This project creates the first educational pipeline for the state of Texas. It incorporates middle school as a key transition point, differentiates between advanced degree achievement among Latinas/os and Chicanas/os, and fashions a secondary pipeline with a narrower age range. Findings indicate that the move from eighth grade to ninth is a critical juncture; that more adult Latinas/os and Chicanas/os lack any academic credentials among all ethnic groups; and that current generations experience similar inequitable achievement rates as older generations.
AcuñaR. (1988). Occupied America: A history of Chicanos (3rd ed.). Harper Collins.
2.
AlemánE.Jr. (2007). Situating Texas school finance policy in a CRT framework: How “substantially equal” yields racial inequity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 525–558.
3.
AlemánE.Jr. (2013). Intersecting educational finance, politics and the law with racism: A critical race case analysis. In TillmanL. C.ScheurichJ. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational leadership for equity and diversity (pp. 552–578). Routledge.
4.
BarberB. K.OlsenJ. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(1), 3–30.
Chao RomeroR. (2012). Law, social policy, and the Latina/o education pipeline (CSRC Research Report, No. 15). UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.
7.
CovarrubiasA. (2011). Quantitative intersectionality: A critical race analysis of the Chicana/o educational pipeline. Journal of Latinos in Education, 10(2), 86–105.
8.
CovarrubiasA.LaraA. (2014). The undocumented (im)migrant educational pipeline: The influence of citizenship status on educational attainment for people of Mexican origin. Urban Education, 49(1), 75–110.
9.
CovarrubiasA.LiouD. (2014). Asian American education and income attainment in the era of post-racial America. Teachers College Record, 116(6), 1–38.
10.
CovarrubiasA.NavaP.LaraA.BurciagaR.VélezV.SolórzanoD. (2018). Critical race quantitative intersections: A testimonio analysis. Race Ethnicity and Education21, 253–273.
11.
CovarrubiasA.VelézV. (2013). Critical race quantitative intersectionality: An anti-racist research paradigm that refuses to “let the numbers speak for themselves.” In LynnM.DixonA. (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 270–285). Routledge.
12.
De LeónA. (1974). Blowout 1910 style: A Chicano school boycott in West Texas. Texana, 12(2), 124–140.
13.
De OliverM. (1998). Geography, race, and class: A case study of the role of geography at an urban public university. American Journal of Education, 106(2), 273–301.
14.
DonatoR. (1997). The other struggle for equal schools: Mexican Americans during the Civil Rights era. State University of New York Press.
15.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC.WigfieldA.Miller BuchananC.ReumanD.FlanaganC.MacIverD. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.
16.
FoleyD. E. (1997). Deficit thinking models based on culture: The anthropological protest. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 113–131). The Falmer Press.
17.
GarcíaS.GuerraP. (2004). Deconstructing deficit thinking: Working with educators to create more equitable learning environments. Education and Urban Society, 36(2), 150–168.
18.
Holcomb-McCoyC. (2007). Transitioning to high school: Issues and challenges for African American students. Professional School Counseling, 10(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0701000306
19.
Horn CatherineL.Flores StellaM. (2003). Percent plans in college admissions: A comparative analysis of three states’ experiences. The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
20.
JangS. (2018). The implications of intersectionality on southeast Asian female students’ educational outcomes in the United States: A critical quantitative intersectionality analysis. American Educational Research Journal, Developmental Psychology55, 1268–1306. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218777225
21.
JohnsonB. H. (2003). Revolution in Texas: How a forgotten rebellion and its bloody suppression turned Mexicans into Americans. Yale University Press.
22.
LópezN.ErwinC.BinderM.ChavezM. J. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Advancing quantitative methods in higher education using critical race theory and intersectionality. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 180–207.
23.
MenchacaM. (1995). The Mexican outsiders: A community history of marginalization and discrimination in California. University of Texas Press.
PérezW.CortésR.RamosK.CoronadoH. (2010). “Cursed and blessed”: Examining the socioemotional and academic experiences of undocumented Latina and Latino college students. New Directions for Student Services, 2010(131), 35–51.
26.
Pérez HuberL.HuidorO.MalagónM.SánchezG.SolórzanoD. (2006). Falling through the Cracks: Critical transitions in the Latina/o educational pipeline: 2006 Education Summit Report (CSRC Research Report, No. 7). UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.
27.
Pérez HuberL.MalagónM.RamirezB.GonzalezL.JimenezA.VélezV. (2015). Still falling through the cracks: Revisiting the Latina/o education pipeline (CSRC Research Report, No. 19). UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.
28.
Pérez HuberL.VillanuevaB.GuarnerosN.VélezV.SolórzanoD. (2014). DACAmented in California: The impact of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program on Latinas/os (CSRC Research Report, No. 18). UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.
29.
PeskeH. G.HaycockK. (2006). Teaching inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality: A report and recommendations by the Education Trust. Education Trust.
30.
ReyesO.GillockK. L.KobusK.SanchezB. (2000). A longitudinal examination of the transition into senior high school for adolescents from urban, low-inocme status, and predominantly minority backgrounds. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(4), 4519–4544.
31.
RivasM.PérezJ.AlvarezC.SolórzanoD. (2007). An examination of Latina/o transfer students in California’s postsecondary institutions (Latino Policy & Issues Brief, No. 16). UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.
32.
SalinasC. (2001). El Colegio Altamirano (1897–1958): New histories of Chicano education in the southwest. Educational Forum, 65(1), 80–86.
33.
San MiguelG. (1983). The struggle against separate and unequal schools: Middle class Mexican Americans and the desegregation campaign in Texas, 1929-1957. History of Education Quarterly, 23(3), 343–359.
34.
San MiguelG.ValenciaR. R. (1998). From the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to Hopwood: The educational plight and struggle of Mexican Americans in the Southwest. Harvard Educational Review, 68(3), 353–412.
35.
SchakO.NicholsA. H. (2018). Degree attainment for Latino adults: National and state trends. Education Trust.
36.
SolórzanoD.VillalpandoO.OsegueraL. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(3), 272–294.
37.
SpringJ. (2016). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States (8th ed.). Routledge.
ValenciaR. R. (2008). Chicano students and the courts: The Mexican American legal struggle for educational equity. New York University Press.
40.
ValenciaR. R.BlackM. S. (2002). “Mexican Americans don’t value education!”—On the basis of the myth, mythmaking, and debunking. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1(2), 81–102.
41.
ValenzuelaA. (Ed.). (2016). Growing critically conscious teachers: A social justice curriculum for educators of Latino/a youth. Teachers College Press.
42.
VélezV.SolórzanoD. (2017) Critical race spatial analysis: Conceptualizing GIS as a tool for critical race research in education. In MorrisonD.AnnammaS.JacksonD. (Eds.), Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequity (pp. 8–31). Stylus.
43.
WilsonS. H. (2003). Brown over “other white”: Mexican Americans’ legal arguments and litigation strategy in school desegregation lawsuits. Law and History Review, 21(1), 145–194.
44.
YossoT.SolórzanoD. (2006). Leaks in the Chicana and Chicano educational pipeline (Latino Policy & Issues Brief, No. 7). UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.
