I argue that traditional models of student success should emphasize socialization that empowers students of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) while developing their self-concept, science identity, and self-efficacy. In-depth interviews with 58 STEM students and faculty across four universities in the Southwest who participate in a federally funded STEM education program reveal alternative cultural spaces that can be described as emancipatory and transformative that attract and engage students of color and help them thrive in STEM education.
AndradeL. M. (2018). Latina/o transfer students’ selective integration and spatial awareness of university spaces. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17, 347-374.
2.
AustinA. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94-122.
3.
BandaR. M.FlowersA. M. (2017). Birds of a feather do not always flock together: A critical analysis of Latina engineers and their involvement in student organizations. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 359-374.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
5.
BensimonE. M. (2005). Closing the achievement gap in higher education: An organizational learning perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 131, 99-111.
6.
BrickhouseN. W.PotterJ. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965-980.
7.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187-1218.
8.
ChemersM. M.ZurbriggenE. L.SyedM.GozaB. K.BearmanS. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 469-491.
9.
ColeD. (2010). The effects of student-faculty interactions on minority students’ college grades: Differences between aggregated and disaggregated data. Journal of the Professoriate, 3, 137-160.
10.
ContrerasF. (2005). The reconstruction of merit post proposition 209. Educational Policy, 19, 371-395.
11.
CrispG.ReyesN. A. S.DoranE. (2017). Predicting successful mathematics remediation among Latina/o students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 232-255.
12.
CuellerM. (2015). Latina/o student characteristics and outcomes at four-year Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs), emerging HSIs, and non-HSIs. In AlemanA.PusserB. P.BensimonE. (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 101-120). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
13.
DanielC. (2007). Outsiders-within: Critical race theory, graduate education and barriers to professionalization. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34, 25-42.
14.
DikaS. L.MartinJ. P. (2018). Bridge to persistence: Interactions with educators as social capital for Latina/o engineering majors. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17, 202-215.
15.
EaganM. K.StolzenbergE. B.ZimmermanH. B.AragonM. C.Whang SaysonH.Rios-AguilarC. (2017). The American freshman: National norms fall 2016. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.
16.
EspinosaL. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 209-241.
17.
EsteppC. M.VelascoJ. G.CulbertsonA. L.ConnerN. W. (2017). An investigation into mentoring practices of faculty who mentor undergraduate researchers at a Hispanic Serving Institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 338-358.
18.
FeaginJ. R.VeraH.ImaniN. (1996). The agony of education: Black students at white colleges and universities. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
FigueroaT. (2015). Underrepresented racial/ethnic minority graduate students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines: A cross institutional analysis of their experiences. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.
20.
FreireP. (1970a). The “banking” concept of education. In CanestrariA. S.MarlowB. A. (Eds.), Educational foundations: An anthology of critical readings (pp. 99-111). London, England: SAGE.
21.
FreireP. (1970b). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum Books.
22.
GirouxH. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 257-293.
23.
HanssonL. (2018). Science education, indoctrination, and the hidden curriculum. In MatthewsM. (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: New approaches (pp. 283-306). New York, NY: Springer.
24.
HazariZ.SadlerP. M.SonnertG. (2013). The science identity of college students: A gender and race/ethnicity comparison. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82-91.
25.
HochanadelA.FinamoreD. (2015). Fixed and growth mindset in education and how grit helps students persist in the face of adversity. Journal of International Education Research, 11, 47-50.
26.
HurtadoS. (2015). The transformative paradigm: Principles and challenges. In AlemanA.PusserB. P.BensimonE. (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 285-307). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
27.
HurtadoS.CabreraN. L.LinM. H.ArellanoL.EspinosaL. L. (2009). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50, 189-214.
28.
HurtadoS.EaganM. K.TranM. C.NewmanC. B.ChangM. J.VelascoP. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 553-579.
29.
HurtadoS.GonzalezR. A.Calderon GaldeanoE. (2015). Cross-institutional mentoring, transformative practice, and collaboration among Hispanic-serving institutions. In AlemanA.PusserB. P.BensimonE. (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 177-195). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
30.
KezarA. J. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
KezarA. J.LesterJ. (2011). Enhancing campus capacity for leadership: An examination of grassroots leaders in higher education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
KidderW. C. (2013). Misshaping the river: Proposition 209 and lessons for the Fisher case. Journal of College and University Law, 39, 53-126.
33.
KimY. K.SaxL. J. (2009). Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50, 437-459.
34.
LedesmaM. C. (2017). Leadership as mission critical: Latinas/os, the military, and affirmative action in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 123-143.
35.
MaloneK. R.BarabinoG. (2009). Narration of race in science, technology, engineering and math: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93, 485-510.
36.
MarinP. (2019). Is “business as usual” enough to be Hispanic-serving? Becoming a Hispanic-serving research institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 18, 165-181.
37.
MarkerP. (2000). Not only by our words: Connecting the pedagogy of Paulo Freire with the social study classroom. In HurshD. W.RossE. W. (Eds.), Democratic social education: Social studies for social change (pp. 135-148). New York, NY: Falmer Press.
38.
MertensD. M.BledoeK. L.SullivanM.WilsonA. (2010). Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 193-214). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
39.
MonarrezA.WaglerA.WaglerR. (2019). Latinx STEM teacher formation through a cultural wealth lens. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1538192719835685
40.
NevinA.SmithR. M.McNeilM. (2008). Shifting attitudes of related service provider: A disability study critical pedagogy approach. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 4(1), 1-12.
41.
NunezA. M. (2009). Modeling the effects of diversity experiences and multiple capitals on Latina/o college students’ academic self-confidence. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8, 179-196.
42.
PetersonR. E. (2003). Teaching how to read the world and change it: Critical pedagogy in the intermediate grades. In DarderA.BaltodanoM.TorresR. D. (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 305-323). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
PhinneyJ. S.CamposC. M. T.KallemeynD. M. P.KimC. (2011). Processes and outcomes of a mentoring program for Latino college freshmen. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 599-621.
44.
PietriE. S.HennesE. P.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.BaileyA. H.Moss-RacusinC. A.HandelsmanJ. (2019). Addressing unintended consequences of gender diversity interventions on women’s sense of belonging in STEM. Sex Roles, 80, 527-547.
45.
ReveloR. A.BaberL. D. (2018). Engineering resistors: Engineering Latina/o students and emerging resistant capital. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17, 249-269.
46.
RobbinsS. B.LauverK.LeH.DavisD.LangleyR.CarlstromA. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288.
47.
RobnettR. D.ChemersM. M.ZurbriggenE. L. (2015). Longitudinal associations among undergraduates’ research experiences, self-efficacy, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 847-867.
48.
RodriguezS.CunninghamK.JordanA. (2019). STEM identity development for Latinas: The role of self- and outside recognition. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 18, 254-272.
49.
TateK. A.FouadN. A.MarksL. R.YoungG.GuzmanE.WilliamsE. G. (2015). Underrepresented first-generation, low-income college students’ pursuit of a graduate education: Investigating the influence of self-efficacy, coping efficacy, and family influence. Journal of Career Assessment, 23, 427-441.
