Using student-level data, this study explores the relationship between Latinx student representation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and student retention. Results revealed that a 1% increase in cohort-level Latinx student representation in STEM subfields is associated with a decrease in student departures from the university, but not STEM. Furthermore, Latinx STEM students may be more responsive to changes in the representation of their cohorts compared with increases in diversity for upper-division undergraduate or graduate students.
AntonioA. L. (2004). The influence of friendship groups on intellectual self-confidence and educational aspirations in college. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 446-471.
2.
BandaR. M.FlowersA. M. (2016). Birds of a feather do not always flock together: A critical analysis of Latina engineers and their involvement in student organizations. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 359-374.
3.
Bonous-HammarthM. (2000). Pathways to success: Affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. The Journal of Negro Education, 69, 92-111.
4.
CamachoM. M.LordS. M. (2013). The borderlands of education: Latinas in engineering. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
5.
CejaM. (2004). Chicana college aspirations and the role of parents: Developing educational resiliency. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3, 338-362.
6.
ChangM. J.SharknessJ.NewmanC.HurtadoS. (2010). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers. In American educational research association annual meeting. Denver, CO.
7.
ColeD.EspinozaA. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 285-300.
8.
CrispG.NoraA.TaggartA. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a stem degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 924-942.
9.
GarciaG. A. (2013). Does percentage of Latina/ox affect graduation rates at 4-year Hispanic serving institutions (HSIs), emerging HSIs, and non-HSIs?Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12, 256-268.
10.
GriffithA. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?Economics of Education Review, 29, 911-922.
11.
HagedornL. S.ChiW. Y.CepedaR. M.McLainM. (2007). An investigation of critical mass: The role of Latino representation in the success of urban community college students. Research in Higher Education, 48, 73-91.
12.
HurtadoS.EaganM. K.TranM. C.NewmanC. B.ChangM. J.VelascoP. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 553-579.
13.
HurtadoS.MilemJ. F.Clayton-PedersenA. R.AllenW. R. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 279-302.
14.
KannankuttyN.WilkinsonR. K. (1999). SESTAT: A tool for studying scientists and engineers in the United States (NSF 99-337). Arlington, VA. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies.
15.
LaneT. B. (2016). Beyond academic and social integration: Understanding the impact of a STEM enrichment program on the retention and degree attainment of underrepresented students. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(3), Article ar39.
16.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
MalteseA. V.TaiR. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907.
18.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digest of education statistics: Table 104.20. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
19.
National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB-14-01).
20.
National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
21.
NoraA.CabreraA. F. (1996). The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment to college. The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 119-148.
22.
PalmerP.MarambaP.DancyP. (2011). A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. Journal of Negro Education, 80, 491-504.
23.
PeraltaC.CasparyM.BootheD. (2013). Success factors impacting Latina/o persistence in higher education leading to STEM opportunities. Cultural Studies of Science Education Journal, 8, 905-918.
24.
PowersD.XieY. (2000). Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
RankinS. R.ReasonR. D. (2005). Differing perceptions: How students of color and White students perceive campus climate for underrepresented groups. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 43-61.
26.
ReveloR. A. (2015). Engineering familia: The role of a professional organization in the development of engineering identities of Latina/o undergraduates (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest
27.
RincónB.De La RosaB.ChapaJ. (2017). A state of neglect: Latino educational attainment. In De Los SantosA.RendónL. I.KellerG.AceredaA.BensimónE. M.TannenbaumsR. J. (Eds.), New directions: Assessment and preparation of Hispanic college students (pp. 59-74). Tempe, AZ: Bilingual Press.
28.
RincónB.LaneT. B. (2017). Latin@s in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) at the intersections. Journal of Equity & Excellence in Education, 50, 182-195.
29.
SeymourE.HewittN. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
TateE. D.LinnM. C. (2005). How does identity shape the experiences of women of Color engineering students?Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 483-493.
