This study looked at the experiences of six participants and their feelings of guilt. The findings revealed that guilt was caused when the participants put their needs before the needs of their family and attended college. Institutions of higher education may not know or understand the importance family plays for these students and may not foster parent participation, therefore potentially increasing these feelings of guilt.
BaumeisterR. F.StillwellA. M.HeathertonT. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
3.
BryanE.SimmonsL. A. (2009). Family involvement: Impacts on post-secondary educational success for first-generation Appalachian college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 391-406. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0081
CovarrubiasR.FrybergS. A. (2015). Movin’ on up (to college): First-generation college students’ experiences with family achievement guilt. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21, 420-429.
6.
CortazziM.JinL. (2006). Asking questions, sharing stories and identity construction: Sociocultural issues in narrative research. In TraharSheila (Ed.), Narrative research on learning: Comparative and international perspectives (pp. 27-46). Oxford: Symposium.
DelgadoR. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411-2441. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1577362
9.
EasleyN.BiancoM.LeechN. (2012). Ganas: A qualitative study examining Mexican heritage students’ motivation to succeed in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11, 164-178. doi:10.1177/1538192712440175
10.
IrlbeckE.AdamsS.AkersC.BurrisS.JonesS. (2014). First-generation college students: Motivations and support systems. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55, 154-166.
11.
LondonH. (1989). Breaking away: A study of first-generation college students and their families. American Journal of Education, 97, 144-170.
12.
MartinJ. (2013). Life positioning analysis: An analytic framework for the study of lives and life narratives. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 1-17.
13.
MasseyD. (2003). The puzzle of minority underachievement. In MasseyD. S.CharlesC. Z.LundyG. F.FischerM. J. (Eds.), The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America’s selective colleges and universities (pp. 1-19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
NiederlandW. (1961). The problem of the survivor, Part I: Some remarks on the psychiatric evaluation of emotional disorders in survivors of Nazi persecution. Journal of the Hillside Hospital, 10, 233-247.
15.
OrbeM. (2004). Negotiating multiple identities within multiple frames: An analysis of first-generation college students. Communication Education, 53, 131-149. doi:10.1080/03634520410001682401
16.
PascarellaE. T.PiersonC. T.WolniakG. C.TerenziniP. T. (2004). First-generation college students. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 249-284.
17.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
PiorkowskiG. K. (1983). Survivor guilt in the university setting. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 61, 620-622.
19.
Plano ClarkV.CreswellJ. (2010). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
20.
RendonL. (1992). From the barrio to the academy: Revelations of a Mexican American “scholarship girl.”New Directions for Community Colleges, 80, 55-64.
21.
RodriguezR. (1974). Going home again: The new American scholarship boy. The American Scholar, 44, 15-28.
