and future research. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13505683
38.
WangX.WickershamK. (2014). Postsecondary co-enrollment and baccalaureate completion: A look at both beginning 4-year college students and baccalaureate aspirants beginning at community colleges. Research in Higher Education, 55, 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9317-4
39.
WickershamK. R. (2020). Where to go from here? Toward a model of 2-year college students’ postsecondary pathway selection. Community College Review, 48(2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119880941
